public inbox for linux-next@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@canb.auug.org.au>
To: Mauro Carvalho Chehab <mchehab@kernel.org>,
	Wolfram Sang <wsa@the-dreams.de>
Cc: Hans Verkuil <hverkuil@xs4all.nl>,
	Jai Luthra <jai.luthra@ideasonboard.com>,
	Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	Linux Next Mailing List <linux-next@vger.kernel.org>,
	Romain Gantois <romain.gantois@bootlin.com>,
	Sakari Ailus <sakari.ailus@linux.intel.com>,
	Tomi Valkeinen <tomi.valkeinen@ideasonboard.com>,
	Wolfram Sang <wsa+renesas@sang-engineering.com>
Subject: linux-next: manual merge of the v4l-dvb tree with the i2c tree
Date: Mon, 28 Apr 2025 10:49:05 +1000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20250428104905.2b54643f@canb.auug.org.au> (raw)

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 4261 bytes --]

Hi all,

Today's linux-next merge of the v4l-dvb tree got a conflict in:

  drivers/media/i2c/ds90ub960.c

between commits:

  3ec29d51b546 ("media: i2c: ds90ub960: Protect alias_use_mask with a mutex")
  818bd489f137 ("i2c: use client addresses directly in ATR interface")

from the i2c tree and commits:

  24868501a744 ("media: i2c: ds90ub9xx: Add err parameter to read/write funcs")
  2ca499384e98 ("media: i2c: ds90ub960: Add RX port iteration support")

from the v4l-dvb tree.

I fixed it up (see below) and can carry the fix as necessary. This
is now fixed as far as linux-next is concerned, but any non trivial
conflicts should be mentioned to your upstream maintainer when your tree
is submitted for merging.  You may also want to consider cooperating
with the maintainer of the conflicting tree to minimise any particularly
complex conflicts.

-- 
Cheers,
Stephen Rothwell

diff --cc drivers/media/i2c/ds90ub960.c
index 5a4d5de110bd,1877eb735cc7..000000000000
--- a/drivers/media/i2c/ds90ub960.c
+++ b/drivers/media/i2c/ds90ub960.c
@@@ -1056,11 -1271,10 +1274,12 @@@ static int ub960_atr_attach_addr(struc
  	struct ub960_rxport *rxport = priv->rxports[chan_id];
  	struct device *dev = &priv->client->dev;
  	unsigned int reg_idx;
+ 	int ret = 0;
  
 -	for (reg_idx = 0; reg_idx < ARRAY_SIZE(rxport->aliased_clients); reg_idx++) {
 -		if (!rxport->aliased_clients[reg_idx])
 +	guard(mutex)(&rxport->aliased_addrs_lock);
 +
 +	for (reg_idx = 0; reg_idx < ARRAY_SIZE(rxport->aliased_addrs); reg_idx++) {
 +		if (!rxport->aliased_addrs[reg_idx])
  			break;
  	}
  
@@@ -1069,15 -1283,18 +1288,18 @@@
  		return -EADDRNOTAVAIL;
  	}
  
 -	rxport->aliased_clients[reg_idx] = client;
 +	rxport->aliased_addrs[reg_idx] = addr;
  
  	ub960_rxport_write(priv, chan_id, UB960_RR_SLAVE_ID(reg_idx),
- 			   addr << 1);
 -			   client->addr << 1, &ret);
++			   addr << 1, &ret);
  	ub960_rxport_write(priv, chan_id, UB960_RR_SLAVE_ALIAS(reg_idx),
- 			   alias << 1);
+ 			   alias << 1, &ret);
+ 
+ 	if (ret)
+ 		return ret;
  
  	dev_dbg(dev, "rx%u: client 0x%02x assigned alias 0x%02x at slot %u\n",
 -		rxport->nport, client->addr, alias, reg_idx);
 +		rxport->nport, addr, alias, reg_idx);
  
  	return 0;
  }
@@@ -1089,11 -1306,10 +1311,12 @@@ static void ub960_atr_detach_addr(struc
  	struct ub960_rxport *rxport = priv->rxports[chan_id];
  	struct device *dev = &priv->client->dev;
  	unsigned int reg_idx;
+ 	int ret;
  
 -	for (reg_idx = 0; reg_idx < ARRAY_SIZE(rxport->aliased_clients); reg_idx++) {
 -		if (rxport->aliased_clients[reg_idx] == client)
 +	guard(mutex)(&rxport->aliased_addrs_lock);
 +
 +	for (reg_idx = 0; reg_idx < ARRAY_SIZE(rxport->aliased_addrs); reg_idx++) {
 +		if (rxport->aliased_addrs[reg_idx] == addr)
  			break;
  	}
  
@@@ -1103,12 -1319,18 +1326,18 @@@
  		return;
  	}
  
 -	rxport->aliased_clients[reg_idx] = NULL;
 +	rxport->aliased_addrs[reg_idx] = 0;
  
- 	ub960_rxport_write(priv, chan_id, UB960_RR_SLAVE_ALIAS(reg_idx), 0);
+ 	ret = ub960_rxport_write(priv, chan_id, UB960_RR_SLAVE_ALIAS(reg_idx),
+ 				 0, NULL);
+ 	if (ret) {
+ 		dev_err(dev, "rx%u: unable to fully unmap client 0x%02x: %d\n",
+ 			rxport->nport, client->addr, ret);
+ 		return;
+ 	}
  
  	dev_dbg(dev, "rx%u: client 0x%02x released at slot %u\n", rxport->nport,
 -		client->addr, reg_idx);
 +		addr, reg_idx);
  }
  
  static const struct i2c_atr_ops ub960_atr_ops = {
@@@ -3231,21 -4370,12 +4376,14 @@@ static void ub960_txport_free_ports(str
  
  static void ub960_rxport_free_ports(struct ub960_data *priv)
  {
- 	unsigned int nport;
- 
- 	for (nport = 0; nport < priv->hw_data->num_rxports; nport++) {
- 		struct ub960_rxport *rxport = priv->rxports[nport];
- 
- 		if (!rxport)
- 			continue;
- 
- 		fwnode_handle_put(rxport->source.ep_fwnode);
- 		fwnode_handle_put(rxport->ser.fwnode);
+ 	for_each_active_rxport(priv, it) {
+ 		fwnode_handle_put(it.rxport->source.ep_fwnode);
+ 		fwnode_handle_put(it.rxport->ser.fwnode);
  
 +		mutex_destroy(&rxport->aliased_addrs_lock);
 +
- 		kfree(rxport);
- 		priv->rxports[nport] = NULL;
+ 		kfree(it.rxport);
+ 		priv->rxports[it.nport] = NULL;
  	}
  }
  

[-- Attachment #2: OpenPGP digital signature --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 488 bytes --]

             reply	other threads:[~2025-04-28  0:49 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 12+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2025-04-28  0:49 Stephen Rothwell [this message]
2025-04-28  1:22 ` linux-next: manual merge of the v4l-dvb tree with the i2c tree Stephen Rothwell
2025-04-28  1:30   ` Stephen Rothwell
2025-04-29 11:46     ` Tomi Valkeinen
2025-05-29  2:49     ` Stephen Rothwell
2025-05-30  8:13       ` Romain Gantois
2025-05-30 11:24         ` Wolfram Sang
2025-06-02 16:17           ` Romain Gantois
2025-05-31 12:05         ` Wolfram Sang
2025-06-02 15:57           ` Romain Gantois
  -- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2013-04-03  1:12 Stephen Rothwell
2013-05-01  3:27 ` Stephen Rothwell

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20250428104905.2b54643f@canb.auug.org.au \
    --to=sfr@canb.auug.org.au \
    --cc=hverkuil@xs4all.nl \
    --cc=jai.luthra@ideasonboard.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-next@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mchehab@kernel.org \
    --cc=romain.gantois@bootlin.com \
    --cc=sakari.ailus@linux.intel.com \
    --cc=tomi.valkeinen@ideasonboard.com \
    --cc=wsa+renesas@sang-engineering.com \
    --cc=wsa@the-dreams.de \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox