From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from smtp.kernel.org (aws-us-west-2-korg-mail-1.web.codeaurora.org [10.30.226.201]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id DC5142170C5; Thu, 24 Oct 2024 22:52:29 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=10.30.226.201 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1729810350; cv=none; b=o07Ckp1I6MmzXs8tQ3hX/+YBSsCmYB+cSMYIN6xtNHZiw20dYZAZHTNCLq9RlIfdfUEbJtnrIKU2o7R4hmbr20+sT0NuQGvX6XouFNBFXmpn/24dKPJhFYs07Xs5h9Dh6ZTWMqekNoV1cBfhSy+mKRMqXOwt8rfcJacWNyNOKPM= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1729810350; c=relaxed/simple; bh=umCeUZZLaMCvRPh8tFWCZwys65bRXOPtPWMR7MF+zH8=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:Message-ID:References:MIME-Version: Content-Type:Content-Disposition:In-Reply-To; b=VJjxaBC6FOj0F4JFChSBglvYa9DKiHRf4gT36tZDw2VclE0NUM/dj6tSASrVp2Z90TE9YS2UYXcWKNr5hQfAULDnv2QVyIBQDlnm0JzDe0HD1+SzaOn2WemV7LzX9DEMC1WIE1j6Pz+0/UDIpz/8eTna0/dWNTcEN9i6kvTMpw4= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=kernel.org header.i=@kernel.org header.b=Kv7mqhVJ; arc=none smtp.client-ip=10.30.226.201 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=kernel.org header.i=@kernel.org header.b="Kv7mqhVJ" Received: by smtp.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 76DA2C4CEC7; Thu, 24 Oct 2024 22:52:28 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=kernel.org; s=k20201202; t=1729810349; bh=umCeUZZLaMCvRPh8tFWCZwys65bRXOPtPWMR7MF+zH8=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:References:In-Reply-To:From; b=Kv7mqhVJvkYsj5v9++OkIwZ1+0+pRhSxX++nBH/8v6HL1oS8An2yi+bqiFsWOmZHr OjNn9wrXCFeSap7V92KaUJLFAjbLk1UyoVH/5XSjCj4ipndz98xkhU3gSebHQBGuym KTDqGbAtfy8Fi8XFi7UFbPQSzSafYE7rg8boFZKIpYkF6flu3pDAbFio/Y1wdGLoyP wCX5Amt/qq22FHssyr9h9/BeArht4yQoLKLilxrt+MAfxv7blCCHvPUaMQmhr04Yia 9i80ddf/b3QiC6sBrubuZaTKsB8jPykfhArpNS7IEBG3vmfSRlXyK1tfX0WWtZIiZ6 VXPJ0SOWsI2AQ== Date: Thu, 24 Oct 2024 23:52:26 +0100 From: Conor Dooley To: Stephen Rothwell Cc: Conor Dooley , Linux Kernel Mailing List , Linux Next Mailing List Subject: Re: linux-next: duplicate patch in the riscv-soc-fixes tree Message-ID: <20241024-pleading-grub-e50a759dc9c5@spud> References: <20241025094819.5e01ddc5@canb.auug.org.au> Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: linux-next@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha256; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="/I56q7nvnU0k7Y/f" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20241025094819.5e01ddc5@canb.auug.org.au> --/I56q7nvnU0k7Y/f Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Fri, Oct 25, 2024 at 09:48:19AM +1100, Stephen Rothwell wrote: > Hi all, >=20 > The following commit is also in the riscv-dt-fixes tree as a different > commit (but the same patch): >=20 > 384f2024e1a1 ("MAINTAINERS: invert Misc RISC-V SoC Support's pattern") >=20 > This is commit >=20 > 7d9d88890f04 ("MAINTAINERS: invert Misc RISC-V SoC Support's pattern") >=20 > in the riscv-dt-fixes tree. Ye, harmless. I found out the other day that this patch had not been sent as a for v6.11-rcX. I'll drop it from one of the branches, thanks. --/I56q7nvnU0k7Y/f Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- iHUEABYIAB0WIQRh246EGq/8RLhDjO14tDGHoIJi0gUCZxrPqgAKCRB4tDGHoIJi 0puHAP9YhE4VFbpalERztM4rtM7/B3Ui+bVFUQedgdGYjXy9xwD+JVVKnnSCXMoA 0iZUZZdTgKD6sj8YE/LX/VtLt/LN5wU= =gEhc -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --/I56q7nvnU0k7Y/f--