From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from smtp.kernel.org (aws-us-west-2-korg-mail-1.web.codeaurora.org [10.30.226.201]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 12DCB1DBB37; Thu, 7 Nov 2024 13:13:27 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=10.30.226.201 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1730985207; cv=none; b=r3k+fvDgtZiFAs2hjLiHErXDJD6u5/YUGPtX/H0D7cwZF4tNH4ND/Gariw0XizL8iXkoWbeebJ5ilGNiF8oa21SY4g+SJRzXNxeQd1GqZR2QCE98srOWQQAUhn5GI+fq1dHPHhwVkDDwZBTDRvJLSHkCzoVvht8un6ePbbWCa6Q= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1730985207; c=relaxed/simple; bh=MFt+M4rjh+5OaIZFVxuxfqcABZPm4DVZor5oXblzbw8=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:Message-ID:MIME-Version:Content-Type: Content-Disposition:In-Reply-To; b=FAk1ptcbO8/DyAprQja60CAov5mmeuTzY4QDA2E4svx34Trw5xmV66ShGFI5vsQohybNz01Z/2nVNV+vy3m/a1XxLmvErQL5FfU2ZGxF1J/1iyLLI/W+jUXh0Ju1ZvL0d/53IennDo2agV96nt/PZSFZWVNi23HJODPnnzuI+zY= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=kernel.org header.i=@kernel.org header.b=RBZeZxvX; arc=none smtp.client-ip=10.30.226.201 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=kernel.org header.i=@kernel.org header.b="RBZeZxvX" Received: by smtp.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id AEE91C4CECC; Thu, 7 Nov 2024 13:13:26 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=kernel.org; s=k20201202; t=1730985206; bh=MFt+M4rjh+5OaIZFVxuxfqcABZPm4DVZor5oXblzbw8=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:In-Reply-To:From; b=RBZeZxvXMvpSS6MbFdJ9kvcL0IgLJdkRVX6ccUje6ikcakykUAoIOS9p+l2NlIhvB 1zEyXYVeIVeMig9Zo21N4/bNUpdXH6qVo3YZT/RYpOtk242k7YOERDwoo2yBoLrJCm CC82wNiRkyFlDzvtL681LIP8w1MsnR2OEUfhwgY/VW3o4mYhARrt/o2EINrjN87Fei ZBkST5sdhTOGKiRlhiYdVP1Fhw4u60666AkMywOCzy6P5RUKENkVgc8/4ziAZURGY4 A+kLlFWsFJ7x85SSK/g6NPekT8Iob8v1493Gelj0mtJ6BtGSLYSNaXZM3yw5/yOtMY Fjn7Ji5NOpmAw== Date: Thu, 7 Nov 2024 07:13:25 -0600 From: Bjorn Helgaas To: Manivannan Sadhasivam Cc: Stephen Rothwell , Bjorn Helgaas , Lorenzo Pieralisi , Krzysztof =?utf-8?Q?Wilczy=C5=84ski?= , Krzysztof =?utf-8?Q?Wilczy=C5=84ski?= , Manivannan Sadhasivam , Linux Kernel Mailing List , Linux Next Mailing List Subject: Re: linux-next: build failure after merge of the pci tree Message-ID: <20241107131325.GA1603844@bhelgaas> Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: linux-next@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20241107120716.rkymr4sedc5co2nx@thinkpad> On Thu, Nov 07, 2024 at 12:07:16PM +0000, Manivannan Sadhasivam wrote: > On Thu, Nov 07, 2024 at 11:02:31PM +1100, Stephen Rothwell wrote: > > Hi all, > > > > After merging the pci tree, today's linux-next build (i386 defconfig) > > failed like this: > > > > In file included from drivers/pci/msi/pcidev_msi.c:5: > > drivers/pci/msi/../pci.h:862:1: error: expected identifier or '(' before '{' token > > 862 | { > > | ^ > > drivers/pci/msi/../pci.h:861:20: error: 'of_pci_is_supply_present' declared 'static' but never defined [-Werror=unused-function] > > 861 | static inline bool of_pci_is_supply_present(struct device_node *np); > > | ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ > > That's silly on me. Krzysztof, could you please fix it in the branch? I fixed it, thanks for the report.