From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from smtp.kernel.org (aws-us-west-2-korg-mail-1.web.codeaurora.org [10.30.226.201]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 545A71A0BF1; Wed, 7 May 2025 17:13:45 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=10.30.226.201 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1746638026; cv=none; b=Yf5h+qpkXdkT+58AqylGrlsJw0LTUroFv78oxPNXDEhp0ciGmQxOnsm7lSUIWV69sgz7qutg2+1eoczXWlNDjW3MkZzItsyWqqpSj9rHcC8ELF9tBGKfEEZTiw06yH/Cj0vCUo6dNL5NNB6qqGnoFpB6SwJb9vjcMhwsWfk2vsQ= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1746638026; c=relaxed/simple; bh=PmE5AMWayhcd+e54onh5bX8GqZApiSRs1f3o3moTGPc=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:Message-ID:References:MIME-Version: Content-Type:Content-Disposition:In-Reply-To; b=CCZdlpZ04FAoc8qRzP8tiCzu7dDap82qyORUEN4EBlkjL3BI+h24DsaVg/8MBoE/StpoNTSB3pwmYIa/qrg865PPzuSvRneGY6h+urUWUNvbrALKD5qVuPuJW5cftRWYrt4Is9ByP6sKoRalosE4OZ1YHnqVDMOCmSRlV+W+qKg= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=kernel.org header.i=@kernel.org header.b=kEujl9TV; arc=none smtp.client-ip=10.30.226.201 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=kernel.org header.i=@kernel.org header.b="kEujl9TV" Received: by smtp.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 75484C4CEE2; Wed, 7 May 2025 17:13:45 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=kernel.org; s=k20201202; t=1746638025; bh=PmE5AMWayhcd+e54onh5bX8GqZApiSRs1f3o3moTGPc=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:References:In-Reply-To:From; b=kEujl9TVEBQDx+MuY1AJNXxri6mnV2fYcT60715clOBJaWQfCh+DzuWmGVKzBXe37 RM89XVjYUo9Fx0AuyeKEekx/jVESLEHPY/Xf7oKAe5hCI+bBzhDU11R3Wwj9mkbmwI Ot/gf2J0geVXdc6UNy7jTN2NJihrLn/k130KUHiuLL6up9SbmjWpcr9FJk1/MvFLZM kvjOH/h2r1DCC2qrKkYndauzzceZR6dAXvOGup/9mc8PhP6b/HgKBKGY6HCVdB1jsT FWGJ6KMAbw8pgQT4yPXWaX1TNinw97P/bm8diyw+ZHu3F5y/m3jwD9U/oz59IM5o0P rTw1F1g0jfwTQ== Date: Wed, 7 May 2025 10:13:41 -0700 From: Eric Biggers To: Thorsten Leemhuis Cc: Herbert Xu , oe-kbuild-all@lists.linux.dev, Ard Biesheuvel , LKML , Linux Next Mailing List , Linux Crypto Mailing List , kernel test robot Subject: Re: [ebiggers:sha256-lib-v4 4/13] /tmp/ccoCWqTC.s: Error: local label `"3" (instance number 1 of a fb label)' is not defined Message-ID: <20250507171341.GA181648@sol> References: <202505071811.yYpLUbav-lkp@intel.com> Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: linux-next@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: On Wed, May 07, 2025 at 12:56:22PM +0200, Thorsten Leemhuis wrote: > [+linux-crypto and +Herbert Xu, who committed that change that showed up > in -next today; sorry for forgetting this earlier] > > On 07.05.25 12:50, Thorsten Leemhuis wrote: > > On 07.05.25 12:25, kernel test robot wrote: > >> tree: https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/ebiggers/linux.git sha256-lib-v4 > >> head: 849682242c36727c23430b6cfed12e4422313931 > >> commit: 9f2dd94847c914bb716be744e12cb02f175638db [4/13] crypto: arm64/sha256 - implement library instead of shash > >> config: arm64-randconfig-003-20250429 (https://download.01.org/0day-ci/archive/20250507/202505071811.yYpLUbav-lkp@intel.com/config) > >> compiler: aarch64-linux-gcc (GCC) 9.5.0 > >> reproduce (this is a W=1 build): (https://download.01.org/0day-ci/archive/20250507/202505071811.yYpLUbav-lkp@intel.com/reproduce) > >> > >> If you fix the issue in a separate patch/commit (i.e. not just a new version of > >> the same patch/commit), kindly add following tags > >> | Reported-by: kernel test robot > >> | Closes: https://lore.kernel.org/oe-kbuild-all/202505071811.yYpLUbav-lkp@intel.com/ > >> > >> All errors (new ones prefixed by >>): > >> > >> /tmp/ccoCWqTC.s: Assembler messages: > >>>> /tmp/ccoCWqTC.s: Error: local label `"3" (instance number 1 of a fb label)' is not defined > > > > I ran into the same problem today when building -next rpms for arm64 > > Fedora using the approach and configuration used to build the kernel > > rpms shipped in Fedora rawhide. > > > > Full build log: > > > > https://download.copr.fedorainfracloud.org/results/@kernel-vanilla/next/fedora-rawhide-aarch64/09006679-next-next-all/builder-live.log.gz > > > > Ciao, Thorsten Thanks. https://lore.kernel.org/r/20250507170901.151548-1-ebiggers@kernel.org fixes this. This was specific to CONFIG_PREEMPT_VOLUNTARY=y, which I've now added to the lists of configs I test... - Eric