From: Kees Cook <keescook@chromium.org>
To: Josh Poimboeuf <jpoimboe@kernel.org>
Cc: Randy Dunlap <rdunlap@infradead.org>,
Stephen Rothwell <sfr@canb.auug.org.au>,
Linux Next Mailing List <linux-next@vger.kernel.org>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
Kent Overstreet <kent.overstreet@linux.dev>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
Subject: Re: linux-next: Tree for Sep 12 (bcachefs, objtool)
Date: Thu, 14 Sep 2023 09:51:36 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <202309140951.F73B5557D6@keescook> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20230914135144.udwf3lmhh5zael5e@treble>
On Thu, Sep 14, 2023 at 03:51:44PM +0200, Josh Poimboeuf wrote:
> On Wed, Sep 13, 2023 at 06:01:42PM -0700, Kees Cook wrote:
> > > +++ b/fs/bcachefs/buckets.h
> > > @@ -180,7 +180,7 @@ static inline u64 bch2_dev_buckets_reserved(struct bch_dev *ca, enum bch_waterma
> > >
> > > switch (watermark) {
> > > case BCH_WATERMARK_NR:
> > > - unreachable();
> > > + BUG();
> >
> > Linus gets really upset about new BUG() usage (takes out the entire
> > system):
> > https://docs.kernel.org/process/deprecated.html#bug-and-bug-on
> >
> > It'd be nicer to actually handle the impossible case. (WARN and return
> > 0?)
>
> Sure, see below.
Looks good to me; thanks!
-Kees
>
> BTW, I'm about to go off grid for 1.5 weeks, so there will be no v3
> coming from me anytime soon :-)
>
> ---8<---
>
> From: Josh Poimboeuf <jpoimboe@kernel.org>
> Subject: [PATCH v2] bcachefs: Remove undefined behavior in bch2_dev_buckets_reserved()
>
> In general it's a good idea to avoid using bare unreachable() because it
> introduces undefined behavior in compiled code. In this case it even
> confuses GCC into emitting an empty unused
> bch2_dev_buckets_reserved.part.0() function.
>
> Use WARN_ON(1) instead, which is nice and defined. While in theory it
> should never trigger, if something were to go awry and the
> BCH_WATERMARK_NR case were to actually hit, the failure mode is more
> robust.
>
> Fixes the following warnings:
>
> vmlinux.o: warning: objtool: bch2_bucket_alloc_trans() falls through to next function bch2_reset_alloc_cursors()
> vmlinux.o: warning: objtool: bch2_dev_buckets_reserved.part.0() is missing an ELF size annotation
>
> Reported-by: Randy Dunlap <rdunlap@infradead.org>
> Signed-off-by: Josh Poimboeuf <jpoimboe@kernel.org>
> ---
> fs/bcachefs/buckets.h | 3 ++-
> 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/fs/bcachefs/buckets.h b/fs/bcachefs/buckets.h
> index f192809f50cf..211f054bf83d 100644
> --- a/fs/bcachefs/buckets.h
> +++ b/fs/bcachefs/buckets.h
> @@ -180,7 +180,8 @@ static inline u64 bch2_dev_buckets_reserved(struct bch_dev *ca, enum bch_waterma
>
> switch (watermark) {
> case BCH_WATERMARK_NR:
> - unreachable();
> + WARN_ON(1);
> + break;
> case BCH_WATERMARK_stripe:
> reserved += ca->mi.nbuckets >> 6;
> fallthrough;
> --
> 2.41.0
>
--
Kees Cook
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2023-09-14 16:51 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 19+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2023-09-12 5:26 linux-next: Tree for Sep 12 Stephen Rothwell
2023-09-12 22:28 ` linux-next: Tree for Sep 12 (drivers/clk/imx/clk-imx8-acm.o) Randy Dunlap
2023-09-21 9:39 ` Abel Vesa
2023-09-12 22:50 ` linux-next: Tree for Sep 12 [drivers/pinctrl/nuvoton/pinctrl-npcm8xx.ko] Randy Dunlap
2023-09-12 23:36 ` linux-next: Tree for Sep 12 (bcachefs, objtool) Randy Dunlap
2023-09-13 21:08 ` Josh Poimboeuf
2023-09-13 21:39 ` Randy Dunlap
2023-09-13 23:06 ` Kent Overstreet
2023-09-14 13:41 ` Josh Poimboeuf
2023-09-14 1:01 ` Kees Cook
2023-09-14 13:51 ` Josh Poimboeuf
2023-09-14 16:51 ` Kees Cook [this message]
2023-09-14 19:15 ` Kent Overstreet
2023-09-14 1:17 ` linux-next: Tree for Sep 12 (bcachefs) Kees Cook
2023-09-14 19:38 ` Kent Overstreet
2023-09-14 20:13 ` Gustavo A. R. Silva
2023-09-15 0:20 ` Kees Cook
2023-09-19 21:23 ` Kent Overstreet
2023-09-20 15:21 ` Kees Cook
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=202309140951.F73B5557D6@keescook \
--to=keescook@chromium.org \
--cc=jpoimboe@kernel.org \
--cc=kent.overstreet@linux.dev \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-next@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=peterz@infradead.org \
--cc=rdunlap@infradead.org \
--cc=sfr@canb.auug.org.au \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).