From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from fhigh-a6-smtp.messagingengine.com (fhigh-a6-smtp.messagingengine.com [103.168.172.157]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id B11F32576; Fri, 23 May 2025 12:50:21 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=103.168.172.157 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1748004624; cv=none; b=bYz7Ck+qkO/jV5Il441CeWqmr9plagI+fFmOdQjXo/VfslPKvt7VNQAfy8bG7BxSVFANwodchsccLGO/mBqxS2Vdur4/cdSiu+doC+EWx5+NAtUJoDYVFFryNV1FUjFXyQhM58qwxIrLMOnsz1NqYL8u4hHpRBbKjmo2oC88vhE= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1748004624; c=relaxed/simple; bh=s68+E7ctAYoJcPBM1D4+htBme6u+WOWt5Olodz1asVU=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:Message-ID:References:MIME-Version: Content-Type:Content-Disposition:In-Reply-To; b=J+gP72jSaciuL4QDkHkoFvgju9AIFLhvg8y8m9yCdZUyKvcA4KpsGcIt/M3QCnA8e6bH5KPE7QwckHmgGfB98TVo029v7ZqqE8hbAv3bhvs97ggV3N9xeohVbZe5jVdN3qEb2/4bRil/fGvHAjMy8BBWKzBCDqFyH/CXhHZqb8E= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=kroah.com; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=kroah.com; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=kroah.com header.i=@kroah.com header.b=LPIRd/8Q; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=messagingengine.com header.i=@messagingengine.com header.b=cCsyRVd/; arc=none smtp.client-ip=103.168.172.157 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=kroah.com Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=kroah.com Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=kroah.com header.i=@kroah.com header.b="LPIRd/8Q"; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=messagingengine.com header.i=@messagingengine.com header.b="cCsyRVd/" Received: from phl-compute-10.internal (phl-compute-10.phl.internal [10.202.2.50]) by mailfhigh.phl.internal (Postfix) with ESMTP id 87E371140178; Fri, 23 May 2025 08:50:20 -0400 (EDT) Received: from phl-mailfrontend-01 ([10.202.2.162]) by phl-compute-10.internal (MEProxy); Fri, 23 May 2025 08:50:20 -0400 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=kroah.com; h=cc :cc:content-type:content-type:date:date:from:from:in-reply-to :in-reply-to:message-id:mime-version:references:reply-to:subject :subject:to:to; s=fm3; t=1748004620; x=1748091020; bh=PwwEtOtJCz k3vlOMeCM+Nvpswbr381LHbWSMQWgkYPA=; b=LPIRd/8Q1IPcVO5ZeGx6qmsVCn 6d6deZwnvkoyzEnZW6/HaT0GGbwxcqc66jUSecG3T8AMh2fdsa8fkJrOD61J+AAW P04UP1kQNyzK8GsURUvv/Nbab/UPDsHU9rSaFhZjOLl554nr6EzsG2F79PtA1Cgj 5GIQ5rVZimrDLuj+C+szmlkXguBTG1oFdW2FDX7QGaMlk9JAyqcTCScxkvJ63Nc9 W4PkUrw9qLa95YMum2DwHs7ilfK08wo0AZJHoMXwcRmdhgI5lUj0iSG5Y5okDsTO fOWEYac5SQFY4hN7CdTKncuIBoSq+HFB4BiySNKUXvbGJZSpiCAoqrEjuylw== DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d= messagingengine.com; h=cc:cc:content-type:content-type:date:date :feedback-id:feedback-id:from:from:in-reply-to:in-reply-to :message-id:mime-version:references:reply-to:subject:subject:to :to:x-me-proxy:x-me-sender:x-me-sender:x-sasl-enc; s=fm3; t= 