From: Nathan Chancellor <nathan@kernel.org>
To: Mark <broonie@kernel.org>
Cc: Jonathan Corbet <corbet@lwn.net>,
Guillaume Tucker <gtucker@gtucker.io>,
Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@intel.com>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
Linux Next Mailing List <linux-next@vger.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: linux-next: manual merge of the jc_docs tree with the kbuild tree
Date: Mon, 26 Jan 2026 15:55:11 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20260126225511.GA866955@ax162> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <aXeZT4VGXCf3a6CF@sirena.org.uk>
On Mon, Jan 26, 2026 at 04:41:51PM +0000, Mark wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> Today's linux-next merge of the jc_docs tree got a conflict in:
>
> Documentation/dev-tools/index.rst
>
> between commit:
>
> 6eac13c876805 ("Documentation: dev-tools: add container.rst page")
>
> from the kbuild tree and commit:
>
> a592a36e49372 ("Documentation: use a source-read extension for the index link boilerplate")
>
> from the jc_docs tree.
>
> I fixed it up (see below) and can carry the fix as necessary. This
> is now fixed as far as linux-next is concerned, but any non trivial
> conflicts should be mentioned to your upstream maintainer when your tree
> is submitted for merging. You may also want to consider cooperating
> with the maintainer of the conflicting tree to minimise any particularly
> complex conflicts.
>
> diff --cc Documentation/dev-tools/index.rst
> index 527a0e4cf2ed8,4fc9d15f91d09..0000000000000
> --- a/Documentation/dev-tools/index.rst
> +++ b/Documentation/dev-tools/index.rst
> @@@ -38,12 -38,3 +38,4 @@@ Documentation/process/debugging/index.r
> gpio-sloppy-logic-analyzer
> autofdo
> propeller
> + container
> -
> -
> - .. only:: subproject and html
> -
> - Indices
> - =======
> -
> - * :ref:`genindex`
Thanks, looks good to me. I have made a note of it for the upcoming
merge window. I assume this conflict is not going to be uncommon :)
Cheers,
Nathan
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-01-26 22:55 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-01-26 16:41 linux-next: manual merge of the jc_docs tree with the kbuild tree Mark
2026-01-26 22:55 ` Nathan Chancellor [this message]
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2020-03-11 1:07 Stephen Rothwell
2017-06-26 1:13 Stephen Rothwell
2017-07-03 2:58 ` Stephen Rothwell
2017-07-03 16:43 ` Kamil Rytarowski
2017-07-03 18:13 ` Jonathan Corbet
2017-07-03 18:33 ` Stephen Rothwell
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20260126225511.GA866955@ax162 \
--to=nathan@kernel.org \
--cc=broonie@kernel.org \
--cc=corbet@lwn.net \
--cc=gtucker@gtucker.io \
--cc=jani.nikula@intel.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-next@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox