public inbox for linux-next@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Gary Guo <gary@garyguo.net>
To: Miguel Ojeda <miguel.ojeda.sandonis@gmail.com>
Cc: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@canb.auug.org.au>,
	Miguel Ojeda <ojeda@kernel.org>,
	Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	Linux Next Mailing List <linux-next@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: linux-next: build failure after merge of the rust tree
Date: Mon, 11 Nov 2024 14:15:16 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20241111141516.1d924b1d@eugeo> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CANiq72nyWAhyORsDij6P6U7Ww=eCp6S=LzPWZN4wxGD8JiK+RQ@mail.gmail.com>

On Mon, 11 Nov 2024 09:28:53 +0100
Miguel Ojeda <miguel.ojeda.sandonis@gmail.com> wrote:

> On Mon, Nov 11, 2024 at 9:16 AM Miguel Ojeda
> <miguel.ojeda.sandonis@gmail.com> wrote:
> >
> > moment only the patches up to introducing the new `ffi::` crate (which
> > includes most of the changes), i.e. up to commit d072acda4862 ("rust:
> > use custom FFI integer types") but without doing the big remapping
> > just yet, so that others have it available for their branches, and  
> 
> "without doing the big remapping" is ambiguous -- I meant "actual
> remapping", i.e. taking the commit as-is without the next commit,
> since we should be able to do most of the renames already.

That sounds reasonable to me. So for next cycles we have a commit that
fixes up remaining renames, and then apply the other commits?

Best,
Gary

> 
> But the other interpretation, i.e. skipping most of the
> changes/renames `core` -> `ffi` in that commit and do those later when
> we do the actual remapping (which is most of the changes, in fact), is
> also fine. They are not needed right away.
> 
> I will check how it would look like on top of next.
> 
> Cheers,
> Miguel


  reply	other threads:[~2024-11-11 14:15 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 63+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2024-11-11  6:58 linux-next: build failure after merge of the rust tree Stephen Rothwell
2024-11-11  8:16 ` Miguel Ojeda
2024-11-11  8:28   ` Miguel Ojeda
2024-11-11 14:15     ` Gary Guo [this message]
2024-11-11 23:08       ` Miguel Ojeda
2024-11-11 23:58     ` Miguel Ojeda
2024-11-12  1:29       ` Stephen Rothwell
2024-11-12  6:30       ` Stephen Rothwell
2024-11-12  8:50         ` Miguel Ojeda
  -- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2025-11-17  8:04 Stephen Rothwell
2025-11-17 11:19 ` Alexandre Courbot
2025-11-17 14:51 ` Alice Ryhl
2025-11-17 15:37   ` Tamir Duberstein
2025-11-17 16:11     ` Alice Ryhl
2025-06-24  7:31 Stephen Rothwell
2025-06-24 10:31 ` Miguel Ojeda
2025-06-24 11:12   ` Danilo Krummrich
2025-06-24 12:29     ` Miguel Ojeda
2025-06-24 12:00   ` Danilo Krummrich
2025-06-24 12:14     ` Alexandre Courbot
2025-06-24 12:16       ` Tamir Duberstein
2025-06-24 12:24         ` Alexandre Courbot
2025-06-24 12:29           ` Tamir Duberstein
2025-06-24 12:25     ` Miguel Ojeda
2025-05-27  9:42 Stephen Rothwell
2025-05-27 10:03 ` Miguel Ojeda
2025-05-12  9:40 Stephen Rothwell
2025-05-12 11:52 ` Miguel Ojeda
2025-03-24 10:57 Stephen Rothwell
2025-03-24 11:06 ` Stephen Rothwell
2025-03-24 11:59   ` Danilo Krummrich
2025-03-24 13:29     ` Greg KH
2025-03-24 13:43       ` Danilo Krummrich
2025-03-24 13:52         ` Greg KH
2025-03-24 15:18         ` Miguel Ojeda
2025-03-24 15:27           ` Danilo Krummrich
2025-03-24 15:40             ` Miguel Ojeda
2025-03-17 10:57 Stephen Rothwell
2025-03-17 22:35 ` Miguel Ojeda
2025-03-17 23:35   ` Stephen Rothwell
2025-03-18 11:37     ` Stephen Rothwell
2025-03-18 23:47       ` Miguel Ojeda
2025-03-19  9:06         ` Stephen Rothwell
2025-03-19  9:18           ` Miguel Ojeda
2025-01-10  5:28 Stephen Rothwell
2025-01-10  9:28 ` Alice Ryhl
2025-01-10  9:34   ` Greg Kroah-Hartman
2025-01-10  9:41     ` Alice Ryhl
2025-01-10 10:07       ` Alice Ryhl
2025-01-10 10:08       ` Miguel Ojeda
2025-01-10 10:16     ` Miguel Ojeda
2025-01-10 10:38       ` Miguel Ojeda
2024-12-16  5:25 Stephen Rothwell
2024-12-16 10:31 ` Miguel Ojeda
2024-12-16 10:59   ` Jocelyn Falempe
2024-12-16 16:24     ` Miguel Ojeda
2024-12-16 19:46       ` Jocelyn Falempe
2021-09-28  4:09 Stephen Rothwell
2021-09-28  4:18 ` Gary Guo
2021-09-28  5:52   ` Stephen Rothwell
2021-09-28 23:37     ` Stephen Rothwell
2021-09-29 17:13       ` Masahiro Yamada
2021-09-29 17:25         ` Miguel Ojeda

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20241111141516.1d924b1d@eugeo \
    --to=gary@garyguo.net \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-next@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=miguel.ojeda.sandonis@gmail.com \
    --cc=ojeda@kernel.org \
    --cc=sfr@canb.auug.org.au \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox