From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from smtp.kernel.org (aws-us-west-2-korg-mail-1.web.codeaurora.org [10.30.226.201]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 0B6B129AB; Wed, 10 Jul 2024 07:16:54 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=10.30.226.201 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1720595815; cv=none; b=FLO905kJPTdmCN1jUlDPfZCWKRFeXm1r0hX1UUeVrSou3UoVtkBKOWMXwSpyI5XcsHicJqWYY/6R0p0SPE0cFr7oUpkLHL+QVUJbonMQY3ad9UWIwoX+7TqOuvLvj2HCvxUwUiD587z9LmNncp2YKiGcWS8puFlgvwuAv8ixde0= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1720595815; c=relaxed/simple; bh=PMn0NvNcLtSKKcj82FevK7aYqnhksdqSZwI7b+jpi+U=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:Message-ID:References:MIME-Version: Content-Type:Content-Disposition:In-Reply-To; b=nFNyWoO/5xTfTiRxEBYtdhFM01Ep9kg2PzHURD3+FH7o99uC1x999z+EC9QNezS19RFEQiJ5xV8XlguyALMlvYQObxKri3NklP7AasuFQqyDkYp0qBOtW0GA/Z5EuOrNUUUdTqDLmiX49nwEa8KeNp0gpQb01DVSOVr9AXAFuws= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=kernel.org header.i=@kernel.org header.b=cX09BQnx; arc=none smtp.client-ip=10.30.226.201 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=kernel.org header.i=@kernel.org header.b="cX09BQnx" Received: by smtp.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 99319C32781; Wed, 10 Jul 2024 07:16:53 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=kernel.org; s=k20201202; t=1720595814; bh=PMn0NvNcLtSKKcj82FevK7aYqnhksdqSZwI7b+jpi+U=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:References:In-Reply-To:From; b=cX09BQnxvaLRsPyH+nL6XNWd+Eg8QuhSPpCrqTDsQI58gEqGs/tS71vmFzS+XJcvF awsF08SkOQjATC3NeMofz9HgpxrlA/xcNE/GGn5UMxesJ/NbNSS47kbZtooG/RheFA ajjFAwqEQ0Hye10htQdtskXfuVgKXzZ6c7uhuxc73vjavx/1LbKcuDz6u/Szu11t34 SluEC8G2OnIgqp91+7yj0yxPAIOwX64sbdIDsigUquIMiKp71ZfYjNN9Fru52qo1KL AAJgDlt7eh4WVWKKCitU8Q3/qpE/cflW5ONGgsi2tv2ZeTODFIsXrU60m0xDxz91np vWyQSMF8ES35g== Date: Wed, 10 Jul 2024 08:16:50 +0100 From: Lee Jones To: Stephen Rothwell Cc: Christian Marangi , Linux Kernel Mailing List , Linux Next Mailing List Subject: Re: linux-next: build failure after merge of the leds-lj tree Message-ID: <20240710071650.GG501857@google.com> References: <20240710163407.6393021f@canb.auug.org.au> Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: linux-next@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit In-Reply-To: <20240710163407.6393021f@canb.auug.org.au> On Wed, 10 Jul 2024, Stephen Rothwell wrote: > Hi all, > > After merging the leds-lj tree, today's linux-next build (x86_64 > allmodconfig) failed like this: > > drivers/leds/leds-lp5521.c: In function 'lp5521_selftest': > drivers/leds/leds-lp5521.c:189:33: error: macro "guard" passed 2 arguments, but takes just 1 > 189 | guard(mutex, &chip->lock); On it. Thanks for the heads-up. https://lore.kernel.org/all/20240710071050.GF501857@google.com/ -- Lee Jones [李琼斯]