From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from zeniv.linux.org.uk (zeniv.linux.org.uk [62.89.141.173]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 7B87730E824; Thu, 15 Jan 2026 14:56:28 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=62.89.141.173 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1768488991; cv=none; b=t7gdOAoprVeJmHcsHKT6R2Pw7XSfKqUcklFWU3tLgOd+YHSGW/pF9NvS2XbT8QOWD6eXqVsEbYsp6pf2HX6Ekf0u+5JQxm4JwtTF8R+JbTWc7L/lLMMGVjy0E6yigcH/BztfIAn8ToGvWNdrKmx4MYkQFlI9oixgD1UBkEySPYA= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1768488991; c=relaxed/simple; bh=ZryEFmFkDBf2oaSBxz21vI2DAyEz9SITbuQSSjVIVd8=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:Message-ID:References:MIME-Version: Content-Type:Content-Disposition:In-Reply-To; b=jnAcFxFD7oLuTIu5h3J2CZfygRh+1CHqfQ+FhOle7xFPJh4sMhvdyHYSTBsOR1FoS989pCMFxRx8g1CK7vcFpvbMsGAXxMigc0v5lu3oGDa36S2wcCrObuIVsGzV1MQ3fSbLxD3WZ3vKUsMssFNm60LaD+UwDj3TXK/Rc9L92Gc= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=zeniv.linux.org.uk; spf=none smtp.mailfrom=ftp.linux.org.uk; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=linux.org.uk header.i=@linux.org.uk header.b=OFzmBG6T; arc=none smtp.client-ip=62.89.141.173 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=zeniv.linux.org.uk Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; spf=none smtp.mailfrom=ftp.linux.org.uk Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=linux.org.uk header.i=@linux.org.uk header.b="OFzmBG6T" DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=linux.org.uk; s=zeniv-20220401; h=Sender:In-Reply-To:Content-Type: MIME-Version:References:Message-ID:Subject:Cc:To:From:Date:Reply-To: Content-Transfer-Encoding:Content-ID:Content-Description; bh=fT3ggyjkdqM30zNOB+/wjBlmBd0XFYiEz6BxLVhCKfs=; b=OFzmBG6T5/4Jl+lqGXFt8HDgTt SlwwFQM0AEgN8JwG8XsL1RyergCGctVTgsBpjJ8xdPCOPPUi/tKnQar9EA/sfaXE/gRSnsPnQxQa3 3sYzCiVNd43UKKteB2zdX4O29rZ7BZp723YzYKfJPAqlKni3+0Ij7shCl6GWfWHUPDMkheIEO7H++ 8n7ufexzI6j6zbnel69NSEhBd6+cTnWzSnj3HHtAgcYAi7H6FSwJVVendV7CBp9YNyYRkPoA+ga64 8hoB56Rs4Jh5OQmacBcD8LsvabZ/d+QSlcjD9RwQGxtvC2jnQ8PPalZzDaNLVSea57r58XgFpR+0A ltwW6eYQ==; Received: from viro by zeniv.linux.org.uk with local (Exim 4.99 #2 (Red Hat Linux)) id 1vgOnK-00000002B1k-3eab; Thu, 15 Jan 2026 14:57:54 +0000 Date: Thu, 15 Jan 2026 14:57:54 +0000 From: Al Viro To: Mauro Carvalho Chehab Cc: Stephen Rothwell , Linux Kernel Mailing List , Linux Next Mailing List , Jonathan Corbet , Mauro Carvalho Chehab Subject: Re: linux-next: build warning after merge of the vfs tree Message-ID: <20260115145754.GZ3634291@ZenIV> References: <20260115140132.6e0c05a0@canb.auug.org.au> <20260115031053.GY3634291@ZenIV> <20260115150458.4ad09c28@canb.auug.org.au> <20260115092834.05f3bf66@foz.lan> Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: linux-next@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20260115092834.05f3bf66@foz.lan> Sender: Al Viro On Thu, Jan 15, 2026 at 09:28:34AM +0100, Mauro Carvalho Chehab wrote: > 1) Split it (and similar cases) into: > > "filename_link() and filename_renameat2()" > > which would give sphinx automarkup the opportunity to create > cross references > > (my preference) The final state right now is (admittedly sloppy) do_{mkdir,mknod,link,symlink,renameat2,rmdir,unlink}() are gone; filename_...() counterparts replace those. The difference is that the former used to consume filename references; the latter do not. Sure, the entire note can be split in 7 notes differing only in the names of removed function and its replacement, but it feels wrong ;-/