From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from mail.rothwell.id.au (gimli.rothwell.id.au [103.230.158.156]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 39B6D7464; Tue, 29 Oct 2024 06:13:02 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=103.230.158.156 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1730182386; cv=none; b=p5l7o8meIVPJqRxsNwquTHCJoqKwcnZagcpidjBEApXgFQ7WbLiaU9IXBdfS35mHz4f2fQiJw+3i6DWBrrBXfGosGVbyoexjtERhb76NpEfoQT4C4OEYjOOWWemaz+qY6rlrpKljtIu8sazF0RrMGMFABUtLPcLFm/5dj9rN9sk= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1730182386; c=relaxed/simple; bh=ch844stOOcYt++jDmvHi7Q1K19GvVMurzsLZBKno57U=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:Message-ID:In-Reply-To:References: MIME-Version:Content-Type; b=V2UhjI2xo7Lw3U5jGy3IDw5vV5YSj3LQWuIv/UGpFI3Z8OCyC8vqBTDshYlEjllWt2r9DSWGVtLPrWCvFl/9qUU1OuNe3Cv6WeGzeLbFTperE8PUf5Y2D2Af5g0Q0A02Lw4ifTCaxjb7YDHFG8a2ZZS+ToRjZn6CAEJsTl9Jt7I= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=rothwell.id.au; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=rothwell.id.au; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=rothwell.id.au header.i=@rothwell.id.au header.b=lJ3Go5Gn; arc=none smtp.client-ip=103.230.158.156 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=rothwell.id.au Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=rothwell.id.au Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=rothwell.id.au header.i=@rothwell.id.au header.b="lJ3Go5Gn" DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=rothwell.id.au; s=201702; t=1730181937; bh=ese/ICA2Vd7ZwEi5Vtpit6xyLjkPxy2lWxF4PC/6sJY=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:In-Reply-To:References:From; b=lJ3Go5GnR47ldvd+Uyr1lHlAnX0Sw05bo6hOODee822i/u0Fnppwn2wyxQYzCypV5 ggTwN4Y2agIuBXTAPNIaGoLaT4SLwcMSaDQRnhr8REdI0H0YjV9lK4RENgRdzsgq98 gIuOvJmqy8OjqqMhR6GwNUaL0dNo+quV2U1Efz/jUEr+K8x5NDIlJqE0EEF8tFSqwj s0PGwr/pR20/2tXXyP81fayzos7vFfvudoOqTqYIVT/eYFNmdHjg0WcCpCIr1ZUt2m 3yjbhc3KGrcNsk5fBk2//6R5q4tOWE820bakUYIKuDn5DzOs6jiZPPUjrSaZcZeiEy xlOrBsMOWplaw== Received: from authenticated.rothwell.id.au (localhost [127.0.0.1]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by mail.rothwell.id.au (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 4Xd09W0XXQz6M; Tue, 29 Oct 2024 17:05:35 +1100 (AEDT) Date: Tue, 29 Oct 2024 17:05:33 +1100 From: Stephen Rothwell To: Andrew Morton Cc: Stephen Rothwell , Thomas Gleixner , Ingo Molnar , "H. Peter Anvin" , Peter Zijlstra , Linux Kernel Mailing List , Linux Next Mailing List Subject: Re: linux-next: duplicate patch in the tip tree Message-ID: <20241029170533.5592ab42@oak> In-Reply-To: <20241028213040.e5d72b2f56971ceb5c80395b@linux-foundation.org> References: <20241029133407.3580be1a@canb.auug.org.au> <20241028213040.e5d72b2f56971ceb5c80395b@linux-foundation.org> X-Mailer: Claws Mail 4.3.0 (GTK 3.24.43; x86_64-redhat-linux-gnu) Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: linux-next@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="Sig_/7psVxqKYd=1bKJnYCTBwJxq"; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; micalg=pgp-sha256 --Sig_/7psVxqKYd=1bKJnYCTBwJxq Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Hi Andrew, On Mon, 28 Oct 2024 21:30:40 -0700 Andrew Morton wrote: > > On Tue, 29 Oct 2024 13:34:07 +1100 Stephen Rothwell wrote: >=20 > > The following commit is also in the mm-hotfixes tree as a different com= mit > > (but the same patch): > >=20 > > 9c70b2a33cd2 ("sched/numa: Fix the potential null pointer dereference= in task_numa_work()") > >=20 > > This is commit > >=20 > > 82c4d6b6dace ("sched/numa: fix the potential null pointer dereference= in task_numa_work()") > >=20 > > in the mm-hotfixes-unstable branch of the mm-hotfixes tree. =20 >=20 > Thanks, but... What tip branch is it in? Matters because: is that > branch destined for 6.12.x? Its in the sched/urgent branch, so probably destined for Linus fairly soon. But the tip guys would know better than I. --=20 Cheers, Stephen Rothwell --Sig_/7psVxqKYd=1bKJnYCTBwJxq Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Description: OpenPGP digital signature -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- iQEzBAEBCAAdFiEENIC96giZ81tWdLgKAVBC80lX0GwFAmcgey0ACgkQAVBC80lX 0GytDwf/aS8kX6z2isQPahD9pxomMZcAjCSiSnBwuM0/78hvomVK9QEL8IzLA2YB vgD2iKwlG6HYbRGzqhiBIx/RJyurZPICffSfc2T4/VZF98OlTKH1j9GdrPvA+CiT e+ZctoeSZ2s7YOo4HHtVbIMapTuswKROxm8lWZ+aCrr6/+oB10M8oesHKLo9qpD1 MInrwUK3fDuKOHTtxgCnS+sLBR5lKQMflgURZOFhZsl2Ynct6ljTkLkwCAHUroD5 jQGZq+tlwFV7MqDm/hploc5LEV2FrbWICVbMsTlMXW7fsKyn4Je8NhXRBBs07Omz 7BDewUOtf3XpccNhu+n2SKGEAu0vVQ== =nSse -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --Sig_/7psVxqKYd=1bKJnYCTBwJxq--