From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from mail.ozlabs.org (gandalf.ozlabs.org [150.107.74.76]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 1CDD015575C; Tue, 9 Jul 2024 13:29:20 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=150.107.74.76 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1720531763; cv=none; b=JpGLa6ebki496wpkMDDJ3jC3xhRFPtTsKxwhOl89D+MHIKeoJyr2GI3U8iQRQXjAZdpPAZW67x9sDnyJubB09oFv+hY6TiYU3sDphLPI0s974eqedDQRZmO1tBb74qRqEess3gpE94vYTJZexeDxb9+e7YE+bnXo3xWVVuWu11w= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1720531763; c=relaxed/simple; bh=KUMM/Y6Cr3JlVVQc0TPJ5+fE2qtpm+zVw5CjYuV9kfw=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:Message-ID:In-Reply-To:References: MIME-Version:Content-Type; b=sjYsej1/LBRBMY9IfSqxX+kzCu/VxQskjbtfLxPjYLvTtNiY7R9FytJPMkjqZcCJwqxgNcAIYoy41Ny1QTYRhk7GcrVabLWX2az8vItYamzYcEWJWC4ihPlLq/u3dhQ0I7qTpnSDjLgfdLg6IJZLH+URELBwYwCrARpM47QcoHQ= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=canb.auug.org.au; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=canb.auug.org.au; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=canb.auug.org.au header.i=@canb.auug.org.au header.b=eNDisifI; arc=none smtp.client-ip=150.107.74.76 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=canb.auug.org.au Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=canb.auug.org.au Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=canb.auug.org.au header.i=@canb.auug.org.au header.b="eNDisifI" DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=canb.auug.org.au; s=201702; t=1720531759; bh=VmVJZsHAQJgYIEEqsBkQ/q4o+ZHXxEHrOveklUFiGuY=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:In-Reply-To:References:From; b=eNDisifI9FqwYzkTZgGPITOPnmeqSRHyWlKj+w7LNoHmDYS195OYsFYi8v94KlMZI csXZLRnd+92vr5Mqqeyxuj2NIFgP2AAYTmJmS//HH2oTEoI4S73AV1icBX7CYO1QbC gBxHWocLzTgSqgtPw35ymw/yWHcjVBbSQZ1g5NKSYjElUTHPKMowcPm2AErB9gLzpH GWaJsljYj9Oil1+kecgtqzC/6mVt82XYqKeHt3hynS9oru3WNxKaXPgoU9Au7r9jDK laxy5vD/KpznivknU6ZU//Iazrd+jWa+Lm3mYcMBoNY/kdIeprLVNEmOUkTXADmWTh UI/V9DFqeRpHg== Received: from authenticated.ozlabs.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange ECDHE (prime256v1) server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by mail.ozlabs.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 4WJMK94jrqz4w2P; Tue, 9 Jul 2024 23:29:17 +1000 (AEST) Date: Tue, 9 Jul 2024 23:29:16 +1000 From: Stephen Rothwell To: "Arnd Bergmann" , "Rob Herring" Cc: "Olof Johansson" , "Palmer Dabbelt" , "Paul Walmsley" , ARM , "Linux Kernel Mailing List" , linux-next Subject: Re: linux-next: duplicate patches in the devicetree tree Message-ID: <20240709232916.270d9927@canb.auug.org.au> In-Reply-To: References: <20240709164618.69cfcfad@canb.auug.org.au> Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: linux-next@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="Sig_/uG0ovzMaMlpMnt5a/gDqhBe"; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; micalg=pgp-sha256 --Sig_/uG0ovzMaMlpMnt5a/gDqhBe Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Hi all, On Tue, 09 Jul 2024 15:15:44 +0200 "Arnd Bergmann" wrote: > > On Tue, Jul 9, 2024, at 14:42, Rob Herring wrote: > > On Tue, Jul 9, 2024 at 12:46=E2=80=AFAM Stephen Rothwell wrote: =20 > >> > >> The following commits are also in the arm-soc and risc-v trees as > >> different commits (but the same patches): > >> > >> 0620bce64afa ("dt-bindings: riscv: cpus: add ref to interrupt-contro= ller") > >> 877097a2fab0 ("dt-bindings: interrupt-controller: convert marvell,mp= ic binding to YAML") > >> c7ce06684bf5 ("dt-bindings: interrupt-controller: riscv,cpu-intc: co= nvert to dtschema") =20 > > > > I had to rebase my tree yesterday to drop a bunch of reserved-memory > > restructuring that seems broken beyond repair. Maybe I'm going to have > > to just do reverts instead. I had no knowledge that anyone had pulled > > in my tree and how is it just these 3 commits? It should be at least > > these: =20 >=20 > I picked up=20 >=20 > b1a4e71d4fc4 arm: dts: arm: Drop redundant fixed-factor clocks > f7e642bcd622 dt-bindings: interrupt-controller: convert marvell,mpic bind= ing to YAML > 2af8d8a583a4 ARM: dts: armada-{370-xp,375,38x,39x}: Drop #size-cells from= mpic node >=20 > from patchwork when they were sent to soc@kernel.org. I don't > see the other ones in the arm-soc tree though, maybe they > are merged elsewhere? Yeah, the risc-v tree. Sorry about that, I should probably have done 2 notifications. --=20 Cheers, Stephen Rothwell --Sig_/uG0ovzMaMlpMnt5a/gDqhBe Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Description: OpenPGP digital signature -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- iQEzBAEBCAAdFiEENIC96giZ81tWdLgKAVBC80lX0GwFAmaNOywACgkQAVBC80lX 0GwtLAgAgn2AN5hx5okQjavimXlOhMzyiu44dEo8DnkA2PWHc88QQTlSUG1NHQcy Fu0ZgllRPhGWyzz5PzMvWzHiyAEkd25h+I/GqgW+XIpl7WJtLJW3V5ow3BHDbs5k gC5roYnx0yY1aw6MEyEVTn6svq9OzDyRJQljvfht6Q42N53mx2Qx3VTDMbe5B6Xi 4WHlpB2Ko7R3I3ANA4Uc1KBQhv8N0ey3L2SHg8TmnXv4jtcZRH28f5zm8VDEqRJI wGsDXdb9ajrZKNZ6dN+N0AZG3gjsTdj0Vh3NSeJFMvfucWNuEVMoUV8VXBNeASDf XYrBU2e8pfTK/a1P/iW+w3A+c7s8LQ== =3vEU -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --Sig_/uG0ovzMaMlpMnt5a/gDqhBe--