public inbox for linux-next@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@canb.auug.org.au>
To: Theodore Ts'o <tytso@mit.edu>
Cc: Christian Brauner <brauner@kernel.org>,
	Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>,
	Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	Linux Next Mailing List <linux-next@vger.kernel.org>,
	"Ritesh Harjani (IBM)" <ritesh.list@gmail.com>
Subject: Re: linux-next: manual merge of the vfs-brauner tree with the ext4 tree
Date: Tue, 14 May 2024 11:28:56 +1000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20240514112856.5fec87d3@canb.auug.org.au> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20240508103436.589bb440@canb.auug.org.au>

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1422 bytes --]

Hi all,

On Wed, 8 May 2024 10:34:36 +1000 Stephen Rothwell <sfr@canb.auug.org.au> wrote:
>
> Today's linux-next merge of the vfs-brauner tree got a conflict in:
> 
>   fs/ext4/file.c
> 
> between commit:
> 
>   a0c7cce824a5 ("ext4: set FMODE_CAN_ODIRECT instead of a dummy direct_IO method")
> 
> from the ext4 tree and commit:
> 
>   210a03c9d51a ("fs: claw back a few FMODE_* bits")
> 
> from the vfs-brauner tree.
> 
> I fixed it up (see below) and can carry the fix as necessary. This
> is now fixed as far as linux-next is concerned, but any non trivial
> conflicts should be mentioned to your upstream maintainer when your tree
> is submitted for merging.  You may also want to consider cooperating
> with the maintainer of the conflicting tree to minimise any particularly
> complex conflicts.
> 
> 
> diff --cc fs/ext4/file.c
> index 77529c655f95,28c51b0cc4db..000000000000
> --- a/fs/ext4/file.c
> +++ b/fs/ext4/file.c
> @@@ -884,8 -885,7 +884,7 @@@ static int ext4_file_open(struct inode 
>   			return ret;
>   	}
>   
> - 	filp->f_mode |= FMODE_NOWAIT | FMODE_BUF_RASYNC |
> - 			FMODE_DIO_PARALLEL_WRITE | FMODE_CAN_ODIRECT;
>  -	filp->f_mode |= FMODE_NOWAIT;
> ++	filp->f_mode |= FMODE_NOWAIT | FMODE_CAN_ODIRECT;
>   	return dquot_file_open(inode, filp);
>   }
>   

This is now a conflict between the ext4 tree and Linus' tree.

-- 
Cheers,
Stephen Rothwell

[-- Attachment #2: OpenPGP digital signature --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 488 bytes --]

  parent reply	other threads:[~2024-05-14  1:28 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 11+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2024-05-08  0:34 linux-next: manual merge of the vfs-brauner tree with the ext4 tree Stephen Rothwell
2024-05-08  6:47 ` Christoph Hellwig
2024-05-08  6:59   ` Stephen Rothwell
2024-05-08 22:04     ` Theodore Ts'o
2024-05-14  1:28 ` Stephen Rothwell [this message]
  -- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2026-03-27 17:38 Mark Brown
2026-03-30  8:30 ` Jan Kara
2024-09-03 23:15 Stephen Rothwell
2024-09-16 22:23 ` Stephen Rothwell
2023-08-21  0:07 Stephen Rothwell
2023-08-21  0:25 ` Stephen Rothwell

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20240514112856.5fec87d3@canb.auug.org.au \
    --to=sfr@canb.auug.org.au \
    --cc=brauner@kernel.org \
    --cc=hch@lst.de \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-next@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=ritesh.list@gmail.com \
    --cc=tytso@mit.edu \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox