From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from smtp.kernel.org (aws-us-west-2-korg-mail-1.web.codeaurora.org [10.30.226.201]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id C32DB1B2193; Wed, 16 Oct 2024 07:55:14 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=10.30.226.201 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1729065314; cv=none; b=Pq/sNBokee9rXmuZNq7ssSII394oLrK+2sG6mLiL1gmJU/DvSSjTzaUvaa16Wl+/NcPlJulRvrrTP+215nrH9ydk7m692GrKiAWgsQDLlMGMOnI1O0HWmVz/gtKDVd0RJlwnO2mjW6EfsyvJd5rtEa/RP+2m2+YcQFV5zgs/rQc= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1729065314; c=relaxed/simple; bh=brAsTdn7C7KHcMxE1e6vxSmsli6F8gtG8xq9FmDaz/U=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:Message-ID:References:MIME-Version: Content-Type:Content-Disposition:In-Reply-To; b=qcti3umYNXfoGPuM2uAgb9BsqjjtDt7juztyhNujQRul1QCPk0exkjRlkuxwSnFhP6wuTUc7aRYRj5ZXgPqSWhPRxrM0MSM6fh1s27Za6D5dh2XIqqmbNejFV/9pYRXsZolmNWQUYq2evAxCo7RTVWZaz3Ga6GFZCYn9k/tOeBs= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=kernel.org header.i=@kernel.org header.b=R/Pt+akR; arc=none smtp.client-ip=10.30.226.201 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=kernel.org header.i=@kernel.org header.b="R/Pt+akR" Received: by smtp.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 6E6EDC4CECE; Wed, 16 Oct 2024 07:55:13 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=kernel.org; s=k20201202; t=1729065314; bh=brAsTdn7C7KHcMxE1e6vxSmsli6F8gtG8xq9FmDaz/U=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:References:In-Reply-To:From; b=R/Pt+akRym6xgfKLh6NHDhVZJSxYlh71uZMA7vkW93aAcYbBIY4p9W8o6n4SRsJES zidEIbeRaE+2mmZg/BHSZUl1tEP2jWfvbAihJqA/IQJK5/NQFAu6S9vTqLCSpJwG3Q x6KE840yEI3ArnwH8xjY6GtB5JjFaI24H830PRlLeMZ3bJHrWr9O+mR3ic+wFCVfXl FCEEokNu+BVqwNEjRlB3oCnbfIruiMFkg+iWq2OILXhXlB//HnHvzHta4/uXFmjHp/ NULe+/vXEIN6Ja57sqJtn3s6EYKsy68cbj2Qgd+iTlp0Dpe4GKqBGlS7qdlymBvC8s a/drQDUpvmjxg== Date: Wed, 16 Oct 2024 08:55:10 +0100 From: Lee Jones To: Stephen Rothwell Cc: Mark Brown , Liam Girdwood , Linux Kernel Mailing List , Linux Next Mailing List Subject: Re: linux-next: duplicate patches in the regulator tree Message-ID: <20241016075510.GL8348@google.com> References: <20241016135943.24e1fab0@canb.auug.org.au> Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: linux-next@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit In-Reply-To: <20241016135943.24e1fab0@canb.auug.org.au> On Wed, 16 Oct 2024, Stephen Rothwell wrote: > Hi all, > > The following commits are also in the mfd tree as different commits > (but the same patches): > > d7a5f27342a8 ("mfd: sec-core: add s2dos05 support") > ef9690c04f3b ("dt-bindings: mfd: add samsung,s2dos05") And these ones do not follow the style expected by the subsystem. Mark can you please remove these without reverting and further dirtying MFD's history please? One little rebase isn't going to hurt in the long run. :) > These are commits > > 59d9022639ed ("mfd: sec-core: Add support for the Samsung s2dos05") > 1d6e7612a129 ("dt-bindings: mfd: Add support for the samsung,s2dos05") > > in the mfd tree. > > -- > Cheers, > Stephen Rothwell -- Lee Jones [李琼斯]