From: Bjorn Helgaas <helgaas@kernel.org>
To: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@canb.auug.org.au>
Cc: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@rjwysocki.net>,
"Bjorn Helgaas" <bhelgaas@google.com>,
"Lorenzo Pieralisi" <lpieralisi@kernel.org>,
"Krzysztof Wilczyński" <kw@linux.com>,
"Alex Williamson" <alex.williamson@redhat.com>,
"Linux Kernel Mailing List" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
"Linux Next Mailing List" <linux-next@vger.kernel.org>,
"Rafael J. Wysocki" <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>,
"Sakari Ailus" <sakari.ailus@linux.intel.com>
Subject: Re: linux-next: manual merge of the pm tree with the pci-current tree
Date: Tue, 20 Feb 2024 09:36:16 -0600 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20240220153616.GA1481509@bhelgaas> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20240214103008.0bb12069@canb.auug.org.au>
On Wed, Feb 14, 2024 at 10:30:08AM +1100, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> Today's linux-next merge of the pm tree got a conflict in:
>
> drivers/pci/pci.c
>
> between commit:
>
> 41044d536068 ("PCI: Fix active state requirement in PME polling")
>
> from the pci-current tree and commit:
>
> c0ef3df8dbae ("PM: runtime: Simplify pm_runtime_get_if_active() usage")
>
> from the pm tree.
Just FYI, 41044d536068 is now upstream for v6.8, so the conflict will
be between upstream and the pm tree:
https://git.kernel.org/linus/41044d536068
> I fixed it up (see below) and can carry the fix as necessary. This
> is now fixed as far as linux-next is concerned, but any non trivial
> conflicts should be mentioned to your upstream maintainer when your tree
> is submitted for merging. You may also want to consider cooperating
> with the maintainer of the conflicting tree to minimise any particularly
> complex conflicts.
>
> --
> Cheers,
> Stephen Rothwell
>
> diff --cc drivers/pci/pci.c
> index a532bf597e57,cb51c4079013..000000000000
> --- a/drivers/pci/pci.c
> +++ b/drivers/pci/pci.c
> @@@ -2361,36 -2522,29 +2361,36 @@@ static void pci_pme_list_scan(struct wo
> if (pdev->pme_poll) {
> struct pci_dev *bridge = pdev->bus->self;
> struct device *dev = &pdev->dev;
> - int pm_status;
> + struct device *bdev = bridge ? &bridge->dev : NULL;
> + int bref = 0;
>
> /*
> - * If bridge is in low power state, the
> - * configuration space of subordinate devices
> - * may be not accessible
> + * If we have a bridge, it should be in an active/D0
> + * state or the configuration space of subordinate
> + * devices may not be accessible or stable over the
> + * course of the call.
> */
> - if (bridge && bridge->current_state != PCI_D0)
> - continue;
> + if (bdev) {
> - bref = pm_runtime_get_if_active(bdev, true);
> ++ bref = pm_runtime_get_if_active(bdev);
> + if (!bref)
> + continue;
> +
> + if (bridge->current_state != PCI_D0)
> + goto put_bridge;
> + }
>
> /*
> - * If the device is in a low power state it
> - * should not be polled either.
> + * The device itself should be suspended but config
> + * space must be accessible, therefore it cannot be in
> + * D3cold.
> */
> - pm_status = pm_runtime_get_if_active(dev);
> - if (!pm_status)
> - continue;
> -
> - if (pdev->current_state != PCI_D3cold)
> + if (pm_runtime_suspended(dev) &&
> + pdev->current_state != PCI_D3cold)
> pci_pme_wakeup(pdev, NULL);
>
> - if (pm_status > 0)
> - pm_runtime_put(dev);
> +put_bridge:
> + if (bref > 0)
> + pm_runtime_put(bdev);
> } else {
> list_del(&pme_dev->list);
> kfree(pme_dev);
prev parent reply other threads:[~2024-02-20 15:36 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2024-02-13 23:30 linux-next: manual merge of the pm tree with the pci-current tree Stephen Rothwell
2024-02-14 7:09 ` Sakari Ailus
2024-02-20 15:36 ` Bjorn Helgaas [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20240220153616.GA1481509@bhelgaas \
--to=helgaas@kernel.org \
--cc=alex.williamson@redhat.com \
--cc=bhelgaas@google.com \
--cc=kw@linux.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-next@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=lpieralisi@kernel.org \
--cc=rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com \
--cc=rjw@rjwysocki.net \
--cc=sakari.ailus@linux.intel.com \
--cc=sfr@canb.auug.org.au \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox