From: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
To: Brahmajit Das <brahmajit.xyz@gmail.com>
Cc: david@redhat.com, gorcunov@openvz.org,
linux-next@vger.kernel.org, sfr@canb.auug.org.au
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 1/1] fs/proc: Fix build with GCC 15 due to -Werror=unterminated-string-initialization
Date: Mon, 7 Oct 2024 19:08:13 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20241007190813.f4effd5788cf7362a4fda19f@linux-foundation.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20241005063700.2241027-1-brahmajit.xyz@gmail.com>
On Sat, 5 Oct 2024 12:07:00 +0530 Brahmajit Das <brahmajit.xyz@gmail.com> wrote:
> show show_smap_vma_flags() has been using misspelled initializer in
> mnemonics[] - it needed to initialize 2 element array of char and it
> used NUL-padded 2 character string literals (i.e. 3-element
> initializer).
>
> This has been spotted by gcc-15[*]; prior to that gcc quietly dropped
> the 3rd eleemnt of initializers. To fix this we are increasing the size
> of mnemonics[] (from mnemonics[BITS_PER_LONG][2] to
> mnemonics[BITS_PER_LONG][3]) to accomodate the NUL-padded string
> literals.
>
> This also helps us in simplyfying the logic for printing of the flags as
> instead of printing each character from the mnemonics[], we can just
> print the mnemonics[] using seq_printf.
>
> [*]: fs/proc/task_mmu.c:917:49: error: initializer-string for array of ‘char’ is too long [-Werror=unterminate d-string-initialization]
> 917 | [0 ... (BITS_PER_LONG-1)] = "??",
> | ^~~~
> fs/proc/task_mmu.c:917:49: error: initializer-string for array of ‘char’ is too long [-Werror=unterminate d-string-initialization]
> fs/proc/task_mmu.c:917:49: error: initializer-string for array of ‘char’ is too long [-Werror=unterminate d-string-initialization]
> fs/proc/task_mmu.c:917:49: error: initializer-string for array of ‘char’ is too long [-Werror=unterminate d-string-initialization]
> fs/proc/task_mmu.c:917:49: error: initializer-string for array of ‘char’ is too long [-Werror=unterminate d-string-initialization]
> fs/proc/task_mmu.c:917:49: error: initializer-string for array of ‘char’ is too long [-Werror=unterminate d-string-initialization]
> Cc: david@redhat.com, gorcunov@openvz.org, linux-next@vger.kernel.org, sfr@canb.auug.org.au
It is strange to cc only linux-next. It isn't really a development
mailing list. Please include an appropriate development list and/or
linux-kernel on patches.
> --- a/fs/proc/task_mmu.c
> +++ b/fs/proc/task_mmu.c
> @@ -909,8 +909,15 @@ static void show_smap_vma_flags(struct seq_file *m, struct vm_area_struct *vma)
> {
> /*
> * Don't forget to update Documentation/ on changes.
> + *
> + * The length of the second argument of mnemonics[]
> + * needs to be 3 instead of previously set 2
> + * (i.e. from [BITS_PER_LONG][2] to [BITS_PER_LONG][3])
> + * to avoid spurious
> + * -Werror=unterminated-string-initialization warning
> + * with GCC 15
> */
> - static const char mnemonics[BITS_PER_LONG][2] = {
> + static const char mnemonics[BITS_PER_LONG][3] = {
> /*
> * In case if we meet a flag we don't know about.
> */
> @@ -987,11 +994,8 @@ static void show_smap_vma_flags(struct seq_file *m, struct vm_area_struct *vma)
> for (i = 0; i < BITS_PER_LONG; i++) {
> if (!mnemonics[i][0])
> continue;
> - if (vma->vm_flags & (1UL << i)) {
> - seq_putc(m, mnemonics[i][0]);
> - seq_putc(m, mnemonics[i][1]);
> - seq_putc(m, ' ');
> - }
> + if (vma->vm_flags & (1UL << i))
> + seq_printf(m, "%s ", mnemonics[i]);
> }
> seq_putc(m, '\n');
> }
Patch looks good. I'll add this to the changelog:
Stephen pointed out:
: The C standard explicitly allows for a string initializer to be too long
: due to the NUL byte at the end ... so this warning may be overzealous.
but let's make the warning go away anwyay.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2024-10-08 2:08 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 11+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2024-10-02 8:05 [PATCH 1/1] fs: proc: Fix build with GCC 15 due to -Werror=unterminated-string-initialization Brahmajit Das
2024-10-02 8:09 ` [PATCH v2 " Brahmajit Das
2024-10-02 21:48 ` Andrew Morton
2024-10-02 23:30 ` Stephen Rothwell
2024-10-02 23:39 ` Stephen Rothwell
2024-10-04 20:16 ` Brahmajit
2024-10-04 21:12 ` Brahmajit
2024-10-04 21:58 ` Andrew Morton
2024-10-05 6:37 ` [PATCH v3 1/1] fs/proc: " Brahmajit Das
2024-10-08 2:08 ` Andrew Morton [this message]
2024-10-28 8:02 ` Cyrill Gorcunov
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20241007190813.f4effd5788cf7362a4fda19f@linux-foundation.org \
--to=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=brahmajit.xyz@gmail.com \
--cc=david@redhat.com \
--cc=gorcunov@openvz.org \
--cc=linux-next@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=sfr@canb.auug.org.au \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).