* linux-next: manual merge of the iio tree with the spi tree
@ 2025-07-03 6:38 Stephen Rothwell
2025-07-03 8:31 ` Jonathan Cameron
0 siblings, 1 reply; 7+ messages in thread
From: Stephen Rothwell @ 2025-07-03 6:38 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Jonathan Cameron, Mark Brown
Cc: David Lechner, Jonathan Santos, Linux Kernel Mailing List,
Linux Next Mailing List
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1906 bytes --]
Hi all,
Today's linux-next merge of the iio tree got a conflict in:
MAINTAINERS
between commit:
e47a324d6f07 ("dt-bindings: trigger-source: add ADI Util Sigma-Delta SPI")
from the spi tree and commit:
0dd88eaa7126 ("dt-bindings: trigger-source: add generic GPIO trigger source")
from the iio tree.
I fixed it up (see below) and can carry the fix as necessary. This
is now fixed as far as linux-next is concerned, but any non trivial
conflicts should be mentioned to your upstream maintainer when your tree
is submitted for merging. You may also want to consider cooperating
with the maintainer of the conflicting tree to minimise any particularly
complex conflicts.
--
Cheers,
Stephen Rothwell
diff --cc MAINTAINERS
index dd764b947dab,d0809d62ff48..000000000000
--- a/MAINTAINERS
+++ b/MAINTAINERS
@@@ -25333,19 -25201,15 +25341,20 @@@ TRADITIONAL CHINESE DOCUMENTATIO
M: Hu Haowen <2023002089@link.tyut.edu.cn>
S: Maintained
W: https://github.com/srcres258/linux-doc
-T: git git://github.com/srcres258/linux-doc.git doc-zh-tw
+T: git https://github.com/srcres258/linux-doc.git doc-zh-tw
F: Documentation/translations/zh_TW/
+ TRIGGER SOURCE
+ M: David Lechner <dlechner@baylibre.com>
+ S: Maintained
+ F: Documentation/devicetree/bindings/trigger-source/gpio-trigger.yaml
+ F: Documentation/devicetree/bindings/trigger-source/pwm-trigger.yaml
+
+TRIGGER SOURCE - ADI UTIL SIGMA DELTA SPI
+M: David Lechner <dlechner@baylibre.com>
+S: Maintained
+F: Documentation/devicetree/bindings/trigger-source/adi,util-sigma-delta-spi.yaml
+
- TRIGGER SOURCE - PWM
- M: David Lechner <dlechner@baylibre.com>
- S: Maintained
- F: Documentation/devicetree/bindings/trigger-source/pwm-trigger.yaml
-
TRUSTED SECURITY MODULE (TSM) INFRASTRUCTURE
M: Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@intel.com>
L: linux-coco@lists.linux.dev
[-- Attachment #2: OpenPGP digital signature --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 488 bytes --]
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 7+ messages in thread* Re: linux-next: manual merge of the iio tree with the spi tree 2025-07-03 6:38 linux-next: manual merge of the iio tree with the spi tree Stephen Rothwell @ 2025-07-03 8:31 ` Jonathan Cameron 2025-07-03 12:28 ` David Lechner 0 siblings, 1 reply; 7+ messages in thread From: Jonathan Cameron @ 2025-07-03 8:31 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Stephen Rothwell, David Lechner Cc: Mark Brown, Jonathan Santos, Linux Kernel Mailing List, Linux Next Mailing List, linux-iio On Thu, 3 Jul 2025 16:38:24 +1000 Stephen Rothwell <sfr@canb.auug.org.au> wrote: > Hi all, > > Today's linux-next merge of the iio tree got a conflict in: > > MAINTAINERS > > between commit: > > e47a324d6f07 ("dt-bindings: trigger-source: add ADI Util Sigma-Delta SPI") > > from the spi tree and commit: > > 0dd88eaa7126 ("dt-bindings: trigger-source: add generic GPIO trigger source") > > from the iio tree. > > I fixed it up (see below) and can carry the fix as necessary. This > is now fixed as far as linux-next is concerned, but any non trivial > conflicts should be mentioned to your upstream maintainer when your tree > is submitted for merging. You may also want to consider cooperating > with the maintainer of the conflicting tree to minimise any particularly > complex conflicts. > Thanks Stephen, David, do you prefer these merged or kept as separate entries? I don't think it matters either way in practice though this is the more complex merge (the other being just putting the blocks in order. We can put a note in the pull request on preference but ultimately Linus will resolve this however he prefers! Jonathan > -- > Cheers, > Stephen Rothwell > > diff --cc MAINTAINERS > index dd764b947dab,d0809d62ff48..000000000000 > --- a/MAINTAINERS > +++ b/MAINTAINERS > @@@ -25333,19 -25201,15 +25341,20 @@@ TRADITIONAL CHINESE DOCUMENTATIO > M: Hu Haowen <2023002089@link.tyut.edu.cn> > S: Maintained > W: https://github.com/srcres258/linux-doc > -T: git git://github.com/srcres258/linux-doc.git doc-zh-tw > +T: git https://github.com/srcres258/linux-doc.git doc-zh-tw > F: Documentation/translations/zh_TW/ > > + TRIGGER SOURCE > + M: David Lechner <dlechner@baylibre.com> > + S: Maintained > + F: Documentation/devicetree/bindings/trigger-source/gpio-trigger.yaml > + F: Documentation/devicetree/bindings/trigger-source/pwm-trigger.yaml > + > +TRIGGER SOURCE - ADI UTIL SIGMA DELTA SPI > +M: David Lechner <dlechner@baylibre.com> > +S: Maintained > +F: Documentation/devicetree/bindings/trigger-source/adi,util-sigma-delta-spi.yaml > + > - TRIGGER SOURCE - PWM > - M: David Lechner <dlechner@baylibre.com> > - S: Maintained > - F: Documentation/devicetree/bindings/trigger-source/pwm-trigger.yaml > - > TRUSTED SECURITY MODULE (TSM) INFRASTRUCTURE > M: Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@intel.com> > L: linux-coco@lists.linux.dev ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 7+ messages in thread
* Re: linux-next: manual merge of the iio tree with the spi tree 2025-07-03 8:31 ` Jonathan Cameron @ 2025-07-03 12:28 ` David Lechner 2025-07-06 10:50 ` Jonathan Cameron 0 siblings, 1 reply; 7+ messages in thread From: David Lechner @ 2025-07-03 12:28 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Jonathan Cameron, Stephen Rothwell Cc: Mark Brown, Jonathan Santos, Linux Kernel Mailing List, Linux Next Mailing List, linux-iio On 7/3/25 3:31 AM, Jonathan Cameron wrote: > On Thu, 3 Jul 2025 16:38:24 +1000 > Stephen Rothwell <sfr@canb.auug.org.au> wrote: > >> Hi all, >> >> Today's linux-next merge of the iio tree got a conflict in: >> >> MAINTAINERS >> >> between commit: >> >> e47a324d6f07 ("dt-bindings: trigger-source: add ADI Util Sigma-Delta SPI") >> >> from the spi tree and commit: >> >> 0dd88eaa7126 ("dt-bindings: trigger-source: add generic GPIO trigger source") >> >> from the iio tree. >> >> I fixed it up (see below) and can carry the fix as necessary. This >> is now fixed as far as linux-next is concerned, but any non trivial >> conflicts should be mentioned to your upstream maintainer when your tree >> is submitted for merging. You may also want to consider cooperating >> with the maintainer of the conflicting tree to minimise any particularly >> complex conflicts. >> > Thanks Stephen, > > David, do you prefer these merged or kept as separate entries? Ah, shoot, I forgot that we had added the gpio one and just made one section like this. I think it would make sense to also merge the new adi one with the reset to keep things compact. > > I don't think it matters either way in practice though this is the > more complex merge (the other being just putting the blocks in order. > > We can put a note in the pull request on preference but ultimately Linus > will resolve this however he prefers! > > Jonathan > > >> -- >> Cheers, >> Stephen Rothwell >> >> diff --cc MAINTAINERS >> index dd764b947dab,d0809d62ff48..000000000000 >> --- a/MAINTAINERS >> +++ b/MAINTAINERS >> @@@ -25333,19 -25201,15 +25341,20 @@@ TRADITIONAL CHINESE DOCUMENTATIO >> M: Hu Haowen <2023002089@link.tyut.edu.cn> >> S: Maintained >> W: https://github.com/srcres258/linux-doc >> -T: git git://github.com/srcres258/linux-doc.git doc-zh-tw >> +T: git https://github.com/srcres258/linux-doc.git doc-zh-tw >> F: Documentation/translations/zh_TW/ >> >> + TRIGGER SOURCE >> + M: David Lechner <dlechner@baylibre.com> >> + S: Maintained >> + F: Documentation/devicetree/bindings/trigger-source/gpio-trigger.yaml >> + F: Documentation/devicetree/bindings/trigger-source/pwm-trigger.yaml >> + >> +TRIGGER SOURCE - ADI UTIL SIGMA DELTA SPI >> +M: David Lechner <dlechner@baylibre.com> >> +S: Maintained >> +F: Documentation/devicetree/bindings/trigger-source/adi,util-sigma-delta-spi.yaml >> + >> - TRIGGER SOURCE - PWM >> - M: David Lechner <dlechner@baylibre.com> >> - S: Maintained >> - F: Documentation/devicetree/bindings/trigger-source/pwm-trigger.yaml >> - >> TRUSTED SECURITY MODULE (TSM) INFRASTRUCTURE >> M: Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@intel.com> >> L: linux-coco@lists.linux.dev ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 7+ messages in thread
* Re: linux-next: manual merge of the iio tree with the spi tree 2025-07-03 12:28 ` David Lechner @ 2025-07-06 10:50 ` Jonathan Cameron 2025-07-06 16:15 ` David Lechner 0 siblings, 1 reply; 7+ messages in thread From: Jonathan Cameron @ 2025-07-06 10:50 UTC (permalink / raw) To: David Lechner Cc: Jonathan Cameron, Stephen Rothwell, Mark Brown, Jonathan Santos, Linux Kernel Mailing List, Linux Next Mailing List, linux-iio On Thu, 3 Jul 2025 07:28:07 -0500 David Lechner <dlechner@baylibre.com> wrote: > On 7/3/25 3:31 AM, Jonathan Cameron wrote: > > On Thu, 3 Jul 2025 16:38:24 +1000 > > Stephen Rothwell <sfr@canb.auug.org.au> wrote: > > > >> Hi all, > >> > >> Today's linux-next merge of the iio tree got a conflict in: > >> > >> MAINTAINERS > >> > >> between commit: > >> > >> e47a324d6f07 ("dt-bindings: trigger-source: add ADI Util Sigma-Delta SPI") > >> > >> from the spi tree and commit: > >> > >> 0dd88eaa7126 ("dt-bindings: trigger-source: add generic GPIO trigger source") > >> > >> from the iio tree. > >> > >> I fixed it up (see below) and can carry the fix as necessary. This > >> is now fixed as far as linux-next is concerned, but any non trivial > >> conflicts should be mentioned to your upstream maintainer when your tree > >> is submitted for merging. You may also want to consider cooperating > >> with the maintainer of the conflicting tree to minimise any particularly > >> complex conflicts. > >> > > Thanks Stephen, > > > > David, do you prefer these merged or kept as separate entries? > > Ah, shoot, I forgot that we had added the gpio one and just made > one section like this. > > I think it would make sense to also merge the new adi one with > the reset to keep things compact. > Is there a path to do that cleanly given the multiple trees things are coming from? Maybe this is a let things resolve whatever way this cycle and tidy up next? > > > > I don't think it matters either way in practice though this is the > > more complex merge (the other being just putting the blocks in order. > > > > We can put a note in the pull request on preference but ultimately Linus > > will resolve this however he prefers! > > > > Jonathan > > > > > >> -- > >> Cheers, > >> Stephen Rothwell > >> > >> diff --cc MAINTAINERS > >> index