From: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@canb.auug.org.au>
To: Mateusz Guzik <mjguzik@gmail.com>
Cc: Christian Brauner <brauner@kernel.org>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
Linux Next Mailing List <linux-next@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: linux-next: build warnings after merge of the vfs-brauner tree
Date: Wed, 12 Nov 2025 21:55:41 +1100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20251112215541.049f3ba8@canb.auug.org.au> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAGudoHEa=4HueuL8Ypfd5VNVyo5fEsfeY2+6c3nA2mvhXNt5Kw@mail.gmail.com>
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 387 bytes --]
Hi Mateusz,
On Wed, 12 Nov 2025 11:10:59 +0100 Mateusz Guzik <mjguzik@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> That func is a little special and I would argue it should not have
> these documented. Is there a way to exempt it?
Since the function is declared static, it doesn't really need
kernel-doc, so you should start the comment with "/*" instead of "/**".
--
Cheers,
Stephen Rothwell
[-- Attachment #2: OpenPGP digital signature --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 488 bytes --]
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2025-11-12 10:55 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 22+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2025-11-12 2:42 linux-next: build warnings after merge of the vfs-brauner tree Stephen Rothwell
2025-11-12 10:10 ` Mateusz Guzik
2025-11-12 10:55 ` Stephen Rothwell [this message]
2025-11-12 10:57 ` Mateusz Guzik
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2025-12-16 0:52 Stephen Rothwell
2025-11-17 6:47 Stephen Rothwell
2025-07-17 7:36 Stephen Rothwell
2025-07-22 10:24 ` Jann Horn
2025-03-05 10:07 Stephen Rothwell
2025-03-05 10:55 ` David Disseldorp
2024-12-13 4:27 Stephen Rothwell
2024-12-19 6:32 ` Stephen Rothwell
2025-01-14 5:48 ` Stephen Rothwell
2025-01-20 8:25 ` Stephen Rothwell
2025-01-20 12:15 ` Christian Brauner
2025-01-20 20:55 ` Stephen Rothwell
2024-12-11 3:37 Stephen Rothwell
2024-12-19 6:31 ` Stephen Rothwell
2024-12-19 12:40 ` Jeff Layton
2024-12-19 20:36 ` Stephen Rothwell
2025-01-06 13:50 ` Geert Uytterhoeven
2024-10-09 6:29 Stephen Rothwell
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20251112215541.049f3ba8@canb.auug.org.au \
--to=sfr@canb.auug.org.au \
--cc=brauner@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-next@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=mjguzik@gmail.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox