* linux-next: duplicate patch in the pinctrl-samsung tree
@ 2025-04-30 7:50 Stephen Rothwell
2025-04-30 8:29 ` Krzysztof Kozlowski
0 siblings, 1 reply; 3+ messages in thread
From: Stephen Rothwell @ 2025-04-30 7:50 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Krzysztof Kozlowski, Sylwester Nawrocki, Linus Walleij
Cc: Linux Kernel Mailing List, Linux Next Mailing List
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 344 bytes --]
Hi all,
The following commit is also in the pinctrl tree as a different commit
(but the same patch):
0a5b9be31f78 ("pinctrl: samsung: use new GPIO line value setter callbacks")
This is commit
9e4c444755b1 ("pinctrl: samsung: use new GPIO line value setter callbacks")
in the pinctrl tree.
--
Cheers,
Stephen Rothwell
[-- Attachment #2: OpenPGP digital signature --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 488 bytes --]
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread* Re: linux-next: duplicate patch in the pinctrl-samsung tree
2025-04-30 7:50 linux-next: duplicate patch in the pinctrl-samsung tree Stephen Rothwell
@ 2025-04-30 8:29 ` Krzysztof Kozlowski
2025-04-30 8:47 ` Linus Walleij
0 siblings, 1 reply; 3+ messages in thread
From: Krzysztof Kozlowski @ 2025-04-30 8:29 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Stephen Rothwell, Sylwester Nawrocki, Linus Walleij
Cc: Linux Kernel Mailing List, Linux Next Mailing List
On 30/04/2025 09:50, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> The following commit is also in the pinctrl tree as a different commit
> (but the same patch):
>
> 0a5b9be31f78 ("pinctrl: samsung: use new GPIO line value setter callbacks")
>
> This is commit
>
> 9e4c444755b1 ("pinctrl: samsung: use new GPIO line value setter callbacks")
>
Thanks, I will drop mine.
Best regards,
Krzysztof
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread* Re: linux-next: duplicate patch in the pinctrl-samsung tree
2025-04-30 8:29 ` Krzysztof Kozlowski
@ 2025-04-30 8:47 ` Linus Walleij
0 siblings, 0 replies; 3+ messages in thread
From: Linus Walleij @ 2025-04-30 8:47 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Krzysztof Kozlowski
Cc: Stephen Rothwell, Sylwester Nawrocki, Linux Kernel Mailing List,
Linux Next Mailing List
On Wed, Apr 30, 2025 at 10:29 AM Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk@kernel.org> wrote:
> On 30/04/2025 09:50, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
> > Hi all,
> >
> > The following commit is also in the pinctrl tree as a different commit
> > (but the same patch):
> >
> > 0a5b9be31f78 ("pinctrl: samsung: use new GPIO line value setter callbacks")
> >
> > This is commit
> >
> > 9e4c444755b1 ("pinctrl: samsung: use new GPIO line value setter callbacks")
> >
>
> Thanks, I will drop mine.
Thanks Krzysztof, my bad I didn't think about splitting the series across
submaintainers, I should have. I hope this doesn't collide with anything
in your tree.
Yours,
Linus Walleij
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2025-04-30 8:53 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2025-04-30 7:50 linux-next: duplicate patch in the pinctrl-samsung tree Stephen Rothwell
2025-04-30 8:29 ` Krzysztof Kozlowski
2025-04-30 8:47 ` Linus Walleij
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox