From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from smtp.kernel.org (aws-us-west-2-korg-mail-1.web.codeaurora.org [10.30.226.201]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id D584F1547F2; Wed, 1 Oct 2025 12:50:32 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=10.30.226.201 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1759323032; cv=none; b=gS8PbBZISKI4BjA2ttUIifJkuK4gvo4VisyiTXjjjS7eaDY+PVJ7slHEhn7Itb0vYx86Cu1sfBHyaPy6m8lU6ZCjkFig4oAUg/I05g7cSECRg7wm/a5xIC3YHxh5Li/dytxh0EyA9nCJ8oQM5R2ppVvObR0YlPwSme/EDsrl538= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1759323032; c=relaxed/simple; bh=uHq8wYDUhs4uc88I55ik1um76kTHQDHbX/YMjgz3fX0=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:Message-ID:References:MIME-Version: Content-Type:Content-Disposition:In-Reply-To; b=Yt0aB0bieEIfDtep7UOw9L9ESzmNlRuN+l5ObmN83Ohej9gPK9JflzsK39j8vneIhyahYxPs1Wdyqi3U/YnwKUmNu5aSPvJuMm3aIzrWX9lrRzhQDuABhNJYhFnxBYdtZIgMnrV5KkzZJSgpkr8jdHEQVhmEuD9z12hjx+JodIY= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=kernel.org header.i=@kernel.org header.b=GBewT8F2; arc=none smtp.client-ip=10.30.226.201 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=kernel.org header.i=@kernel.org header.b="GBewT8F2" Received: by smtp.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 30850C4CEF4; Wed, 1 Oct 2025 12:50:31 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=kernel.org; s=k20201202; t=1759323032; bh=uHq8wYDUhs4uc88I55ik1um76kTHQDHbX/YMjgz3fX0=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:References:In-Reply-To:From; b=GBewT8F2lnM4XtQyAV5NvgtiDLxcjTHbj8o6Er2yKDj0md1iKW3npsGVq3QnDX0Ek GfxhNwG8ygfjlTKazugwymkOi9Jhz0ZA4FN3BFtiGuSPaDb2IkG7VWtM9kq4EFd99I pVQXgpUtvmgyfaPSO0xZKt9h/z+yIvwXhOY1Nl7p46Ly/UpnnQAUVO3MD2EzHCNXTf QlPuDMESYAe/E4zOwfDAw0Jy1RD4py+RfMqOS+OecQdC5abp4eNk9FZ1uWPSF+1Y4q 4W9J/XwnFLKlxdr8nXer8MfuSqbFa+d1qalm3H3ltblDbPqo71PdoNmoUaFA+2PTmE WnPUV6iwOi31A== Date: Wed, 1 Oct 2025 13:50:28 +0100 From: Lee Jones To: Mark Brown Cc: Alexander Stein , Bartosz Golaszewski , Linux Kernel Mailing List , Linux Next Mailing List Subject: Re: linux-next: build failure after merge of the mfd tree Message-ID: <20251001125028.GS8757@google.com> References: <20251001095108.GO8757@google.com> Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: linux-next@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit In-Reply-To: On Wed, 01 Oct 2025, Mark Brown wrote: > On Wed, Oct 01, 2025 at 10:51:08AM +0100, Lee Jones wrote: > > On Wed, 17 Sep 2025, Mark Brown wrote: > > > > After merging the mfd tree, today's linux-next build (x86_64 allmodconfig) > > > failed like this: > > > > Caused by commit > > > > df6a44003953f ("mfd: stmpe: Allow building as module") > > > > which needs commit > > > > 03db20aaa3ba3 ("gpio: stmpe: Allow to compile as a module") > > > > from the gpio tree. I have used the version from yesterday instead. > > > Isn't the later already in -next? > > Your tree gets merged first so we get a build failure when your tree is > merged, it would get sorted out eventually when the gpio trees are added > but all the intermediate builds are broken. Interesting. I thought the point of -next was to test everything integrated. Thanks for the heads-up though. I'll wait until this has been merged before sending out my own PR to Linus. -- Lee Jones [李琼斯]