From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@canb.auug.org.au>
To: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Cc: "Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@kernel.org>,
Frederic Weisbecker <frederic@kernel.org>,
Neeraj Upadhyay <neeraj.upadhyay@kernel.org>,
Boqun Feng <boqun.feng@gmail.com>,
Uladzislau Rezki <urezki@gmail.com>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
Linux Next Mailing List <linux-next@vger.kernel.org>,
"Peter Zijlstra (Intel)" <peterz@infradead.org>,
Sebastian Andrzej Siewior <bigeasy@linutronix.de>
Subject: Re: linux-next: manual merge of the rcu tree with the mm tree
Date: Wed, 22 Jan 2025 14:13:11 +1100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20250122141311.7537d25c@canb.auug.org.au> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20241220133738.1beae531@canb.auug.org.au>
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1602 bytes --]
Hi all,
On Fri, 20 Dec 2024 13:37:38 +1100 Stephen Rothwell <sfr@canb.auug.org.au> wrote:
>
> Today's linux-next merge of the rcu tree got a conflict in:
>
> kernel/rcu/tree.c
>
> between commit:
>
> bf8f464ee259 ("kasan: make kasan_record_aux_stack_noalloc() the default behaviour")
>
> from the mm tree and commit:
>
> 049dfe96baf9 ("rcu: Report callbacks enqueued on offline CPU blind spot")
>
> from the rcu tree.
>
> I fixed it up (see below) and can carry the fix as necessary. This
> is now fixed as far as linux-next is concerned, but any non trivial
> conflicts should be mentioned to your upstream maintainer when your tree
> is submitted for merging. You may also want to consider cooperating
> with the maintainer of the conflicting tree to minimise any particularly
> complex conflicts.
>
> --
> Cheers,
> Stephen Rothwell
>
> diff --cc kernel/rcu/tree.c
> index 3885aae5f9cb,24f1cb292a92..000000000000
> --- a/kernel/rcu/tree.c
> +++ b/kernel/rcu/tree.c
> @@@ -3083,9 -3083,12 +3083,12 @@@ __call_rcu_common(struct rcu_head *head
> }
> head->func = func;
> head->next = NULL;
> - kasan_record_aux_stack_noalloc(head);
> + kasan_record_aux_stack(head);
> +
> local_irq_save(flags);
> rdp = this_cpu_ptr(&rcu_data);
> + RCU_LOCKDEP_WARN(!rcu_rdp_cpu_online(rdp), "Callback enqueued on offline CPU!");
> +
> lazy = lazy_in && !rcu_async_should_hurry();
>
> /* Add the callback to our list. */
This is now a conflict between the mm-stable tree and Linus' tree.
--
Cheers,
Stephen Rothwell
[-- Attachment #2: OpenPGP digital signature --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 488 bytes --]
prev parent reply other threads:[~2025-01-22 3:13 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2024-12-20 2:37 linux-next: manual merge of the rcu tree with the mm tree Stephen Rothwell
2024-12-21 15:55 ` Uladzislau Rezki
2025-01-22 3:13 ` Stephen Rothwell [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20250122141311.7537d25c@canb.auug.org.au \
--to=sfr@canb.auug.org.au \
--cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=bigeasy@linutronix.de \
--cc=boqun.feng@gmail.com \
--cc=frederic@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-next@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=neeraj.upadhyay@kernel.org \
--cc=paulmck@kernel.org \
--cc=peterz@infradead.org \
--cc=urezki@gmail.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox