Linux-Next discussions
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@canb.auug.org.au>
To: Greg KH <greg@kroah.com>, Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Cc: "Christophe JAILLET" <christophe.jaillet@wanadoo.fr>,
	"Linux Kernel Mailing List" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	"Linux Next Mailing List" <linux-next@vger.kernel.org>,
	"Uwe Kleine-König" <u.kleine-koenig@pengutronix.de>
Subject: Re: linux-next: manual merge of the driver-core tree with the mm tree
Date: Wed, 24 Jul 2024 08:57:21 +1000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20240724085721.7fac67d8@canb.auug.org.au> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20240612123640.68ae0310@canb.auug.org.au>

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1475 bytes --]

Hi all,

On Wed, 12 Jun 2024 12:36:40 +1000 Stephen Rothwell <sfr@canb.auug.org.au> wrote:
> 
> Today's linux-next merge of the driver-core tree got a conflict in:
> 
>   drivers/fsi/fsi-occ.c
> 
> between commit:
> 
>   2d2bf1e680a9 ("fsi: occ: remove usage of the deprecated ida_simple_xx() API")
> 
> from the mm-nonmm-unstable branch of the mm tree and commit:
> 
>   29f102dbb11f ("fsi: occ: Convert to platform remove callback returning void")
> 
> from the driver-core tree.
> 
> I fixed it up (see below) and can carry the fix as necessary. This
> is now fixed as far as linux-next is concerned, but any non trivial
> conflicts should be mentioned to your upstream maintainer when your tree
> is submitted for merging.  You may also want to consider cooperating
> with the maintainer of the conflicting tree to minimise any particularly
> complex conflicts.
> 
> diff --cc drivers/fsi/fsi-occ.c
> index f7157c1d77d8,21d2666c4195..000000000000
> --- a/drivers/fsi/fsi-occ.c
> +++ b/drivers/fsi/fsi-occ.c
> @@@ -718,9 -719,7 +718,7 @@@ static void occ_remove(struct platform_
>   	else
>   		device_for_each_child(&pdev->dev, NULL, occ_unregister_of_child);
>   
>  -	ida_simple_remove(&occ_ida, occ->idx);
>  +	ida_free(&occ_ida, occ->idx);
> - 
> - 	return 0;
>   }
>   
>   static const struct of_device_id occ_match[] = {

This conflict is now between the driver-core tree and Linus tree.

-- 
Cheers,
Stephen Rothwell

[-- Attachment #2: OpenPGP digital signature --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 488 bytes --]

  parent reply	other threads:[~2024-07-23 22:57 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2024-06-12  2:36 linux-next: manual merge of the driver-core tree with the mm tree Stephen Rothwell
2024-06-12  6:07 ` Uwe Kleine-König
2024-07-23 22:57 ` Stephen Rothwell [this message]
2024-07-24  6:33   ` Greg KH

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20240724085721.7fac67d8@canb.auug.org.au \
    --to=sfr@canb.auug.org.au \
    --cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=christophe.jaillet@wanadoo.fr \
    --cc=greg@kroah.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-next@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=u.kleine-koenig@pengutronix.de \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox