Re: linux-next: manual merge of the arm64 tree with the kbuild tree

[Nathan Chancellor <nathan@kernel.org>]

On Thu, Sep 25, 2025 at 02:08:00PM +0100, Mark Brown wrote:
> Hi all,
> 
> Today's linux-next merge of the arm64 tree got a conflict in:
> 
>   arch/arm64/Kconfig
> 
> between commit:
> 
>   23cb0514208da ("arm64: Remove tautological LLVM Kconfig conditions")
> 
> from the kbuild tree and commit:
> 
>   1cf89b6bf660c ("arm64: Kconfig: Make CPU_BIG_ENDIAN depend on BROKEN")
> 
> from the arm64 tree.
> 
> I fixed it up (see below) and can carry the fix as necessary. This
> is now fixed as far as linux-next is concerned, but any non trivial
> conflicts should be mentioned to your upstream maintainer when your tree
> is submitted for merging.  You may also want to consider cooperating
> with the maintainer of the conflicting tree to minimise any particularly
> complex conflicts.
> 
> diff --cc arch/arm64/Kconfig
> index 56eec3586ff77,69bde40e19e23..0000000000000
> --- a/arch/arm64/Kconfig
> +++ b/arch/arm64/Kconfig
> @@@ -1492,6 -1494,8 +1494,7 @@@ choic
>   
>   config CPU_BIG_ENDIAN
>   	bool "Build big-endian kernel"
>  -	# https://github.com/llvm/llvm-project/commit/1379b150991f70a5782e9a143c2ba5308da1161c
>  -	depends on (AS_IS_GNU || AS_VERSION >= 150000) && BROKEN
> ++	depends on BROKEN
>   	help
>   	  Say Y if you plan on running a kernel with a big-endian userspace.
>   

Thanks for the heads up, this looks correct to me.

Cheers,
Nathan