From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from desiato.infradead.org (desiato.infradead.org [90.155.92.199]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 7158121A436; Mon, 17 Mar 2025 10:57:06 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=90.155.92.199 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1742209028; cv=none; b=SQ5J1nJwjXe/GXOBWNvmUjwH4IwsuLBIRSbqmbzY4bcq5NK/RWrLPUxN17A+Sa6NGcEDLwGX4c1v2egbwbXWZmY2WceR29XjEQAjAJnvJd1ngdJNsrMzOQONQu+MsZM5JCcJypW5Jmb4lE1ZIsyMrKZaj/Brjnd65u3ia/wFn68= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1742209028; c=relaxed/simple; bh=5g+1++KluGaTovLm2uuILeKfVAJlHZL1qjltDHLhcZw=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:Message-ID:References:MIME-Version: Content-Type:Content-Disposition:In-Reply-To; b=cHxFPs+TAk9bH23h+lUs1gzB1Tfp7LLsZAIpj6PiPkILbQFbtmOhRk8pyQxLaLWiQVvWQC6L79BPhF0aSKCOklNzbIi40LH+l/58A5SpRtStTusKbUfKWA3sdxGwSpxtJbcsZ8+S+BndPaUSweqgUdvM507wnONXiMprs+g84gQ= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=none (p=none dis=none) header.from=infradead.org; spf=none smtp.mailfrom=infradead.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=infradead.org header.i=@infradead.org header.b=YJ3VZLY9; arc=none smtp.client-ip=90.155.92.199 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=none (p=none dis=none) header.from=infradead.org Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; spf=none smtp.mailfrom=infradead.org Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=infradead.org header.i=@infradead.org header.b="YJ3VZLY9" DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=infradead.org; s=desiato.20200630; h=In-Reply-To:Content-Type:MIME-Version: References:Message-ID:Subject:Cc:To:From:Date:Sender:Reply-To: Content-Transfer-Encoding:Content-ID:Content-Description; bh=IJ+u4xPyPr9EInZP5Wm5al8gZifxMNVa5ZDxXud7jHs=; b=YJ3VZLY9625tMN1tlRbs+Az85j kGJzVmw7U+TZgT1ijLt94X9Zl8QcdFa8l5g1BWp668KuJCq8XVluye9RTLdkxr6pDKuhfVtV1XxV2 TMRd7N2UTDbxn6i1MvAv1OvwvSmPNhNrSNK3ITE4pJddXNneNL4EZpNWZW/V4YtFSJJUUpliqEHz8 wtzpQRzPvtFNjgJPAB4gbxCxKnBpF1+vLSVm5CG7pmoGnbYQ0u5y3zKtPDVokEcmUJm7vFAgRzjkH Xg2QHE8WmUvD+y3+rFqzXmSK8lbJGq+CKSwLSqV1yhjHCQk8N1pl+mu4IT5lAQNrpneP4dGCwsDMY OAFIeprQ==; Received: from 77-249-17-252.cable.dynamic.v4.ziggo.nl ([77.249.17.252] helo=noisy.programming.kicks-ass.net) by desiato.infradead.org with esmtpsa (Exim 4.98 #2 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1tu89W-00000003QZN-3Wlf; Mon, 17 Mar 2025 10:57:03 +0000 Received: by noisy.programming.kicks-ass.net (Postfix, from userid 1000) id 44435300783; Mon, 17 Mar 2025 11:57:02 +0100 (CET) Date: Mon, 17 Mar 2025 11:57:02 +0100 From: Peter Zijlstra To: Stephen Rothwell Cc: Andrew Morton , jirislaby@kernel.org, ubizjak@gmail.com, Thomas Gleixner , Ingo Molnar , "H. Peter Anvin" , Linux Kernel Mailing List , Linux Next Mailing List Subject: Re: linux-next: build failure after merge of the tip tree Message-ID: <20250317105702.GD34541@noisy.programming.kicks-ass.net> References: <20250304162402.475eb3bc@canb.auug.org.au> <20250317093856.GA34541@noisy.programming.kicks-ass.net> <20250317215207.2d4fe178@canb.auug.org.au> Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: linux-next@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha512; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="v7jmWhOgLUrg1dXd" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20250317215207.2d4fe178@canb.auug.org.au> --v7jmWhOgLUrg1dXd Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Mon, Mar 17, 2025 at 09:52:07PM +1100, Stephen Rothwell wrote: > Hi Peter, >=20 > On Mon, 17 Mar 2025 10:38:56 +0100 Peter Zijlstra = wrote: > > > > Right. Sorry for not noticing before, and thanks Jiri for poking me. > >=20 > > So the below resolution make it go for me. The problem appears to be > > that due to: > >=20 > > bcecd5a529c1 ("percpu: repurpose __percpu tag as a named address spac= e qualifier") > >=20 > > this makes that this_cpu_ptr() wants a '__percpu *', instead we feed it > > '__percpu**' which confuses things. > >=20 > > What would be the best way around to getting this resolved, should I > > stick the below in a fixup patch in tip/perf/core, or do we carry this > > in a merge resolution somewhere? >=20 > Its a conflict between the mm tree and the tip tree, so I will carry it > as a resolution in -next and you all should let Linus know when the > pull requests get sent. >=20 > I will use your resolution from tomorrow. I pushed it out as a fix in tip/perf/core, figured it wouldn't hurt and it wont get lost. --v7jmWhOgLUrg1dXd Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- iQIzBAABCgAdFiEEv3OU3/byMaA0LqWJdkfhpEvA5LoFAmfX//MACgkQdkfhpEvA 5LrTGQ/+JGdSq2Fx4gMsb8dS+h7p58SWQ7NzI3bxKpjiU+USKfx/VgfG5p0hdw7E weZewC9ItxCT8JFD6ftTYqmWZW9p5egNTIv5XrY8nYxp9Thk+c67k1Pydwz2Lood 07NHqrqP2QVLyKvIb6x1SCDOEUZYt3zKi2T7zu0OcjM32grbf8F60yCvfodhgYXN LyMHLjWI64Y/cZ0TsmMxE3BVVDPEMYkBGFeT+sJ5zVG6WTXXMlOZ61+W3aN4/tPS Vi4YT/8CZfgh1eTJvZPEcXADlsQ4OCEMpM6em1a90Gg5rW+g7IiPEL44GGqzEHVZ Y6oekLQJvyKJ881pnyxcHXxm46om5GP1CnvcTJDWj8R882pkjN7pYltNDcRMZ9GJ ebHw5PxCtVBTXyrMbpvNgYHQ12I67nkXgZIRxudR++HSe9OFRq5PNeG0XUC/GoBc rceM6Jac0rLyf9p2KV/7EDVZa/Hl5qEO1k6ZInjfG2grGvVB7NlsiDKN2rqV8x4Z seLeutGdGaI3WlxVPKbeA93H3R+bM6MGsOkYMZL2foNXlALWBST7vmmvh5qv9njo Dy/dJiTCTKV/6NLs3RVzYdmzzcDTX3LqWDOBAfVrxdTTw3HjU7PObq9eyolO6MTW Yf7HngwgPwmL984qmTcc1JsujPygTisgdYeUnCC/VG4/IZDag1k= =+3rx -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --v7jmWhOgLUrg1dXd--