public inbox for linux-next@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@canb.auug.org.au>
To: Aleksa Sarai <cyphar@cyphar.com>, Christian Brauner <brauner@kernel.org>
Cc: Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	Linux Next Mailing List <linux-next@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: linux-next: build failure after merge of the vfs-brauner tree
Date: Tue, 10 Sep 2024 10:23:32 +1000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20240910102332.4f171bde@canb.auug.org.au> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20240905105809.6585eec2@canb.auug.org.au>

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 3378 bytes --]

Hi all,

On Thu, 5 Sep 2024 10:58:09 +1000 Stephen Rothwell <sfr@canb.auug.org.au> wrote:
>
> On Tue, 3 Sep 2024 12:41:08 +1000 Aleksa Sarai <cyphar@cyphar.com> wrote:
> >
> > On 2024-09-03, Stephen Rothwell <sfr@canb.auug.org.au> wrote:  
> > > Hi all,
> > > 
> > > After merging the vfs-brauner tree, today's linux-next build (native perf)
> > > failed like this:
> > > 
> > > In file included from trace/beauty/fs_at_flags.c:21:
> > > perf/trace/beauty/generated/fs_at_flags_array.c:10:31: error: initialized field overwritten [-Werror=override-init]
> > >    10 |         [ilog2(0x0001) + 1] = "RENAME_NOREPLACE",
> > >       |                               ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
> > > perf/trace/beauty/generated/fs_at_flags_array.c:10:31: note: (near initialization for 'fs_at_flags[1]')
> > > perf/trace/beauty/generated/fs_at_flags_array.c:14:30: error: initialized field overwritten [-Werror=override-init]
> > >    14 |         [ilog2(0x200) + 1] = "HANDLE_FID",
> > >       |                              ^~~~~~~~~~~~
> > > perf/trace/beauty/generated/fs_at_flags_array.c:14:30: note: (near initialization for 'fs_at_flags[10]')
> > > perf/trace/beauty/generated/fs_at_flags_array.c:15:30: error: initialized field overwritten [-Werror=override-init]
> > >    15 |         [ilog2(0x001) + 1] = "HANDLE_MNT_ID_UNIQUE",
> > >       |                              ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
> > > perf/trace/beauty/generated/fs_at_flags_array.c:15:30: note: (near initialization for 'fs_at_flags[1]')
> > > 
> > > Caused by commit
> > > 
> > >   34cf40849654 ("uapi: explain how per-syscall AT_* flags should be allocated")
> > > 
> > > I have used the vfs-brauner tree from next-20240902 for today.    
> > 
> > Ah okay, the overlapping flag definitions in the copied over fcntl.h are
> > causing issues. We could just drop that part of the patch, or (since the
> > new flags aren't handled by perf/trace/beauty) we could just do
> > something simple like:
> > 
> > diff --git a/tools/perf/trace/beauty/fs_at_flags.sh b/tools/perf/trace/beauty/fs_at_flags.sh
> > index 456f59addf74..930384029599 100755
> > --- a/tools/perf/trace/beauty/fs_at_flags.sh
> > +++ b/tools/perf/trace/beauty/fs_at_flags.sh
> > @@ -13,9 +13,13 @@ printf "static const char *fs_at_flags[] = {\n"
> >  regex='^[[:space:]]*#[[:space:]]*define[[:space:]]+AT_([^_]+[[:alnum:]_]+)[[:space:]]+(0x[[:xdigit:]]+)[[:space:]]*.*'
> >  # AT_EACCESS is only meaningful to faccessat, so we will special case it there...
> >  # AT_STATX_SYNC_TYPE is not a bit, its a mask of AT_STATX_SYNC_AS_STAT, AT_STATX_FORCE_SYNC and AT_STATX_DONT_SYNC
> > +# AT_RENAME_* flags are just aliases of RENAME_* flags and we don't need to include them.
> > +# AT_HANDLE_* flags are only meaningful for name_to_handle_at, which we don't support.
> >  grep -E $regex ${linux_fcntl} | \
> >         grep -v AT_EACCESS | \
> >         grep -v AT_STATX_SYNC_TYPE | \
> > +       grep -Ev "AT_RENAME_(NOREPLACE|EXCHANGE|WHITEOUT)" | \
> > +       grep -Ev "AT_HANDLE_(FID|MNT_ID_UNIQUE)" | \
> >         sed -r "s/$regex/\2 \1/g"       | \
> >         xargs printf "\t[ilog2(%s) + 1] = \"%s\",\n"
> >  printf "};\n"  
> 
> I have applied that by hand for today.  Please submit it and get it
> applied.

