From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E4822CE79A8 for ; Wed, 20 Sep 2023 03:16:52 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S231630AbjITDQ4 (ORCPT ); Tue, 19 Sep 2023 23:16:56 -0400 Received: from lindbergh.monkeyblade.net ([23.128.96.19]:56836 "EHLO lindbergh.monkeyblade.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S229521AbjITDQz (ORCPT ); Tue, 19 Sep 2023 23:16:55 -0400 Received: from gandalf.ozlabs.org (mail.ozlabs.org [IPv6:2404:9400:2221:ea00::3]) by lindbergh.monkeyblade.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id F1453B0; Tue, 19 Sep 2023 20:16:48 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=canb.auug.org.au; s=201702; t=1695179803; bh=FcvIPU8fNd+lk476FhRdjCbsI18VwXUWxLBtQhlI8Do=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:In-Reply-To:References:From; b=uTj7Qs2doGAyGTFb4DBqiicoqosO9njoSZlOXOSf6KbBAqzquHKySyjjUmvDUNf9e Q8IGYZKgdGpZnq1dOVKsKgchAdNjbxCygG82QSGzaNILXxcmVfzGUKoTVIyPyJPIK5 GPlCJGA7y3ZMWIITx9r0ruy4ibIW0qUg7T4MrZvWwEGXmmhdvGgI9sfzepVH2cOpmT 7hEpMNVIaISZQIUdW5EYIoX5ugUJJq8ev5c9aiE66HhcsBSY1mlMoCKWYTAYeHQ6+0 qWsPRwAgl2S0WDbZYBRSZYmDozykFGkw0OxkO7nOcFPq2kuxfzS1SVMkWk72uK2tpf g0ujCUjUbxcfA== Received: from authenticated.ozlabs.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange ECDHE (prime256v1) server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by mail.ozlabs.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 4Rr3bb3zZjz4xSb; Wed, 20 Sep 2023 13:16:43 +1000 (AEST) Date: Wed, 20 Sep 2023 13:16:42 +1000 From: Stephen Rothwell To: David Sterba Cc: Linux Kernel Mailing List , Linux Next Mailing List Subject: Re: linux-next: build warnings after merge of the btrfs tree Message-ID: <20230920131642.62803bd8@canb.auug.org.au> In-Reply-To: <20230912222006.5a7cab3d@canb.auug.org.au> References: <20230912104646.3a9140f7@canb.auug.org.au> <20230912112011.GB20408@suse.cz> <20230912222006.5a7cab3d@canb.auug.org.au> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="Sig_/FAG_enEudv=Du=Dqq6jepBd"; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; micalg=pgp-sha256 Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-next@vger.kernel.org --Sig_/FAG_enEudv=Du=Dqq6jepBd Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Hi Stephen, On Tue, 12 Sep 2023 22:20:06 +1000 Stephen Rothwell = wrote: > > Hi David, >=20 > On Tue, 12 Sep 2023 13:20:11 +0200 David Sterba wrote: > >=20 > > I tried 12 and 13, no warnings on x86_64, however the report is on > > powerpc. If this is on a big endian host it could be a valid warning, we > > have an optmization where the on-disk format endianity matches CPU > > (little endian) then the structures btrfs_disk_key and btrfs_key are > > equivalent and no coversion is needed. > >=20 > > There were some changes that might be related and newly added to > > for-next so we don't have any other reference point, I'll take a look. = =20 >=20 > This is indeed a big endian build (big endian cross build on a little > endian host). I also did *not* get these warnings on my x86_64 build. But I do get them from my s390 defconfig build. Any progress? --=20 Cheers, Stephen Rothwell --Sig_/FAG_enEudv=Du=Dqq6jepBd Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Description: OpenPGP digital signature -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- iQEzBAEBCAAdFiEENIC96giZ81tWdLgKAVBC80lX0GwFAmUKZBoACgkQAVBC80lX 0Gy70gf/YmluHlhMP7eWESvTvE/NAroQsV7JJwxxnANNjjFzVbgss+VXC73QpW4e ZdxoxMPNvpb+I6dejb7+rmpjYYaW7VLgH2oT+Zqdq8GM6wRP3ULiBMQVoKK85DPC mzh9eb0mrbvdCr125ix4ShAdofmIdQMTIALnfASi4ffCxq/lStlBZGEXeasbUdcS pzQxGGWjDtmgvVkGlee8h6hI4LZw9M8ebiiW9mFlc1+efNHDODSU8V6IP441dQs2 mNNr+JsXiYO8i2AmSKOZ0BVSmPUVS7mwYe0dvYQJDLsJdQ0wZtgE9wpJYvjsr/n5 Xf9Ua6vidk8lxb0X1x9NpWKxisxMag== =lDmk -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --Sig_/FAG_enEudv=Du=Dqq6jepBd--