linux-next: Fixes tags need some work in the fuse tree

linux-next: Fixes tags need some work in the fuse tree

[Stephen Rothwell]

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1329 bytes --]

Hi all,

In commit

  d76c8bb7e031 ("fuse: Fix the struct fuse_args->in_args array size")

Fixes tag

  Fixes: fuse: make args->in_args[0] to be always the header

has these problem(s):

  - No SHA1 recognised

Maybe you meant:

Fixes: e24b7a3b70ae ("fuse: make args->in_args[0] to be always the header")

In commit

  a5564ff833b7 ("fuse: Remove unneeded include in fuse_dev_i.h")

Fixes tag

  Fixes: fuse: {io-uring} Make hash-list req unique finding functions non-static

has these problem(s):

  - No SHA1 recognised

Maybe you meant:

Fixes: 543282def3fc ("fuse: {io-uring} Make hash-list req unique finding functions non-static")

In commit

  f571aa60acaa ("fuse: Remove an err= assignment and move a comment")

Fixes tag

  Fixes: fuse: {io-uring} Handle SQEs - register commands

has these problem(s):

  - No SHA1 recognised

Maybe you meant:

Fixes: d7c8f3c02e21 ("fuse: {io-uring} Handle SQEs - register commands")

In commit

  3a0d08c113a3 ("fuse: Fix copy_from_user error return code in fuse_uring_commit")

Fixes tag

  Fixes: fuse: Add io-uring sqe commit and fetch support

has these problem(s):

  - No SHA1 recognised

Maybe you meant:

Fixes: d5223c566a20 ("fuse: Add io-uring sqe commit and fetch support")

-- 
Cheers,
Stephen Rothwell

[-- Attachment #2: OpenPGP digital signature --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 488 bytes --]

Re: linux-next: Fixes tags need some work in the fuse tree

[Bernd Schubert]

Hi Stephen,

On 1/23/25 21:13, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
> Hi all,
> 
> In commit
> 
>   d76c8bb7e031 ("fuse: Fix the struct fuse_args->in_args array size")
> 
> Fixes tag
> 
>   Fixes: fuse: make args->in_args[0] to be always the header

yes sorry, as I wrote in the introduction mail, as
linux-next gets rebases (I think) - didn't know what to put in. 
And Miklos might wrap these into the existing patches.

Will do with SHAs from 'current' linux-next next time and also
send a v2 in the morning.


Thanks,
Bernd