From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from desiato.infradead.org (desiato.infradead.org [90.155.92.199]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 5CB40333737; Fri, 31 Oct 2025 09:57:03 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=90.155.92.199 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1761904627; cv=none; b=DjBYPBISvw6T3Aod2r+lTw6vnchiaDHo7UWdRT/PyYOSiGgvBkV49881SArb8pLyhrLRWP9SOMre5stwKWBnj1HCx0NvxmTAtrjcf+0PF6sv97zFiiwnFUsY9QUUOyZ58YhNqfYeMvvxQIgM2eZYOPI8mXxtbnJFYL51E+pNc9Q= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1761904627; c=relaxed/simple; bh=T8f8fFYfWlZ057HopKSbAjpleUHrJBq34V6fLF45xuo=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:Message-ID:References:MIME-Version: Content-Type:Content-Disposition:In-Reply-To; b=MzDRcjoXP5ellbwn8FTBKsQOS3/9sWwJmGjr+++q1xy4EIb3Dix1QI2O1R2ZIcnJBBZMFk33dTspHYVv6MwyYt9ksx/XUfvBV1V+wRlYsnoshE7mrU9Fs5UbmZAAvP8GK/2hJUx+HnJBQvMia6PicPMWlHaL3l30tLuP84x9+pA= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=infradead.org; spf=none smtp.mailfrom=infradead.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=infradead.org header.i=@infradead.org header.b=orQEsvWa; arc=none smtp.client-ip=90.155.92.199 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=infradead.org Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; spf=none smtp.mailfrom=infradead.org Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=infradead.org header.i=@infradead.org header.b="orQEsvWa" DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=infradead.org; s=desiato.20200630; h=In-Reply-To:Content-Type:MIME-Version: References:Message-ID:Subject:Cc:To:From:Date:Sender:Reply-To: Content-Transfer-Encoding:Content-ID:Content-Description; bh=6bLJOpgoIkHeKg63jKawwEB8uxgTfG/P1IPFEKRo2Wg=; b=orQEsvWa5yUiUXsbymaxEWORIg vy9YNTTEwPSPxw7KbRxHOCBFeYE2ICjhjRATTn7wcryifTyGDEt59I4dtpqNmbZ7Zc69JJ4oiDCR/ efBqjQ/7p760c5URsL1fixLLOhV2iDa3ET27Iq+hG9QoxgCcbhpGlq85cSGFuBRK/NslDOTvmcUEU fo6v6iNoiv01AJxCgfYbt3rOddU9xZCayKOs1kNewIyBB4KZevi7rQOc9C2HaItifud1NevPX2z9K twXbAzAoZ1WhwuDLxRHusJAcnDsWPdgW6JalPs9pC7lXot1MTxXv+YPElRGdZwvJHsO9E4kSYGesm HLROvr/w==; Received: from 77-249-17-252.cable.dynamic.v4.ziggo.nl ([77.249.17.252] helo=noisy.programming.kicks-ass.net) by desiato.infradead.org with esmtpsa (Exim 4.98.2 #2 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1vEl0j-0000000Axbj-0MuB; Fri, 31 Oct 2025 09:01:29 +0000 Received: by noisy.programming.kicks-ass.net (Postfix, from userid 1000) id B4D2930029E; Fri, 31 Oct 2025 10:56:58 +0100 (CET) Date: Fri, 31 Oct 2025 10:56:58 +0100 From: Peter Zijlstra To: Stephen Rothwell Cc: Thomas Gleixner , Ingo Molnar , "H. Peter Anvin" , Linux Kernel Mailing List , Linux Next Mailing List Subject: Re: linux-next: build failure after merge of the tip tree Message-ID: <20251031095658.GT4068168@noisy.programming.kicks-ass.net> References: <20251031120243.4394e6a8@canb.auug.org.au> <20251031092150.GS3245006@noisy.programming.kicks-ass.net> Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: linux-next@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20251031092150.GS3245006@noisy.programming.kicks-ass.net> On Fri, Oct 31, 2025 at 10:21:50AM +0100, Peter Zijlstra wrote: > On Fri, Oct 31, 2025 at 12:02:43PM +1100, Stephen Rothwell wrote: > > Hi all, > > > > After merging the tip tree, today's linux-next build (arm64 defconfig) > > failed like this: > > arm64-defconfig builds just fine on tip/master, must be some conflict > with the arm64 tree or so. Let me go have a peek. N/m, someone removed core/rseq already.. *sigh*