From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from smtp.kernel.org (aws-us-west-2-korg-mail-1.web.codeaurora.org [10.30.226.201]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 5D1582367CD; Fri, 25 Jul 2025 11:35:58 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=10.30.226.201 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1753443358; cv=none; b=QLRCSVcV2faNcOh4eXAGMQT1iBc081wxSQHgXjRNknK/mQRZNGU3l4JXnxfxZek1QxQRRO7FTgScn1B+Yg6otDyW0AwvfrWwfNBl1NNA0+40FNsZO0jMXEpldq/LCVx4tELWw7zayLRR2fFcHOJlifYr9a9P/YdrsPsMEz5PEK4= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1753443358; c=relaxed/simple; bh=+PL5Ce46pzzEvE5wbz43WCE0ZQpyW3u8CV4e5f9V7WU=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:Message-ID:References:MIME-Version: Content-Type:Content-Disposition:In-Reply-To; b=Dne59Jl/k3U/AKsanUwPxncXAqDg0EBEkZHJqAQYlbY0FSLAo/NHx2y0o5fzILMDIYZ5UwWPkriGSmHsU2S9Vb0cy5EmBux1ZQT+S5OkQEWyYiIN0wXT0rvksLVHuqwhkaCkebLLDvk+/D079DQnACilT9Xh/lbQyHjz09KTcWM= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=kernel.org header.i=@kernel.org header.b=LdCIUE60; arc=none smtp.client-ip=10.30.226.201 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=kernel.org header.i=@kernel.org header.b="LdCIUE60" Received: by smtp.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 74337C4CEE7; Fri, 25 Jul 2025 11:35:56 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=kernel.org; s=k20201202; t=1753443357; bh=+PL5Ce46pzzEvE5wbz43WCE0ZQpyW3u8CV4e5f9V7WU=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:References:In-Reply-To:From; b=LdCIUE603IEMZwVAMQub69g3JUAfY4Axyb5S53r0VqEjed8cHWrz77xcSZtk5Y+yE Z308hsoyDDs1Lox/W68/IMJAEeGVMzJf+9owAcUM60mlWLZh7ht/5LRxJSdkyyaskw KF15GAyt1hIi5XQjJRbP/DEFtY2fiEcSK2Ofj7lshn7rTbWvV6FRb6vFaMOSKMoFW+ 2B9fQfU24fjHM7sX5Mz+Gd2e8hI9bXD7y0fuBUZ4SfM1b8Ia4M1x+9ppdgrBSkO2ge YaCC4ZGUuOodeLqB2Yddm1H2RKT6A6uJxAWglP9bmO5jFK9/TsXV+zVu6BOnVeF8r+ 49U84M63+dciQ== Date: Fri, 25 Jul 2025 12:35:39 +0100 From: Lee Jones To: Stephen Rothwell Cc: Arnd Bergmann , ARM , Linux Kernel Mailing List , Linux Next Mailing List Subject: Re: linux-next: duplicate patch in the mfd tree Message-ID: <20250725113539.GB11056@google.com> References: <20250725113657.039aa5ce@canb.auug.org.au> Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: linux-next@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit In-Reply-To: <20250725113657.039aa5ce@canb.auug.org.au> On Fri, 25 Jul 2025, Stephen Rothwell wrote: > Hi all, > > The following commit is also in the arm-soc tree as a different commit > (but the same patch): > > ba9ae011e837 ("soc: apple: rtkit: Make shmem_destroy optional") > > This is commit > > 0445eee835d6 ("soc: apple: rtkit: Make shmem_destroy optional") Odd. I don't see an applied email for this. This was applied to MFD and a pull-request was provided for the other subsystems: https://lore.kernel.org/all/20250724102529.GA11056@google.com/ -- Lee Jones [李琼斯]