public inbox for linux-next@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
* [PATCH] perf: Fix topology_sibling_cpumask check warning on ARM
@ 2024-09-12 14:50 kan.liang
  2024-09-12 15:53 ` Steven Price
  0 siblings, 1 reply; 2+ messages in thread
From: kan.liang @ 2024-09-12 14:50 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: peterz, mingo, linux-kernel, linux-next
  Cc: tglx, hpa, sfr, steven.price, Kan Liang

From: Kan Liang <kan.liang@linux.intel.com>

The below warning is triggered when building with arm
multi_v7_defconfig.

kernel/events/core.c: In function 'perf_event_setup_cpumask':
kernel/events/core.c:14012:13: warning: the comparison will always
evaluate as 'true' for the address of 'thread_sibling' will never be
NULL [-Waddress]
14012 |         if (!topology_sibling_cpumask(cpu)) {

The perf_event_init_cpu() may be invoked at the early boot stage, while
the topology_*_cpumask hasn't been initialized yet. The check is to
specially handle the case, and initialize the perf_online_<domain>_masks
on the boot CPU.
X86 uses a per-cpu cpumask pointer, which could be NULL at the early
boot stage. However, ARM uses a global variable, which never be NULL.

Use perf_online_mask as an indicator instead. Only initialize the
perf_online_<domain>_masks when perf_online_mask is empty.

Fix a typo as well.

Fixes: 4ba4f1afb6a9 ("perf: Generic hotplug support for a PMU with a scope")
Reported-by: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@canb.auug.org.au>
Closes: https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/20240911153854.240bbc1f@canb.auug.org.au/
Reported-by: Steven Price <steven.price@arm.com>
Closes: https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/1835eb6d-3e05-47f3-9eae-507ce165c3bf@arm.com/
Signed-off-by: Kan Liang <kan.liang@linux.intel.com>
---
 kernel/events/core.c | 10 +++++-----
 1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)

diff --git a/kernel/events/core.c b/kernel/events/core.c
index 7a028474caef..20e97c1aa4d6 100644
--- a/kernel/events/core.c
+++ b/kernel/events/core.c
@@ -13954,21 +13954,19 @@ static void perf_event_setup_cpumask(unsigned int cpu)
 	struct cpumask *pmu_cpumask;
 	unsigned int scope;
 
-	cpumask_set_cpu(cpu, perf_online_mask);
-
 	/*
 	 * Early boot stage, the cpumask hasn't been set yet.
 	 * The perf_online_<domain>_masks includes the first CPU of each domain.
-	 * Always uncondifionally set the boot CPU for the perf_online_<domain>_masks.
+	 * Always unconditionally set the boot CPU for the perf_online_<domain>_masks.
 	 */
-	if (!topology_sibling_cpumask(cpu)) {
+	if (cpumask_empty(perf_online_mask)) {
 		for (scope = PERF_PMU_SCOPE_NONE + 1; scope < PERF_PMU_MAX_SCOPE; scope++) {
 			pmu_cpumask = perf_scope_cpumask(scope);
 			if (WARN_ON_ONCE(!pmu_cpumask))
 				continue;
 			cpumask_set_cpu(cpu, pmu_cpumask);
 		}
-		return;
+		goto end;
 	}
 
 	for (scope = PERF_PMU_SCOPE_NONE + 1; scope < PERF_PMU_MAX_SCOPE; scope++) {
@@ -13983,6 +13981,8 @@ static void perf_event_setup_cpumask(unsigned int cpu)
 		    cpumask_any_and(pmu_cpumask, cpumask) >= nr_cpu_ids)
 			cpumask_set_cpu(cpu, pmu_cpumask);
 	}
+end:
+	cpumask_set_cpu(cpu, perf_online_mask);
 }
 
 int perf_event_init_cpu(unsigned int cpu)
-- 
2.38.1


^ permalink raw reply related	[flat|nested] 2+ messages in thread

* Re: [PATCH] perf: Fix topology_sibling_cpumask check warning on ARM
  2024-09-12 14:50 [PATCH] perf: Fix topology_sibling_cpumask check warning on ARM kan.liang
@ 2024-09-12 15:53 ` Steven Price
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 2+ messages in thread
From: Steven Price @ 2024-09-12 15:53 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: kan.liang, peterz, mingo, linux-kernel, linux-next; +Cc: tglx, hpa, sfr

