linux-next: manual merge of the random tree with the memblock tree

linux-next: manual merge of the random tree with the memblock tree

[Stephen Rothwell]

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1205 bytes --]

Hi all,

Today's linux-next merge of the random tree got a conflict in:

  tools/include/linux/linkage.h

between commit:

  d68c08173b70 ("memblock tests: include export.h in linkage.h as kernel dose")

from the memblock tree and commit:

  9fcce2aaea8a ("selftests/vDSO: fix include order in build of test_vdso_chacha")

from the random tree.

I fixed it up (see below) and can carry the fix as necessary. This
is now fixed as far as linux-next is concerned, but any non trivial
conflicts should be mentioned to your upstream maintainer when your tree
is submitted for merging.  You may also want to consider cooperating
with the maintainer of the conflicting tree to minimise any particularly
complex conflicts.

-- 
Cheers,
Stephen Rothwell

diff --cc tools/include/linux/linkage.h
index 20dee24d7e1b,a48ff086899c..000000000000
--- a/tools/include/linux/linkage.h
+++ b/tools/include/linux/linkage.h
@@@ -1,6 -1,8 +1,10 @@@
  #ifndef _TOOLS_INCLUDE_LINUX_LINKAGE_H
  #define _TOOLS_INCLUDE_LINUX_LINKAGE_H
  
 +#include <linux/export.h>
 +
+ #define SYM_FUNC_START(x) .globl x; x:
+ 
+ #define SYM_FUNC_END(x)
+ 
  #endif /* _TOOLS_INCLUDE_LINUX_LINKAGE_H */

[-- Attachment #2: OpenPGP digital signature --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 488 bytes --]

Re: linux-next: manual merge of the random tree with the memblock tree

[Stephen Rothwell]

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1432 bytes --]

Hi all,

On Tue, 27 Aug 2024 15:04:53 +1000 Stephen Rothwell <sfr@canb.auug.org.au> wrote:
>
> Today's linux-next merge of the random tree got a conflict in:
> 
>   tools/include/linux/linkage.h
> 
> between commit:
> 
>   d68c08173b70 ("memblock tests: include export.h in linkage.h as kernel dose")
> 
> from the memblock tree and commit:
> 
>   9fcce2aaea8a ("selftests/vDSO: fix include order in build of test_vdso_chacha")
> 
> from the random tree.
> 
> I fixed it up (see below) and can carry the fix as necessary. This
> is now fixed as far as linux-next is concerned, but any non trivial
> conflicts should be mentioned to your upstream maintainer when your tree
> is submitted for merging.  You may also want to consider cooperating
> with the maintainer of the conflicting tree to minimise any particularly
> complex conflicts.
> 
> diff --cc tools/include/linux/linkage.h
> index 20dee24d7e1b,a48ff086899c..000000000000
> --- a/tools/include/linux/linkage.h
> +++ b/tools/include/linux/linkage.h
> @@@ -1,6 -1,8 +1,10 @@@
>   #ifndef _TOOLS_INCLUDE_LINUX_LINKAGE_H
>   #define _TOOLS_INCLUDE_LINUX_LINKAGE_H
>   
>  +#include <linux/export.h>
>  +
> + #define SYM_FUNC_START(x) .globl x; x:
> + 
> + #define SYM_FUNC_END(x)
> + 
>   #endif /* _TOOLS_INCLUDE_LINUX_LINKAGE_H */

This is now a conflict between the memblock tree and Linus' tree.

-- 
Cheers,
Stephen Rothwell

[-- Attachment #2: OpenPGP digital signature --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 484 bytes --]

Re: linux-next: manual merge of the random tree with the memblock tree

[Wei Yang]

On Thu, Sep 19, 2024 at 02:53:56PM +1000, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
>Hi all,
>
>On Tue, 27 Aug 2024 15:04:53 +1000 Stephen Rothwell <sfr@canb.auug.org.au> wrote:
>>
>> Today's linux-next merge of the random tree got a conflict in:
>> 
>>   tools/include/linux/linkage.h
>> 
>> between commit:
>> 
>>   d68c08173b70 ("memblock tests: include export.h in linkage.h as kernel dose")
>> 
>> from the memblock tree and commit:
>> 
>>   9fcce2aaea8a ("selftests/vDSO: fix include order in build of test_vdso_chacha")
>> 
>> from the random tree.
>> 
>> I fixed it up (see below) and can carry the fix as necessary. This
>> is now fixed as far as linux-next is concerned, but any non trivial
>> conflicts should be mentioned to your upstream maintainer when your tree
>> is submitted for merging.  You may also want to consider cooperating
>> with the maintainer of the conflicting tree to minimise any particularly
>> complex conflicts.
>> 
>> diff --cc tools/include/linux/linkage.h
>> index 20dee24d7e1b,a48ff086899c..000000000000
>> --- a/tools/include/linux/linkage.h
>> +++ b/tools/include/linux/linkage.h
>> @@@ -1,6 -1,8 +1,10 @@@
>>   #ifndef _TOOLS_INCLUDE_LINUX_LINKAGE_H
>>   #define _TOOLS_INCLUDE_LINUX_LINKAGE_H
>>   
>>  +#include <linux/export.h>
>>  +
>> + #define SYM_FUNC_START(x) .globl x; x:
>> + 
>> + #define SYM_FUNC_END(x)
>> + 
>>   #endif /* _TOOLS_INCLUDE_LINUX_LINKAGE_H */
>
>This is now a conflict between the memblock tree and Linus' tree.
>

Do I need to send a new version? 

>-- 
>Cheers,
>Stephen Rothwell



-- 
Wei Yang
Help you, Help me

Re: linux-next: manual merge of the random tree with the memblock tree

[Stephen Rothwell]

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 267 bytes --]

Hi Wei,

On Thu, 19 Sep 2024 23:45:57 +0000 Wei Yang <richard.weiyang@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> Do I need to send a new version? 

No, this was just a reminder to the tree maintainer to tell Linus about
the conflict in their PR.

-- 
Cheers,
Stephen Rothwell

[-- Attachment #2: OpenPGP digital signature --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 488 bytes --]