From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from smtp.kernel.org (aws-us-west-2-korg-mail-1.web.codeaurora.org [10.30.226.201]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id BA5CF258A; Fri, 30 May 2025 16:44:35 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=10.30.226.201 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1748623475; cv=none; b=jcEB1Llq6pagE/JqLeL0l0UWmQY8AxvClOgM0EueWY3yolY8GLp5wg6RwTgKG1EfEsp4HnL9Van67oMACjnqQXy/jMhmKWS/3bpwRk7CLY5PwAMlcfcqZlDraHWiWIVL3ZHttTlSFyFsbNevC8hqm5FxqnPoNGenYX/qhFHFhto= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1748623475; c=relaxed/simple; bh=W5OpwwUyJIIM5VqI45VotpF5enCBTC5BSFX/2o6LIuo=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:Message-ID:References:MIME-Version: Content-Type:Content-Disposition:In-Reply-To; b=S0b0hjT379MnjVe1rzyWmOQCxak3n9SOe8I0opf+XgMl4kjUcdTV/Smg+r6pP24PrhrPennzRi0FcUFmmh+J/30bHfTnkZzlq4AC4FZahO8Oswt0vi5lRRSIWbb7dL/YDetQifyYcIK1f2hls/6cT7yeHicU3scEWtGf6OaYmJ4= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=kernel.org header.i=@kernel.org header.b=E1LkJqF7; arc=none smtp.client-ip=10.30.226.201 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=kernel.org header.i=@kernel.org header.b="E1LkJqF7" Received: by smtp.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 12162C4CEE9; Fri, 30 May 2025 16:44:33 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=kernel.org; s=k20201202; t=1748623475; bh=W5OpwwUyJIIM5VqI45VotpF5enCBTC5BSFX/2o6LIuo=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:References:In-Reply-To:From; b=E1LkJqF7WWdLxXgE6GXThQxaANeHlK2/YO+4RzDNtgNYnx3C+q6JJV6xO6BzxkDSr rbmBm6Ds4EnWVMylvEy66N0V/cah6rL98swZNnty9fnd/nAQyNoZdWzLRq7ZhsHj7O iXGOS0Pksrut4PgAlL2LECTnwUo6Q18qZdqUQJs3M9EBEkhH6NMc3JGZRYuQaTAQvz n6mKpG3oShMiwwAMwUmrx/u4jqh9h1+nJkeFbXqK4hbvA8ieGj4U7cfguADG8B5u6z LizuhbySsVIo8dDXJk7wJvkNCQ0vHVy9Y4KQgcrsLLhNXgPrGmDWRFTKAwa5qMTsQw 5ayriPv8tcAhw== Date: Fri, 30 May 2025 17:44:31 +0100 From: Lee Jones To: Stephen Rothwell Cc: Arnd Bergmann , ARM , Linux Kernel Mailing List , Linux Next Mailing List Subject: Re: linux-next: duplicate patch in the mfd tree Message-ID: <20250530164431.GB7758@google.com> References: <20250526140400.54ac8a6c@canb.auug.org.au> Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: linux-next@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit In-Reply-To: <20250526140400.54ac8a6c@canb.auug.org.au> On Mon, 26 May 2025, Stephen Rothwell wrote: > Hi all, > > The following commit is also in the arm-soc tree as a different commit > (but the same patch): > > 0ffcf5f1e41c ("dt-bindings: mfd: qcom,tcsr: Add compatible for ipq5018") > > This is commit > > 1d2c5d5f3f44 ("dt-bindings: mfd: qcom,tcsr: Add compatible for ipq5018") > > in the arm-soc tree. Why is this patch in the arm-soc tree? -- Lee Jones [李琼斯]