On 12/09/2024 15:50, kan.liang@linux.intel.com wrote:
> From: Kan Liang <kan.liang@linux.intel.com>
> 
> The below warning is triggered when building with arm
> multi_v7_defconfig.
> 
> kernel/events/core.c: In function 'perf_event_setup_cpumask':
> kernel/events/core.c:14012:13: warning: the comparison will always
> evaluate as 'true' for the address of 'thread_sibling' will never be
> NULL [-Waddress]
> 14012 |         if (!topology_sibling_cpumask(cpu)) {
> 
> The perf_event_init_cpu() may be invoked at the early boot stage, while
> the topology_*_cpumask hasn't been initialized yet. The check is to
> specially handle the case, and initialize the perf_online_<domain>_masks
> on the boot CPU.
> X86 uses a per-cpu cpumask pointer, which could be NULL at the early
> boot stage. However, ARM uses a global variable, which never be NULL.
> 
> Use perf_online_mask as an indicator instead. Only initialize the
> perf_online_<domain>_masks when perf_online_mask is empty.
> 
> Fix a typo as well.
> 
> Fixes: 4ba4f1afb6a9 ("perf: Generic hotplug support for a PMU with a scope")
> Reported-by: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@canb.auug.org.au>
> Closes: https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/20240911153854.240bbc1f@canb.auug.org.au/
> Reported-by: Steven Price <steven.price@arm.com>
> Closes: https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/1835eb6d-3e05-47f3-9eae-507ce165c3bf@arm.com/
> Signed-off-by: Kan Liang <kan.liang@linux.intel.com>

Tested-by: Steven Price <steven.price@arm.com>

Thanks,
Steve

> ---
>  kernel/events/core.c | 10 +++++-----
>  1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/kernel/events/core.c b/kernel/events/core.c
> index 7a028474caef..20e97c1aa4d6 100644
> --- a/kernel/events/core.c
> +++ b/kernel/events/core.c
> @@ -13954,21 +13954,19 @@ static void perf_event_setup_cpumask(unsigned int cpu)
>  	struct cpumask *pmu_cpumask;
>  	unsigned int scope;
>  
> -	cpumask_set_cpu(cpu, perf_online_mask);
> -
>  	/*
>  	 * Early boot stage, the cpumask hasn't been set yet.
>  	 * The perf_online_<domain>_masks includes the first CPU of each domain.
> -	 * Always uncondifionally set the boot CPU for the perf_online_<domain>_masks.
> +	 * Always unconditionally set the boot CPU for the perf_online_<domain>_masks.
>  	 */
> -	if (!topology_sibling_cpumask(cpu)) {
> +	if (cpumask_empty(perf_online_mask)) {
>  		for (scope = PERF_PMU_SCOPE_NONE + 1; scope < PERF_PMU_MAX_SCOPE; scope++) {
>  			pmu_cpumask = perf_scope_cpumask(scope);
>  			if (WARN_ON_ONCE(!pmu_cpumask))
>  				continue;
>  			cpumask_set_cpu(cpu, pmu_cpumask);
>  		}
> -		return;
> +		goto end;
>  	}
>  
>  	for (scope = PERF_PMU_SCOPE_NONE + 1; scope < PERF_PMU_MAX_SCOPE; scope++) {
> @@ -13983,6 +13981,8 @@ static void perf_event_setup_cpumask(unsigned int cpu)
>  		    cpumask_any_and(pmu_cpumask, cpumask) >= nr_cpu_ids)
>  			cpumask_set_cpu(cpu, pmu_cpumask);
>  	}
> +end:
> +	cpumask_set_cpu(cpu, perf_online_mask);
>  }
>  
>  int perf_event_init_cpu(unsigned int cpu)


^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 2+ messages in thread

end of thread, other threads:[~2024-09-12 15:53 UTC | newest]

Thread overview: 2+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2024-09-12 14:50 [PATCH] perf: Fix topology_sibling_cpumask check warning on ARM kan.liang
2024-09-12 15:53 ` Steven Price

This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox