From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from desiato.infradead.org (desiato.infradead.org [90.155.92.199]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 0244D2EA479; Wed, 5 Nov 2025 08:56:40 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=90.155.92.199 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1762333003; cv=none; b=LbjtTwA7mi/8H2IHhLA8Zbw7mLoHPCYblwCO3ObYNiNTPUnXXSJ3PAnacKYo81Cvq2XzHjZMHtxxM0e50U7bC7br8HwaS9fwWioFsXPtHwcR3vf8FmjdMZcLW6FAhaonKODbIDqXnUz1Id/bs5dvIUbQ/wBCmZ7gCf6IFUoKKsw= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1762333003; c=relaxed/simple; bh=FtZ09HnczsfmJHeK6VIVud5Z/XyydU0A4O4OKqEko4M=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:Message-ID:References:MIME-Version: Content-Type:Content-Disposition:In-Reply-To; b=GM8yjT0+KNTm/jy8PlYrgBmquwRXLkWFTwD1LAGH+YoOIlJ7NL2fjZe4V+1Egf0L+y0SNRbGdyhhI0F4MtlOBjyfBLWjeUVOxCgNJUwbEmFF7fbyKH8Fca2VKpgjmA1j1Jv722YJxJzAqLDRz3pv/EfG1AUyFTC/ity7kbW8UZ8= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=infradead.org; spf=none smtp.mailfrom=infradead.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=infradead.org header.i=@infradead.org header.b=cu6/Vn7f; arc=none smtp.client-ip=90.155.92.199 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=infradead.org Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; spf=none smtp.mailfrom=infradead.org Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=infradead.org header.i=@infradead.org header.b="cu6/Vn7f" DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=infradead.org; s=desiato.20200630; h=In-Reply-To:Content-Type:MIME-Version: References:Message-ID:Subject:Cc:To:From:Date:Sender:Reply-To: Content-Transfer-Encoding:Content-ID:Content-Description; bh=DNtjIJAbQBBDXsPnvWJF1LFx1X0S2xH9jOEKzFxstX8=; b=cu6/Vn7fJHea1LIJw+1AtjP3/M QJoCbtTtTox9zQOTmbiBjmOP4hGZlDg3vWhfigaPMzCOTgjWDhZpbZOs1qhPPuOdPJvJuGwtDCfYU TlJ9MaJJbFtBLXySkUxy75819eLf29UAUerzwaziMOxxGek3Cj7u9p4JmMa7UlpJv4VYWmpgi8Jxk PeGce4n8G1uV/Es4lKUfx4bUZLal44tMwMUtpkAisCLSSciPtz9SLNnW4I7vhVJxpm2iC97dLsIPR OaMJYn7JdaLGALdsADnNIr9W+2hSjS3QZlM1/IMNfu0NhlS3/PouT+6fwN4Df6Pci+L0Mzb4tN3b4 QFeDEodg==; Received: from 77-249-17-252.cable.dynamic.v4.ziggo.nl ([77.249.17.252] helo=noisy.programming.kicks-ass.net) by desiato.infradead.org with esmtpsa (Exim 4.98.2 #2 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1vGYS5-00000001fyW-0AEF; Wed, 05 Nov 2025 08:01:09 +0000 Received: by noisy.programming.kicks-ass.net (Postfix, from userid 1000) id 308BA300230; Wed, 05 Nov 2025 09:56:37 +0100 (CET) Date: Wed, 5 Nov 2025 09:56:37 +0100 From: Peter Zijlstra To: Stephen Rothwell Cc: Josh Poimboeuf , Linux Next Mailing List , Linux Kernel Mailing List Subject: Re: linux-next: new objtool warnings Message-ID: <20251105085637.GO4067720@noisy.programming.kicks-ass.net> References: <20251031111515.09c9a4ed@canb.auug.org.au> <20251103091006.GV3245006@noisy.programming.kicks-ass.net> <20251103203256.5ac39302@canb.auug.org.au> <20251103093804.GY3245006@noisy.programming.kicks-ass.net> <20251105143027.214f491c@canb.auug.org.au> Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: linux-next@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20251105143027.214f491c@canb.auug.org.au> On Wed, Nov 05, 2025 at 02:30:27PM +1100, Stephen Rothwell wrote: > These objtool messages have returned today. No change in compiler. Yes, Ingo also reported them on IRC, let me go investigate!