1748004620; x=1748091020; bh=PwwEtOtJCzk3vlOMeCM+Nvpswbr381LHbWS MQWgkYPA=; b=cCsyRVd/nk9pwzNZfqqn0OD9Cj3eUUNwd9yqtKwgW1EsCuwrZLJ 2Tu6blSKJL/r4iWAuV+yHERB65YfA8wFpiuvdu8++QX0w4D4abNVTxrB9uMmLPOF cnuJDETRpMhzvXsKe+gOAoLJVB4bhD56IfT7V0A9aWdjqHy3agQrHiE67xdhR6Z/ IDaAbP4SFRChaPSgC3HJe70Z3JzB2ZVs/9oqYxClSNN4soqn5xMNzawo3VJjqKm1 dHubj3AxWvaxO2/bhtpBBZmLd7G4YCgU4juKkujHAauuI72Ed4utuZsAsi2NdoHK PNuUm/n++DdyPkTOYGQGIkm6drriycuEwaA== X-ME-Sender: X-ME-Received: X-ME-Proxy-Cause: gggruggvucftvghtrhhoucdtuddrgeeffedrtddtgdekkeelucdltddurdegfedvrddttd dmucetufdoteggodetrfdotffvucfrrhhofhhilhgvmecuhfgrshhtofgrihhlpdggtfgf nhhsuhgsshgtrhhisggvpdfurfetoffkrfgpnffqhgenuceurghilhhouhhtmecufedttd enucesvcftvggtihhpihgvnhhtshculddquddttddmnecujfgurhepfffhvfevuffkfhgg tggujgesthdtredttddtvdenucfhrhhomhepifhrvghgucfmjfcuoehgrhgvgheskhhroh grhhdrtghomheqnecuggftrfgrthhtvghrnhepheegvdevvdeljeeugfdtudduhfekledt iefhveejkeejuefhtdeufefhgfehkeetnecuvehluhhsthgvrhfuihiivgeptdenucfrrg hrrghmpehmrghilhhfrhhomhepghhrvghgsehkrhhorghhrdgtohhmpdhnsggprhgtphht thhopedutddpmhhouggvpehsmhhtphhouhhtpdhrtghpthhtohepshhfrhestggrnhgsrd gruhhughdrohhrghdrrghupdhrtghpthhtohepjhhonhgrthhhrghnrdhsthhrohhuuges rghmugdrtghomhdprhgtphhtthhopehrrgguhhgvhidrshhhhigrmhdrphgrnhguvgihse grmhgurdgtohhmpdhrtghpthhtoheplhhinhhugidqkhgvrhhnvghlsehvghgvrhdrkhgv rhhnvghlrdhorhhgpdhrtghpthhtoheplhhinhhugidqnhgvgihtsehvghgvrhdrkhgvrh hnvghlrdhorhhg X-ME-Proxy: Feedback-ID: i787e41f1:Fastmail Received: by mail.messagingengine.com (Postfix) with ESMTPA; Fri, 23 May 2025 08:50:19 -0400 (EDT) Date: Fri, 23 May 2025 14:50:17 +0200 From: Greg KH To: Stephen Rothwell Cc: Jonathan Stroud , Radhey Shyam Pandey , Linux Kernel Mailing List , Linux Next Mailing List Subject: Re: linux-next: build warning after merge of the usb tree Message-ID: <2025052309-moisten-antiquity-a888@gregkh> References: <20250523150934.09d99b2b@canb.auug.org.au> Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: linux-next@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20250523150934.09d99b2b@canb.auug.org.au> On Fri, May 23, 2025 at 03:09:34PM +1000, Stephen Rothwell wrote: > Hi all, > > After merging the usb tree, today's linux-next build (arm > multi_v7_defconfig) produced this warning: > > drivers/usb/misc/onboard_usb_dev.c:358:12: warning: 'onboard_dev_5744_i2c_write_byte' defined but not used [-Wunused-function] > 358 | static int onboard_dev_5744_i2c_write_byte(struct i2c_client *client, u16 addr, u8 data) > | ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ > drivers/usb/misc/onboard_usb_dev.c:313:12: warning: 'onboard_dev_5744_i2c_read_byte' defined but not used [-Wunused-function] > 313 | static int onboard_dev_5744_i2c_read_byte(struct i2c_client *client, u16 addr, u8 *data) > | ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ > > Introduced by commit > > 1143d41922c0 ("usb: misc: onboard_usb_dev: Fix usb5744 initialization sequence") Should now be fixed, thanks! greg k-h