linux-next.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Leon Romanovsky <leon@kernel.org>
To: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@canb.auug.org.au>
Cc: Doug Ledford <dledford@redhat.com>,
	Jason Gunthorpe <jgg@mellanox.com>,
	Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	Linux Next Mailing List <linux-next@vger.kernel.org>,
	Michael Guralnik <michaelgur@nvidia.com>,
	Shay Drory <shayd@nvidia.com>
Subject: Re: linux-next: manual merge of the rdma tree with the rdma-fixes tree
Date: Thu, 28 Sep 2023 12:59:16 +0300	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20230928095916.GS1642130@unreal> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20230928113851.5197a1ec@canb.auug.org.au>

On Thu, Sep 28, 2023 at 11:38:51AM +1000, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
> Hi all,
> 
> Today's linux-next merge of the rdma tree got a conflict in:
> 
>   drivers/infiniband/hw/mlx5/mr.c
> 
> between commit:
> 
>   374012b00457 ("RDMA/mlx5: Fix mkey cache possible deadlock on cleanup")
> 
> from the rdma-fixes tree and commit:
> 
>   57e7071683ef ("RDMA/mlx5: Implement mkeys management via LIFO queue")
> 
> from the rdma tree.
> 
> I fixed it up (see below) and can carry the fix as necessary. This
> is now fixed as far as linux-next is concerned, but any non trivial
> conflicts should be mentioned to your upstream maintainer when your tree
> is submitted for merging.  You may also want to consider cooperating
> with the maintainer of the conflicting tree to minimise any particularly
> complex conflicts.
> 
> -- 
> Cheers,
> Stephen Rothwell
> 
> diff --cc drivers/infiniband/hw/mlx5/mr.c
> index 433f96459246,b0fa2d644973..000000000000
> --- a/drivers/infiniband/hw/mlx5/mr.c
> +++ b/drivers/infiniband/hw/mlx5/mr.c
> @@@ -1025,21 -998,15 +999,21 @@@ void mlx5_mkey_cache_cleanup(struct mlx
>   	if (!dev->cache.wq)
>   		return;
>   
>  -	cancel_delayed_work_sync(&dev->cache.remove_ent_dwork);
>   	mutex_lock(&dev->cache.rb_lock);
>  +	dev->cache.disable = true;
>   	for (node = rb_first(root); node; node = rb_next(node)) {
>   		ent = rb_entry(node, struct mlx5_cache_ent, node);
> - 		xa_lock_irq(&ent->mkeys);
> + 		spin_lock_irq(&ent->mkeys_queue.lock);
>   		ent->disabled = true;
> - 		xa_unlock_irq(&ent->mkeys);
> + 		spin_unlock_irq(&ent->mkeys_queue.lock);
>  -		cancel_delayed_work_sync(&ent->dwork);
>   	}
>  +	mutex_unlock(&dev->cache.rb_lock);
>  +
>  +	/*
>  +	 * After all entries are disabled and will not reschedule on WQ,
>  +	 * flush it and all async commands.
>  +	 */
>  +	flush_workqueue(dev->cache.wq);
>   
>   	mlx5_mkey_cache_debugfs_cleanup(dev);
>   	mlx5_cmd_cleanup_async_ctx(&dev->async_ctx);

Thanks for the fix.

  reply	other threads:[~2023-09-28  9:59 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 24+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2023-09-28  1:38 linux-next: manual merge of the rdma tree with the rdma-fixes tree Stephen Rothwell
2023-09-28  9:59 ` Leon Romanovsky [this message]
  -- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2025-03-06  1:37 Stephen Rothwell
2025-03-06 10:24 ` Zhu Yanjun
2025-03-06 11:35   ` Zhu Yanjun
     [not found] ` <4d66668a-ff8e-48f6-a5e3-98ada08c5037@linux.dev>
2025-03-06 20:33   ` Stephen Rothwell
2022-01-06  0:44 Stephen Rothwell
2021-09-30  1:35 Stephen Rothwell
2021-10-01 13:52 ` Jason Gunthorpe
2019-08-23  2:22 Stephen Rothwell
2019-08-23 15:02 ` Jason Gunthorpe
2018-07-10  1:17 Stephen Rothwell
2018-07-10  5:19 ` Leon Romanovsky
2018-06-27  0:07 Stephen Rothwell
2018-06-27  5:50 ` Leon Romanovsky
2018-05-01  0:10 Stephen Rothwell
2018-05-01  0:55 ` Doug Ledford
2018-05-02 10:22   ` Leon Romanovsky
2018-05-02 14:00     ` Doug Ledford
2018-05-02 17:50       ` Jason Gunthorpe
2018-03-22  0:45 Stephen Rothwell
2018-01-17  1:51 Stephen Rothwell
2018-01-17  1:55 ` Stephen Rothwell
2018-01-17  3:03   ` Jason Gunthorpe

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20230928095916.GS1642130@unreal \
    --to=leon@kernel.org \
    --cc=dledford@redhat.com \
    --cc=jgg@mellanox.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-next@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=michaelgur@nvidia.com \
    --cc=sfr@canb.auug.org.au \
    --cc=shayd@nvidia.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).