From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from casper.infradead.org (casper.infradead.org [90.155.50.34]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id C7DDB31326D; Fri, 31 Oct 2025 09:21:53 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=90.155.50.34 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1761902517; cv=none; b=Br3YyCMEYn8xNTqOwW7AYNElHYqj4ypcTJPMNExAwP/ros9e8dbYBtQ6uAjc2SBueYHeMHG1lz/WKGCm8GFZ80jwvSga2RA9fy/uRWll+o/mwWI+6cL9Y1JGJ+PjOquU6s4ahEHZgeRfCDUvv8yTBCBFGmIOAec4ZXt8MpbeX1w= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1761902517; c=relaxed/simple; bh=P8lmUHVy6+JErlTKQ11ZXwHGapmy5YNjMPzeJKhB1dc=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:Message-ID:References:MIME-Version: Content-Type:Content-Disposition:In-Reply-To; b=i2aIJQ0eSOTZGNvkGPTvFbny1g2pI0AJIV//+4gLpv7Yd2bspWNIKqlKJ99T5MBDB0McP1e/NptdCsAAYoZ36WhSOLnXiALit4zVEYkdlRkdMx2ND9CA8IjP5qNwBJtAe4hpCaTr+rTfuIScP1MbTbO7/tANXzZzmMUJrxGkoJU= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=infradead.org; spf=none smtp.mailfrom=infradead.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=infradead.org header.i=@infradead.org header.b=RP/fNbsQ; arc=none smtp.client-ip=90.155.50.34 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=infradead.org Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; spf=none smtp.mailfrom=infradead.org Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=infradead.org header.i=@infradead.org header.b="RP/fNbsQ" DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=infradead.org; s=casper.20170209; h=In-Reply-To:Content-Transfer-Encoding: Content-Type:MIME-Version:References:Message-ID:Subject:Cc:To:From:Date: Sender:Reply-To:Content-ID:Content-Description; bh=P8lmUHVy6+JErlTKQ11ZXwHGapmy5YNjMPzeJKhB1dc=; b=RP/fNbsQk07nW3vUX+hvsiwaOe 9lD48FP8byFXMlFETq4xellwFUPnQMMxJjZwIK/CXcacD2/8hVeG1knwJGVVwaB+MQbIsHTpBebZ8 Tq2nD0XxlpjjQIsc71WoW6+j9vn8tD4kKOK0tQIY9+up7Vm6njtrsz5KWz0Dt0N/wxOla/p20vALT U6Epbt9bGkBGwOTYfma76Qw3lrA6DdxPFhW3zF/Jlsk0R3ER1+LYp4ooiU24p0I0IuetoiEOIjVKK GCuhwSEUN30miNSff6L3vtX4azBUMhdAQo48vqr75YJoflAqTKZ4Jko9mXdqT0WUDO7POajMxhMNN fZPWe0sA==; Received: from 77-249-17-252.cable.dynamic.v4.ziggo.nl ([77.249.17.252] helo=noisy.programming.kicks-ass.net) by casper.infradead.org with esmtpsa (Exim 4.98.2 #2 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1vElKQ-0000000BDIS-0tr8; Fri, 31 Oct 2025 09:21:51 +0000 Received: by noisy.programming.kicks-ass.net (Postfix, from userid 1000) id 29CC730029E; Fri, 31 Oct 2025 10:21:50 +0100 (CET) Date: Fri, 31 Oct 2025 10:21:50 +0100 From: Peter Zijlstra To: Stephen Rothwell Cc: Thomas Gleixner , Ingo Molnar , "H. Peter Anvin" , Linux Kernel Mailing List , Linux Next Mailing List Subject: Re: linux-next: build failure after merge of the tip tree Message-ID: <20251031092150.GS3245006@noisy.programming.kicks-ass.net> References: <20251031120243.4394e6a8@canb.auug.org.au> Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: linux-next@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable In-Reply-To: <20251031120243.4394e6a8@canb.auug.org.au> On Fri, Oct 31, 2025 at 12:02:43PM +1100, Stephen Rothwell wrote: > Hi all, >=20 > After merging the tip tree, today's linux-next build (arm64 defconfig) > failed like this: arm64-defconfig builds just fine on tip/master, must be some conflict with the arm64 tree or so. Let me go have a peek.