dd764b947dab,d0809d62ff48..000000000000 > >> --- a/MAINTAINERS > >> +++ b/MAINTAINERS > >> @@@ -25333,19 -25201,15 +25341,20 @@@ TRADITIONAL CHINESE DOCUMENTATIO > >> M: Hu Haowen <2023002089@link.tyut.edu.cn> > >> S: Maintained > >> W: https://github.com/srcres258/linux-doc > >> -T: git git://github.com/srcres258/linux-doc.git doc-zh-tw > >> +T: git https://github.com/srcres258/linux-doc.git doc-zh-tw > >> F: Documentation/translations/zh_TW/ > >> > >> + TRIGGER SOURCE > >> + M: David Lechner <dlechner@baylibre.com> > >> + S: Maintained > >> + F: Documentation/devicetree/bindings/trigger-source/gpio-trigger.yaml > >> + F: Documentation/devicetree/bindings/trigger-source/pwm-trigger.yaml > >> + > >> +TRIGGER SOURCE - ADI UTIL SIGMA DELTA SPI > >> +M: David Lechner <dlechner@baylibre.com> > >> +S: Maintained > >> +F: Documentation/devicetree/bindings/trigger-source/adi,util-sigma-delta-spi.yaml > >> + > >> - TRIGGER SOURCE - PWM > >> - M: David Lechner <dlechner@baylibre.com> > >> - S: Maintained > >> - F: Documentation/devicetree/bindings/trigger-source/pwm-trigger.yaml > >> - > >> TRUSTED SECURITY MODULE (TSM) INFRASTRUCTURE > >> M: Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@intel.com> > >> L: linux-coco@lists.linux.dev > > ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 7+ messages in thread
* Re: linux-next: manual merge of the iio tree with the spi tree 2025-07-06 10:50 ` Jonathan Cameron @ 2025-07-06 16:15 ` David Lechner 2025-07-21 2:55 ` Stephen Rothwell 0 siblings, 1 reply; 7+ messages in thread From: David Lechner @ 2025-07-06 16:15 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Jonathan Cameron Cc: Jonathan Cameron, Stephen Rothwell, Mark Brown, Jonathan Santos, Linux Kernel Mailing List, Linux Next Mailing List, linux-iio On 7/6/25 5:50 AM, Jonathan Cameron wrote: > On Thu, 3 Jul 2025 07:28:07 -0500 > David Lechner <dlechner@baylibre.com> wrote: > >> On 7/3/25 3:31 AM, Jonathan Cameron wrote: >>> On Thu, 3 Jul 2025 16:38:24 +1000 >>> Stephen Rothwell <sfr@canb.auug.org.au> wrote: >>> >>>> Hi all, >>>> >>>> Today's linux-next merge of the iio tree got a conflict in: >>>> >>>> MAINTAINERS >>>> >>>> between commit: >>>> >>>> e47a324d6f07 ("dt-bindings: trigger-source: add ADI Util Sigma-Delta SPI") >>>> >>>> from the spi tree and commit: >>>> >>>> 0dd88eaa7126 ("dt-bindings: trigger-source: add generic GPIO trigger source") >>>> >>>> from the iio tree. >>>> >>>> I fixed it up (see below) and can carry the fix as necessary. This >>>> is now fixed as far as linux-next is concerned, but any non trivial >>>> conflicts should be mentioned to your upstream maintainer when your tree >>>> is submitted for merging. You may also want to consider cooperating >>>> with the maintainer of the conflicting tree to minimise any particularly >>>> complex conflicts. >>>> >>> Thanks Stephen, >>> >>> David, do you prefer these merged or kept as separate entries? >> >> Ah, shoot, I forgot that we had added the gpio one and just made >> one section like this. >> >> I think it would make sense to also merge the new adi one with >> the reset to keep things compact. >> > Is there a path to do that cleanly given the multiple trees things are > coming from? Maybe this is a let things resolve whatever way this cycle > and tidy up next? Agree, waiting seems the simplest option. > >>> >>> I don't think it matters either way in practice though this is the >>> more complex merge (the other being just putting the blocks in order. >>> >>> We can put a note in the pull request on preference but ultimately Linus >>> will resolve this however he prefers! >>> >>> Jonathan >>> >>> >>>> -- >>>> Cheers, >>>> Stephen Rothwell >>>> >>>> diff --cc MAINTAINERS >>>> index dd764b947dab,d0809d62ff48..000000000000 >>>> --- a/MAINTAINERS >>>> +++ b/MAINTAINERS >>>> @@@ -25333,19 -25201,15 +25341,20 @@@ TRADITIONAL CHINESE DOCUMENTATIO >>>> M: Hu Haowen <2023002089@link.tyut.edu.cn> >>>> S: Maintained >>>> W: https://github.com/srcres258/linux-doc >>>> -T: git git://github.com/srcres258/linux-doc.git doc-zh-tw >>>> +T: git https://github.com/srcres258/linux-doc.git doc-zh-tw >>>> F: Documentation/translations/zh_TW/ >>>> >>>> + TRIGGER SOURCE >>>> + M: David Lechner <dlechner@baylibre.com> >>>> + S: Maintained >>>> + F: Documentation/devicetree/bindings/trigger-source/gpio-trigger.yaml >>>> + F: Documentation/devicetree/bindings/trigger-source/pwm-trigger.yaml >>>> + >>>> +TRIGGER SOURCE - ADI UTIL SIGMA DELTA SPI >>>> +M: David Lechner <dlechner@baylibre.com> >>>> +S: Maintained >>>> +F: Documentation/devicetree/bindings/trigger-source/adi,util-sigma-delta-spi.yaml >>>> + >>>> - TRIGGER SOURCE - PWM >>>> - M: David Lechner <dlechner@baylibre.com> >>>> - S: Maintained >>>> - F: Documentation/devicetree/bindings/trigger-source/pwm-trigger.yaml >>>> - >>>> TRUSTED SECURITY MODULE (TSM) INFRASTRUCTURE >>>> M: Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@intel.com> >>>> L: linux-coco@lists.linux.dev >> >> > ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 7+ messages in thread
* Re: linux-next: manual merge of the iio tree with the spi tree 2025-07-06 16:15 ` David Lechner @ 2025-07-21 2:55 ` Stephen Rothwell 2025-07-24 13:49 ` Jonathan Cameron 0 siblings, 1 reply; 7+ messages in thread From: Stephen Rothwell @ 2025-07-21 2:55 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Mark Brown, Greg KH, Arnd Bergmann Cc: David Lechner, Jonathan Cameron, Jonathan Cameron, Jonathan Santos, Linux Kernel Mailing List, Linux Next Mailing List, linux-iio [-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 3692 bytes --] Hi all, On Sun, 6 Jul 2025 11:15:14 -0500 David Lechner <dlechner@baylibre.com> wrote: > > On 7/6/25 5:50 AM, Jonathan Cameron wrote: > > On Thu, 3 Jul 2025 07:28:07 -0500 > > David Lechner <dlechner@baylibre.com> wrote: > > > >> On 7/3/25 3:31 AM, Jonathan Cameron wrote: > >>> On Thu, 3 Jul 2025 16:38:24 +1000 > >>> Stephen Rothwell <sfr@canb.auug.org.au> wrote: > >>> > >>>> Today's linux-next merge of the iio tree got a conflict in: > >>>> > >>>> MAINTAINERS > >>>> > >>>> between commit: > >>>> > >>>> e47a324d6f07 ("dt-bindings: trigger-source: add ADI Util Sigma-Delta SPI") > >>>> > >>>> from the spi tree and commit: > >>>> > >>>> 0dd88eaa7126 ("dt-bindings: trigger-source: add generic GPIO trigger source") > >>>> > >>>> from the iio tree. > >>>> > >>>> I fixed it up (see below) and can carry the fix as necessary. This > >>>> is now fixed as far as linux-next is concerned, but any non trivial > >>>> conflicts should be mentioned to your upstream maintainer when your tree > >>>> is submitted for merging. You may also want to consider cooperating > >>>> with the maintainer of the conflicting tree to minimise any particularly > >>>> complex conflicts. > >>>> > >>> Thanks Stephen, > >>> > >>> David, do you prefer these merged or kept as separate entries? > >> > >> Ah, shoot, I forgot that we had added the gpio one and just made > >> one section like this. > >> > >> I think it would make sense to also merge the new adi one with > >> the reset to keep things compact. > >> > > Is there a path to do that cleanly given the multiple trees things are > > coming from? Maybe this is a let things resolve whatever way this cycle > > and tidy up next? > > Agree, waiting seems the simplest option. > > > > >>> > >>> I don't think it matters either way in practice though this is the > >>> more complex merge (the other being just putting the blocks in order. > >>> > >>> We can put a note in the pull request on preference but ultimately Linus > >>> will resolve this however he prefers! > >>> > >>> Jonathan > >>> > >>> > >>>> -- > >>>> Cheers, > >>>> Stephen Rothwell > >>>> > >>>> diff --cc MAINTAINERS > >>>> index dd764b947dab,d0809d62ff48..000000000000 > >>>> --- a/MAINTAINERS > >>>> +++ b/MAINTAINERS > >>>> @@@ -25333,19 -25201,15 +25341,20 @@@ TRADITIONAL CHINESE DOCUMENTATIO > >>>> M: Hu Haowen <2023002089@link.tyut.edu.cn> > >>>> S: Maintained > >>>> W: https://github.com/srcres258/linux-doc > >>>> -T: git git://github.com/srcres258/linux-doc.git doc-zh-tw > >>>> +T: git https://github.com/srcres258/linux-doc.git doc-zh-tw > >>>> F: Documentation/translations/zh_TW/ > >>>> > >>>> + TRIGGER SOURCE > >>>> + M: David Lechner <dlechner@baylibre.com> > >>>> + S: Maintained > >>>> + F: Documentation/devicetree/bindings/trigger-source/gpio-trigger.yaml > >>>> + F: Documentation/devicetree/bindings/trigger-source/pwm-trigger.yaml > >>>> + > >>>> +TRIGGER SOURCE - ADI UTIL SIGMA DELTA SPI > >>>> +M: David Lechner <dlechner@baylibre.com> > >>>> +S: Maintained > >>>> +F: Documentation/devicetree/bindings/trigger-source/adi,util-sigma-delta-spi.yaml > >>>> + > >>>> - TRIGGER SOURCE - PWM > >>>> - M: David Lechner <dlechner@baylibre.com> > >>>> - S: Maintained > >>>> - F: Documentation/devicetree/bindings/trigger-source/pwm-trigger.yaml > >>>> - > >>>> TRUSTED SECURITY MODULE (TSM) INFRASTRUCTURE > >>>> M: Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@intel.com> > >>>> L: linux-coco@lists.linux.dev This is now a conflict between the char-misc tree and the spi tree. -- Cheers, Stephen Rothwell [-- Attachment #2: OpenPGP digital signature --] [-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 488 bytes --] ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 7+ messages in thread
* Re: linux-next: manual merge of the iio tree with the spi tree 2025-07-21 2:55 ` Stephen Rothwell @ 2025-07-24 13:49 ` Jonathan Cameron 0 siblings, 0 replies; 7+ messages in thread From: Jonathan Cameron @ 2025-07-24 13:49 UTC (permalink / raw) To: Stephen Rothwell Cc: Mark Brown, Greg KH, Arnd Bergmann, David Lechner, Jonathan Cameron, Jonathan Santos, Linux Kernel Mailing List, Linux Next Mailing List, linux-iio On Mon, 21 Jul 2025 12:55:45 +1000 Stephen Rothwell <sfr@canb.auug.org.au> wrote: > Hi all, > > On Sun, 6 Jul 2025 11:15:14 -0500 David Lechner <dlechner@baylibre.com> wrote: > > > > On 7/6/25 5:50 AM, Jonathan Cameron wrote: > > > On Thu, 3 Jul 2025 07:28:07 -0500 > > > David Lechner <dlechner@baylibre.com> wrote: > > > > > >> On 7/3/25 3:31 AM, Jonathan Cameron wrote: > > >>> On Thu, 3 Jul 2025 16:38:24 +1000 > > >>> Stephen Rothwell <sfr@canb.auug.org.au> wrote: > > >>> > > >>>> Today's linux-next merge of the iio tree got a conflict in: > > >>>> > > >>>> MAINTAINERS > > >>>> > > >>>> between commit: > > >>>> > > >>>> e47a324d6f07 ("dt-bindings: trigger-source: add ADI Util Sigma-Delta SPI") > > >>>> > > >>>> from the spi tree and commit: > > >>>> > > >>>> 0dd88eaa7126 ("dt-bindings: trigger-source: add generic GPIO trigger source") > > >>>> > > >>>> from the iio tree. > > >>>> > > >>>> I fixed it up (see below) and can carry the fix as necessary. This > > >>>> is now fixed as far as linux-next is concerned, but any non trivial > > >>>> conflicts should be mentioned to your upstream maintainer when your tree > > >>>> is submitted for merging. You may also want to consider cooperating > > >>>> with the maintainer of the conflicting tree to minimise any particularly > > >>>> complex conflicts. > > >>>> > > >>> Thanks Stephen, > > >>> > > >>> David, do you prefer these merged or kept as separate entries? > > >> > > >> Ah, shoot, I forgot that we had added the gpio one and just made > > >> one section like this. > > >> > > >> I think it would make sense to also merge the new adi one with > > >> the reset to keep things compact. > > >> > > > Is there a path to do that cleanly given the multiple trees things are > > > coming from? Maybe this is a let things resolve whatever way this cycle > > > and tidy up next? > > > > Agree, waiting seems the simplest option. > > > > > > > >>> > > >>> I don't think it matters either way in practice though this is the > > >>> more complex merge (the other being just putting the blocks in order. > > >>> > > >>> We can put a note in the pull request on preference but ultimately Linus > > >>> will resolve this however he prefers! > > >>> > > >>> Jonathan > > >>> > > >>> > > >>>> -- > > >>>> Cheers, > > >>>> Stephen Rothwell > > >>>> > > >>>> diff --cc MAINTAINERS > > >>>> index dd764b947dab,d0809d62ff48..000000000000 > > >>>> --- a/MAINTAINERS > > >>>> +++ b/MAINTAINERS > > >>>> @@@ -25333,19 -25201,15 +25341,20 @@@ TRADITIONAL CHINESE DOCUMENTATIO > > >>>> M: Hu Haowen <2023002089@link.tyut.edu.cn> > > >>>> S: Maintained > > >>>> W: https://github.com/srcres258/linux-doc > > >>>> -T: git git://github.com/srcres258/linux-doc.git doc-zh-tw > > >>>> +T: git https://github.com/srcres258/linux-doc.git doc-zh-tw > > >>>> F: Documentation/translations/zh_TW/ > > >>>> > > >>>> + TRIGGER SOURCE > > >>>> + M: David Lechner <dlechner@baylibre.com> > > >>>> + S: Maintained > > >>>> + F: Documentation/devicetree/bindings/trigger-source/gpio-trigger.yaml > > >>>> + F: Documentation/devicetree/bindings/trigger-source/pwm-trigger.yaml > > >>>> + > > >>>> +TRIGGER SOURCE - ADI UTIL SIGMA DELTA SPI > > >>>> +M: David Lechner <dlechner@baylibre.com> > > >>>> +S: Maintained > > >>>> +F: Documentation/devicetree/bindings/trigger-source/adi,util-sigma-delta-spi.yaml > > >>>> + > > >>>> - TRIGGER SOURCE - PWM > > >>>> - M: David Lechner <dlechner@baylibre.com> > > >>>> - S: Maintained > > >>>> - F: Documentation/devicetree/bindings/trigger-source/pwm-trigger.yaml > > >>>> - > > >>>> TRUSTED SECURITY MODULE (TSM) INFRASTRUCTURE > > >>>> M: Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@intel.com> > > >>>> L: linux-coco@lists.linux.dev > > This is now a conflict between the char-misc tree and the spi tree. Ah. Sorry Greg, I meant to mention this in the pull request. In earlier discussion we concluded that best bet was to let it resolve as separate entries (as Stephen has) and then we'll clean it up next cycle if it makes sense to unify more of them. Thanks Stephen for dealing with our mess! Jonathan > ^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 7+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2025-07-24 13:49 UTC | newest] Thread overview: 7+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed -- links below jump to the message on this page -- 2025-07-03 6:38 linux-next: manual merge of the iio tree with the spi tree Stephen Rothwell 2025-07-03 8:31 ` Jonathan Cameron 2025-07-03 12:28 ` David Lechner 2025-07-06 10:50 ` Jonathan Cameron 2025-07-06 16:15 ` David Lechner 2025-07-21 2:55 ` Stephen Rothwell 2025-07-24 13:49 ` Jonathan Cameron
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox