From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from smtp.kernel.org (aws-us-west-2-korg-mail-1.web.codeaurora.org [10.30.226.201]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 87D1F1E503C; Wed, 14 May 2025 07:48:51 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=10.30.226.201 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1747208931; cv=none; b=C++XYaxEeJHV65JUc1e6CpeJR2jRoxL9RTLZaoLFZ2X88DlP929tS1YSTkZWz3Og7Yen9edSVi+/wKakkJtpUP3FXqHNAZ7mUXQJrJgHqtIMgutrUAy7+SiIGoOPLwSNj7+3e+sIvQd8LVCRuUJLaT7GojXFy/hrFNT2Xq80WVI= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1747208931; c=relaxed/simple; bh=kx/o7c++YZe5/Fu+F/D2gMG8MyY9k68n5y75A7ZQrew=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:Message-ID:References:MIME-Version: Content-Type:Content-Disposition:In-Reply-To; b=LOsFEtrcA3rq11wF22Vo9Ne+tn+Qn4s2+HpEYwgAxnIlhvgMJIewvcqCzO4huTeE8BkK7V0uVRvLAmqQW8TogAlAs8Or5wu048yPDEYHR8BwA2anq1b0QMUz3qEe6RzegTH2kzrkjUOzCasSTVsA6rpX7GoprgeVYCz+RJm5qsw= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=kernel.org header.i=@kernel.org header.b=McF38jzi; arc=none smtp.client-ip=10.30.226.201 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=kernel.org header.i=@kernel.org header.b="McF38jzi" Received: by smtp.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 01AAEC4CEE9; Wed, 14 May 2025 07:48:49 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=kernel.org; s=k20201202; t=1747208931; bh=kx/o7c++YZe5/Fu+F/D2gMG8MyY9k68n5y75A7ZQrew=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:References:In-Reply-To:From; b=McF38jziSXRG9GsJB4IIHne7GoCpjkr2MbXajZyGBbT9ujioLoM2Z/7VstGgJMHyr lSQXCu1vBifTF2orsdDvPhzYc9wrSZyl76398vR4Mh/u14QduRQpsj2QuO8pSJ6AF4 3XwF4JJ/qNWVMnqyL9c6Ceh4yx2VxcQObg/fH2/ZQzkjnROZXm/HEOvjT1TfGQ2yxr ym/P6rNygvggT1EUVtFWIZmdYgFu4VcZdkIzOWUJkpVeRJZosWLI7niwcpDxcldRvU Pjndg68XvpSBFqNvTO1x7R+/bLqJpE+9KlQWBn9oYQcKs3XvOU/v2A+8AWYFxxH4J5 l572FY3brjR7A== Date: Wed, 14 May 2025 08:48:47 +0100 From: Lee Jones To: Stephen Rothwell Cc: Bartosz Golaszewski , Linux Kernel Mailing List , Linux Next Mailing List Subject: Re: linux-next: duplicate patches in the gpio-brgl tree Message-ID: <20250514074847.GX2936510@google.com> References: <20250514173428.46a24083@canb.auug.org.au> Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: linux-next@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit In-Reply-To: <20250514173428.46a24083@canb.auug.org.au> On Wed, 14 May 2025, Stephen Rothwell wrote: > Hi all, > > The following commits are also in the mfd tree as different commits > (but the same patches): > > 81fec13be953 ("dt-bindings: mfd: Add max77759 binding") > ee71546b8120 ("dt-bindings: nvmem: Add max77759 binding") > 190b565788ed ("dt-bindings: gpio: Add max77759 binding") > > These are commits > > f63a2ff5372e ("dt-bindings: mfd: add max77759 binding") > 3f29432ca3d3 ("dt-bindings: nvmem: add max77759 binding") > 8ba821d3c314 ("dt-bindings: gpio: add max77759 binding") > > in the mfd tree. This is probably my fault. It should now be fixed. Let's check again tomorrow. -- Lee Jones [李琼斯]