I am still applying this build fix patch.
-- 
Cheers,
Stephen Rothwell

[-- Attachment #2: OpenPGP digital signature --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 488 bytes --]

  reply	other threads:[~2024-09-10  0:23 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 97+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2024-09-02 23:27 linux-next: build failure after merge of the vfs-brauner tree Stephen Rothwell
2024-09-03  2:41 ` Aleksa Sarai
2024-09-05  0:58   ` Stephen Rothwell
2024-09-10  0:23     ` Stephen Rothwell [this message]
2024-09-10  8:50       ` Christian Brauner
2024-09-10 11:12         ` Stephen Rothwell
2024-09-12 10:23           ` Christian Brauner
2024-09-12 11:24             ` Stephen Rothwell
2024-09-10 14:26         ` Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo
  -- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2026-03-25 12:32 Mark Brown
2026-03-26 13:36 ` Christian Brauner
2026-03-27 17:48   ` Mark Brown
2026-03-13 13:00 Mark Brown
2026-03-23 13:56 ` Mark Brown
2026-03-23 15:37   ` Christian Brauner
2026-03-24 13:28     ` Mark Brown
2026-03-26 13:42       ` Christian Brauner
2026-01-27 11:45 Mark Brown
2026-02-02 14:58 ` Mark Brown
2026-02-04 14:31   ` Mark Brown
2026-02-06 12:19     ` Christian Brauner
2026-02-08 20:55       ` Mark Brown
2026-02-09  1:14         ` Al Viro
2026-01-19 14:30 Mark Brown
2026-01-20  6:55 ` kernel test robot
2026-01-20  8:39 ` kernel test robot
2025-11-16 21:43 Stephen Rothwell
2025-11-16 22:23 ` Jeff Layton
2025-11-17  2:16   ` Stephen Rothwell
2025-11-28  0:04     ` Stephen Rothwell
2025-11-28  9:53       ` Christian Brauner
2025-11-05 22:49 Stephen Rothwell
2025-11-28 10:09 ` Christian Brauner
2025-11-05  0:10 Stephen Rothwell
2025-10-30 21:35 Stephen Rothwell
2025-09-04  1:33 Stephen Rothwell
2025-09-04  7:44 ` schuster.simon
2025-09-08  2:02 ` Stephen Rothwell
2025-09-10  0:49   ` Stephen Rothwell
2025-09-11 12:13     ` Bagas Sanjaya
2025-09-15  6:35     ` schuster.simon
2025-09-15 14:11     ` Christian Brauner
2025-08-31 23:34 Stephen Rothwell
2025-09-01  4:44 ` Onur Özkan
2025-08-17 23:05 Stephen Rothwell
2025-08-19 23:42 ` Stephen Rothwell
2025-08-20 22:54   ` Stephen Rothwell
2025-08-20 23:16     ` Andrew Morton
2025-08-20 23:15 ` Stephen Rothwell
2025-06-18 23:45 Stephen Rothwell
2025-06-19  5:22 ` Lorenzo Stoakes
2025-05-21 10:49 Stephen Rothwell
2025-05-23 10:14 ` Christian Brauner
2025-03-17 23:12 Stephen Rothwell
2025-03-18 15:24 ` Mike Marshall
2025-03-18 15:37   ` Arnd Bergmann
2025-03-18 15:42     ` Mike Marshall
2025-03-17 12:56 Stephen Rothwell
2024-12-11 22:54 Stephen Rothwell
2024-08-19 23:03 Stephen Rothwell
2024-08-06  0:57 Stephen Rothwell
2024-07-26  0:00 Stephen Rothwell
2024-07-29 23:00 ` Stephen Rothwell
2024-07-30 12:12   ` Christian Brauner
2024-06-27 14:08 Mark Brown
2024-04-04  2:24 Stephen Rothwell
2024-04-04  7:50 ` David Howells
2024-02-18 23:44 Stephen Rothwell
2024-03-12 23:41 ` Stephen Rothwell
2024-03-12 23:45   ` Chuck Lever III
2024-03-13  3:10     ` Stephen Rothwell
2024-02-11 23:52 Stephen Rothwell
2024-02-12  0:36 ` Kent Overstreet
2024-01-23  1:52 Stephen Rothwell
2024-01-24  1:20 ` Stephen Rothwell
2024-01-24 11:13   ` Christian Brauner
2024-01-24 11:35     ` Stephen Rothwell
2024-01-25 16:21       ` Christian Brauner
2023-12-21  0:18 Stephen Rothwell
2023-12-21  1:32 ` Matthew Wilcox
2023-12-21 23:41 ` Stephen Rothwell
2023-10-31  1:07 Stephen Rothwell
2023-10-18 23:54 Stephen Rothwell
2023-10-19  9:17 ` Christian Brauner
2023-10-02 22:30 Stephen Rothwell
2023-10-03 13:24 ` Christian Brauner
2023-09-28  0:54 Stephen Rothwell
2023-10-02 11:21 ` Jan Kara
2023-10-02 11:26   ` Jan Kara
2023-10-02 21:24     ` Stephen Rothwell
2023-10-03 13:27   ` Kent Overstreet
2023-10-04 15:46     ` Jan Kara
2023-10-09 14:00       ` Christian Brauner
2023-09-28  0:39 Stephen Rothwell
2023-09-28 14:52 ` Christian Brauner
2023-08-03  0:03 Stephen Rothwell
2023-08-03 10:06 ` Jan Kara

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20240910102332.4f171bde@canb.auug.org.au \
    --to=sfr@canb.auug.org.au \
    --cc=brauner@kernel.org \
    --cc=cyphar@cyphar.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-next@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox