From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from smtp.kernel.org (aws-us-west-2-korg-mail-1.web.codeaurora.org [10.30.226.201]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 62592215F5C; Tue, 16 Sep 2025 08:32:35 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=10.30.226.201 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1758011555; cv=none; b=HFZxQKVXRFv8GuN4kbwElzPaVDBmcT9pPi/5kQI9GfnovIkRuZafMWm7ZibL/R8QpnMZntOvYeiqeXHLgeoQ5mGnfzdbaKIvzl7StXqPSvLvk1BP9KsR5kq7b5NfTzjgazsXA7OmrcVB8MqIRQ9knrlG7bAs0fvsI93bZSNoxDI= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1758011555; c=relaxed/simple; bh=cKFv7ntAXKuYYS/5r/qpGiz/+cmnwART8v4KQX5vKFk=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:Message-ID:References:MIME-Version: Content-Type:Content-Disposition:In-Reply-To; b=MztLyfJaY01yjsvvgIPeH/DLhbeGt2jkKgJM2K29A9YwB/IZ1Blk99N9OaCDXBuY0AM8iuSkrzZK4oGmfbW6RSeue7xZtLB5bdkHIR4gVRvDsk0U9cXGAmN9GeGtyXOQoMgQZPFPYhb5vRpLNScXHRNu/jq+WCoCp3Pqg3T05YQ= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=kernel.org header.i=@kernel.org header.b=t79J+gca; arc=none smtp.client-ip=10.30.226.201 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=kernel.org header.i=@kernel.org header.b="t79J+gca" Received: by smtp.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id D401DC4CEEB; Tue, 16 Sep 2025 08:32:33 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=kernel.org; s=k20201202; t=1758011554; bh=cKFv7ntAXKuYYS/5r/qpGiz/+cmnwART8v4KQX5vKFk=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:References:In-Reply-To:From; b=t79J+gcaq28840dZctdvbTNCoWfQ0SvWIBRKtvrDwRkeLE4/VfbOfmvuzVD90qXqU 5frjI2Yz4ERJZpcFwQOnscrcJjf7Dckx9jMJtW9nSH28oV4aYRgzRF8xkQNtNw2Vec h2qg25pLn+QCkjbsqYzauY6jLSQrbNOm7ufluP4qRGunWDy0qBAYSUivTNgx1hDAkm XFg2wmjoobbY537HWJUEz40W+LRAA6id0FlNPXYCl/jw0aY425Op+E6lcYROK28DPf u3XhdTZvVZrflZdGa1h5UBUoDZlHluSn+zN142SaXSiJRHkqnFw4w0QJNKqU37vK+c LE77QWjFoU06A== Date: Tue, 16 Sep 2025 09:32:31 +0100 From: Lee Jones To: Stephen Rothwell Cc: Bartosz Golaszewski , Linux Kernel Mailing List , Linux Next Mailing List Subject: Re: linux-next: duplicate patches in the gpio-brgl tree Message-ID: <20250916083231.GD1637058@google.com> References: <20250912131830.773a6929@canb.auug.org.au> Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: linux-next@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit In-Reply-To: <20250912131830.773a6929@canb.auug.org.au> On Fri, 12 Sep 2025, Stephen Rothwell wrote: > Hi all, > > The following commits are also in the mfd tree as different commits > (but the same patches): > > 9b33bbc084ac ("mfd: vexpress-sysreg: Use new generic GPIO chip API") > 1efbee6852f1 ("mfd: vexpress-sysreg: Check the return value of devm_gpiochip_add_data()") > > These are commits > > e2d401a6c9eb ("mfd: vexpress-sysreg: Use new generic GPIO chip API") > edfd67239981 ("mfd: vexpress-sysreg: Check the return value of devm_gpiochip_add_data()") > > in the mfd tree. -ENOPUSH. -- Lee Jones [李琼斯]