From: Gary Guo <gary@garyguo.net>
To: Miguel Ojeda <miguel.ojeda.sandonis@gmail.com>
Cc: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@canb.auug.org.au>,
Miguel Ojeda <ojeda@kernel.org>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
Linux Next Mailing List <linux-next@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: linux-next: build failure after merge of the rust tree
Date: Mon, 11 Nov 2024 14:15:16 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20241111141516.1d924b1d@eugeo> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CANiq72nyWAhyORsDij6P6U7Ww=eCp6S=LzPWZN4wxGD8JiK+RQ@mail.gmail.com>
On Mon, 11 Nov 2024 09:28:53 +0100
Miguel Ojeda <miguel.ojeda.sandonis@gmail.com> wrote:
> On Mon, Nov 11, 2024 at 9:16 AM Miguel Ojeda
> <miguel.ojeda.sandonis@gmail.com> wrote:
> >
> > moment only the patches up to introducing the new `ffi::` crate (which
> > includes most of the changes), i.e. up to commit d072acda4862 ("rust:
> > use custom FFI integer types") but without doing the big remapping
> > just yet, so that others have it available for their branches, and
>
> "without doing the big remapping" is ambiguous -- I meant "actual
> remapping", i.e. taking the commit as-is without the next commit,
> since we should be able to do most of the renames already.
That sounds reasonable to me. So for next cycles we have a commit that
fixes up remaining renames, and then apply the other commits?
Best,
Gary
>
> But the other interpretation, i.e. skipping most of the
> changes/renames `core` -> `ffi` in that commit and do those later when
> we do the actual remapping (which is most of the changes, in fact), is
> also fine. They are not needed right away.
>
> I will check how it would look like on top of next.
>
> Cheers,
> Miguel
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2024-11-11 14:15 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 63+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2024-11-11 6:58 linux-next: build failure after merge of the rust tree Stephen Rothwell
2024-11-11 8:16 ` Miguel Ojeda
2024-11-11 8:28 ` Miguel Ojeda
2024-11-11 14:15 ` Gary Guo [this message]
2024-11-11 23:08 ` Miguel Ojeda
2024-11-11 23:58 ` Miguel Ojeda
2024-11-12 1:29 ` Stephen Rothwell
2024-11-12 6:30 ` Stephen Rothwell
2024-11-12 8:50 ` Miguel Ojeda
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2025-11-17 8:04 Stephen Rothwell
2025-11-17 11:19 ` Alexandre Courbot
2025-11-17 14:51 ` Alice Ryhl
2025-11-17 15:37 ` Tamir Duberstein
2025-11-17 16:11 ` Alice Ryhl
2025-06-24 7:31 Stephen Rothwell
2025-06-24 10:31 ` Miguel Ojeda
2025-06-24 11:12 ` Danilo Krummrich
2025-06-24 12:29 ` Miguel Ojeda
2025-06-24 12:00 ` Danilo Krummrich
2025-06-24 12:14 ` Alexandre Courbot
2025-06-24 12:16 ` Tamir Duberstein
2025-06-24 12:24 ` Alexandre Courbot
2025-06-24 12:29 ` Tamir Duberstein
2025-06-24 12:25 ` Miguel Ojeda
2025-05-27 9:42 Stephen Rothwell
2025-05-27 10:03 ` Miguel Ojeda
2025-05-12 9:40 Stephen Rothwell
2025-05-12 11:52 ` Miguel Ojeda
2025-03-24 10:57 Stephen Rothwell
2025-03-24 11:06 ` Stephen Rothwell
2025-03-24 11:59 ` Danilo Krummrich
2025-03-24 13:29 ` Greg KH
2025-03-24 13:43 ` Danilo Krummrich
2025-03-24 13:52 ` Greg KH
2025-03-24 15:18 ` Miguel Ojeda
2025-03-24 15:27 ` Danilo Krummrich
2025-03-24 15:40 ` Miguel Ojeda
2025-03-17 10:57 Stephen Rothwell
2025-03-17 22:35 ` Miguel Ojeda
2025-03-17 23:35 ` Stephen Rothwell
2025-03-18 11:37 ` Stephen Rothwell
2025-03-18 23:47 ` Miguel Ojeda
2025-03-19 9:06 ` Stephen Rothwell
2025-03-19 9:18 ` Miguel Ojeda
2025-01-10 5:28 Stephen Rothwell
2025-01-10 9:28 ` Alice Ryhl
2025-01-10 9:34 ` Greg Kroah-Hartman
2025-01-10 9:41 ` Alice Ryhl
2025-01-10 10:07 ` Alice Ryhl
2025-01-10 10:08 ` Miguel Ojeda
2025-01-10 10:16 ` Miguel Ojeda
2025-01-10 10:38 ` Miguel Ojeda
2024-12-16 5:25 Stephen Rothwell
2024-12-16 10:31 ` Miguel Ojeda
2024-12-16 10:59 ` Jocelyn Falempe
2024-12-16 16:24 ` Miguel Ojeda
2024-12-16 19:46 ` Jocelyn Falempe
2021-09-28 4:09 Stephen Rothwell
2021-09-28 4:18 ` Gary Guo
2021-09-28 5:52 ` Stephen Rothwell
2021-09-28 23:37 ` Stephen Rothwell
2021-09-29 17:13 ` Masahiro Yamada
2021-09-29 17:25 ` Miguel Ojeda
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20241111141516.1d924b1d@eugeo \
--to=gary@garyguo.net \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-next@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=miguel.ojeda.sandonis@gmail.com \
--cc=ojeda@kernel.org \
--cc=sfr@canb.auug.org.au \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox