linux-next.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
* linux-next: duplicate patches in the mfd-fixes tree
@ 2025-10-26 21:08 Stephen Rothwell
  2025-11-05  9:47 ` Lee Jones
  0 siblings, 1 reply; 4+ messages in thread
From: Stephen Rothwell @ 2025-10-26 21:08 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Lee Jones; +Cc: Linux Kernel Mailing List, Linux Next Mailing List

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 491 bytes --]

Hi all,

The following commits are also in Linus Torvalds' tree as different
commits (but the same patches):

  91a3e1f5453a ("mfd: ls2kbmc: Check for devm_mfd_add_devices() failure")
  fdff3cadeea9 ("mfd: ls2kbmc: Fix an IS_ERR() vs NULL check in probe()")

These are commits

  4af66c2bcab0 ("mfd: ls2kbmc: check for devm_mfd_add_devices() failure")
  0892507f4a0b ("mfd: ls2kbmc: Fix an IS_ERR() vs NULL check in probe()")

in Linus' tree.

-- 
Cheers,
Stephen Rothwell

[-- Attachment #2: OpenPGP digital signature --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 488 bytes --]

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread

* Re: linux-next: duplicate patches in the mfd-fixes tree
  2025-10-26 21:08 linux-next: duplicate patches in the mfd-fixes tree Stephen Rothwell
@ 2025-11-05  9:47 ` Lee Jones
  2025-11-05 12:35   ` Corey Minyard
  0 siblings, 1 reply; 4+ messages in thread
From: Lee Jones @ 2025-11-05  9:47 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Stephen Rothwell, Corey Minyard
  Cc: Linux Kernel Mailing List, Linux Next Mailing List

On Mon, 27 Oct 2025, Stephen Rothwell wrote:

> Hi all,
> 
> The following commits are also in Linus Torvalds' tree as different
> commits (but the same patches):
> 
>   91a3e1f5453a ("mfd: ls2kbmc: Check for devm_mfd_add_devices() failure")
>   fdff3cadeea9 ("mfd: ls2kbmc: Fix an IS_ERR() vs NULL check in probe()")
> 
> These are commits
> 
>   4af66c2bcab0 ("mfd: ls2kbmc: check for devm_mfd_add_devices() failure")
>   0892507f4a0b ("mfd: ls2kbmc: Fix an IS_ERR() vs NULL check in probe()")
> 
> in Linus' tree.

This is because Corey applied patches that they shouldn't have done,
despite being expressively requested not to!

https://lore.kernel.org/all/20251009095611.GC8757@google.com/

-- 
Lee Jones [李琼斯]

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread

* Re: linux-next: duplicate patches in the mfd-fixes tree
  2025-11-05  9:47 ` Lee Jones
@ 2025-11-05 12:35   ` Corey Minyard
  2025-11-05 15:15     ` Lee Jones
  0 siblings, 1 reply; 4+ messages in thread
From: Corey Minyard @ 2025-11-05 12:35 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Lee Jones
  Cc: Stephen Rothwell, Linux Kernel Mailing List,
	Linux Next Mailing List

On Wed, Nov 05, 2025 at 09:47:50AM +0000, Lee Jones wrote:
> On Mon, 27 Oct 2025, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
> 
> > Hi all,
> > 
> > The following commits are also in Linus Torvalds' tree as different
> > commits (but the same patches):
> > 
> >   91a3e1f5453a ("mfd: ls2kbmc: Check for devm_mfd_add_devices() failure")
> >   fdff3cadeea9 ("mfd: ls2kbmc: Fix an IS_ERR() vs NULL check in probe()")
> > 
> > These are commits
> > 
> >   4af66c2bcab0 ("mfd: ls2kbmc: check for devm_mfd_add_devices() failure")
> >   0892507f4a0b ("mfd: ls2kbmc: Fix an IS_ERR() vs NULL check in probe()")
> > 
> > in Linus' tree.
> 
> This is because Corey applied patches that they shouldn't have done,
> despite being expressively requested not to!
> 
> https://lore.kernel.org/all/20251009095611.GC8757@google.com/

I missed this completely, I'm sorry.

If there's anything I can do to fix this, I will, but I'm not sure what
is best now.

-corey

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread

* Re: linux-next: duplicate patches in the mfd-fixes tree
  2025-11-05 12:35   ` Corey Minyard
@ 2025-11-05 15:15     ` Lee Jones
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 4+ messages in thread
From: Lee Jones @ 2025-11-05 15:15 UTC (permalink / raw)
  To: Corey Minyard
  Cc: Stephen Rothwell, Linux Kernel Mailing List,
	Linux Next Mailing List

On Wed, 05 Nov 2025, Corey Minyard wrote:

> On Wed, Nov 05, 2025 at 09:47:50AM +0000, Lee Jones wrote:
> > On Mon, 27 Oct 2025, Stephen Rothwell wrote:
> > 
> > > Hi all,
> > > 
> > > The following commits are also in Linus Torvalds' tree as different
> > > commits (but the same patches):
> > > 
> > >   91a3e1f5453a ("mfd: ls2kbmc: Check for devm_mfd_add_devices() failure")
> > >   fdff3cadeea9 ("mfd: ls2kbmc: Fix an IS_ERR() vs NULL check in probe()")
> > > 
> > > These are commits
> > > 
> > >   4af66c2bcab0 ("mfd: ls2kbmc: check for devm_mfd_add_devices() failure")
> > >   0892507f4a0b ("mfd: ls2kbmc: Fix an IS_ERR() vs NULL check in probe()")
> > > 
> > > in Linus' tree.
> > 
> > This is because Corey applied patches that they shouldn't have done,
> > despite being expressively requested not to!
> > 
> > https://lore.kernel.org/all/20251009095611.GC8757@google.com/
> 
> I missed this completely, I'm sorry.
> 
> If there's anything I can do to fix this, I will, but I'm not sure what
> is best now.

Just the fact that you have now acknowledged this is enough for me.

However frustrating it may be, no real harm was done.

Thanks for reaching out.

-- 
Lee Jones [李琼斯]

^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread

end of thread, other threads:[~2025-11-05 15:16 UTC | newest]

Thread overview: 4+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2025-10-26 21:08 linux-next: duplicate patches in the mfd-fixes tree Stephen Rothwell
2025-11-05  9:47 ` Lee Jones
2025-11-05 12:35   ` Corey Minyard
2025-11-05 15:15     ` Lee Jones

This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).