public inbox for linux-next@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Eric Biggers <ebiggers@kernel.org>
To: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@infradead.org>
Cc: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@canb.auug.org.au>,
	Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	Linux Next Mailing List <linux-next@vger.kernel.org>,
	x86@kernel.org
Subject: Re: linux-next: build warnings after merge of the crc tree
Date: Mon, 17 Feb 2025 10:16:11 -0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20250217181611.GA1258@sol.localdomain> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20250217170555.3d14df62@canb.auug.org.au>

On Mon, Feb 17, 2025 at 05:05:55PM +1100, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
> Hi all,
> 
> After merging the crc tree, today's linux-next build (x86_84 allmodconfig)
> produced these warnings:
> 
> vmlinux.o: warning: objtool: crc32_x86_init+0x1c0: relocation to !ENDBR: crc32_lsb_vpclmul_avx10_256+0x0
> vmlinux.o: warning: objtool: crc64_x86_init+0x183: relocation to !ENDBR: crc64_msb_vpclmul_avx10_256+0x0
> vmlinux.o: warning: objtool: crc_t10dif_x86_init+0x183: relocation to !ENDBR: crc16_msb_vpclmul_avx10_256+0x0
> vmlinux.o: warning: objtool: __SCK__crc32_lsb_pclmul+0x0: data relocation to !ENDBR: crc32_lsb_pclmul_sse+0x0
> vmlinux.o: warning: objtool: __SCK__crc64_lsb_pclmul+0x0: data relocation to !ENDBR: crc64_lsb_pclmul_sse+0x0
> vmlinux.o: warning: objtool: __SCK__crc64_msb_pclmul+0x0: data relocation to !ENDBR: crc64_msb_pclmul_sse+0x0
> vmlinux.o: warning: objtool: __SCK__crc16_msb_pclmul+0x0: data relocation to !ENDBR: crc16_msb_pclmul_sse+0x0
> 
> I have no idea what has caused these.  Just sending to the crc tree
> owner (due to the symbol names) and Peter (since he made the only new
> change to objtool - though it doesn't look vrey related).
> 
> -- 
> Cheers,
> Stephen Rothwell

Thanks.  I'm wondering if this means the crc assembly functions need to use
SYM_TYPED_FUNC_START instead of SYM_FUNC_START.  But they are only called via
static_calls, not indirect calls, so previously this didn't seem to be necessary
even with CFI enabled.  I'll look into it.  Peter, any thoughts on this?

- Eric


  reply	other threads:[~2025-02-17 18:16 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2025-02-17  6:05 linux-next: build warnings after merge of the crc tree Stephen Rothwell
2025-02-17 18:16 ` Eric Biggers [this message]
2025-02-17 18:51   ` Peter Zijlstra

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20250217181611.GA1258@sol.localdomain \
    --to=ebiggers@kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-next@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=peterz@infradead.org \
    --cc=sfr@canb.auug.org.au \
    --cc=x86@kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox