From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@canb.auug.org.au>
To: Kishon Vijay Abraham I <kishon@kernel.org>,
Vinod Koul <vkoul@kernel.org>
Cc: "Krzysztof Kozlowski" <krzk@kernel.org>,
"André Draszik" <andre.draszik@linaro.org>,
"Krzysztof Kozlowski" <krzysztof.kozlowski@linaro.org>,
"Linux Kernel Mailing List" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
"Linux Next Mailing List" <linux-next@vger.kernel.org>,
"Peter Griffin" <peter.griffin@linaro.org>
Subject: Re: linux-next: manual merge of the phy-next tree with the samsung-krzk tree
Date: Wed, 24 Jul 2024 09:14:58 +1000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20240724091458.3052dc6f@canb.auug.org.au> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20240703141932.47e51748@canb.auug.org.au>
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1676 bytes --]
Hi all,
On Wed, 3 Jul 2024 14:19:32 +1000 Stephen Rothwell <sfr@canb.auug.org.au> wrote:
>
> Today's linux-next merge of the phy-next tree got a conflict in:
>
> include/linux/soc/samsung/exynos-regs-pmu.h
>
> between commit:
>
> 85863cee8ce0 ("soc: samsung: exynos-pmu: add support for PMU_ALIVE non atomic registers")
>
> from the samsung-krzk tree and commit:
>
> 32267c29bc7d ("phy: exynos5-usbdrd: support Exynos USBDRD 3.1 combo phy (HS & SS)")
>
> from the phy-next tree.
>
> I fixed it up (see below) and can carry the fix as necessary. This
> is now fixed as far as linux-next is concerned, but any non trivial
> conflicts should be mentioned to your upstream maintainer when your tree
> is submitted for merging. You may also want to consider cooperating
> with the maintainer of the conflicting tree to minimise any particularly
> complex conflicts.
>
> diff --cc include/linux/soc/samsung/exynos-regs-pmu.h
> index f411c176536d,6765160eaab2..000000000000
> --- a/include/linux/soc/samsung/exynos-regs-pmu.h
> +++ b/include/linux/soc/samsung/exynos-regs-pmu.h
> @@@ -657,8 -657,8 +657,12 @@@
> #define EXYNOS5433_PAD_RETENTION_UFS_OPTION (0x3268)
> #define EXYNOS5433_PAD_RETENTION_FSYSGENIO_OPTION (0x32A8)
>
> +/* For Tensor GS101 */
> +#define GS101_SYSIP_DAT0 (0x810)
> +#define GS101_SYSTEM_CONFIGURATION (0x3A00)
> +
> + /* For GS101 */
> + #define GS101_PHY_CTRL_USB20 0x3eb0
> + #define GS101_PHY_CTRL_USBDP 0x3eb4
> +
> #endif /* __LINUX_SOC_EXYNOS_REGS_PMU_H */
This is now a conflict between he phy-next tree and Linus' tree.
--
Cheers,
Stephen Rothwell
[-- Attachment #2: OpenPGP digital signature --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 488 bytes --]
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2024-07-23 23:15 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2024-07-03 4:19 linux-next: manual merge of the phy-next tree with the samsung-krzk tree Stephen Rothwell
2024-07-23 23:14 ` Stephen Rothwell [this message]
2024-07-24 8:57 ` André Draszik
2024-07-24 9:00 ` Vinod Koul
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20240724091458.3052dc6f@canb.auug.org.au \
--to=sfr@canb.auug.org.au \
--cc=andre.draszik@linaro.org \
--cc=kishon@kernel.org \
--cc=krzk@kernel.org \
--cc=krzysztof.kozlowski@linaro.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-next@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=peter.griffin@linaro.org \
--cc=vkoul@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox