From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from smtp.kernel.org (aws-us-west-2-korg-mail-1.web.codeaurora.org [10.30.226.201]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 61B7537418F; Tue, 7 Apr 2026 03:39:13 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=10.30.226.201 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1775533153; cv=none; b=sBelyLOJtzupnym0q7N8ZF9Y6Ij553dB4TdQ9O0cHwnLHaaKNxjEOieivcXv9rBlPlz+AHYX7YVb8d9+L4Y102+fCk3KDODSmPwYWflmGTgcnZONP3eUwgDa+wopfrDzrHXqYSdZF0awxpcoR/FWytylCMFknr0oBZfWTGgWAGE= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1775533153; c=relaxed/simple; bh=EvcPBPwx/vcsz/jA7IUAvD5qKrvzVLoUvLXfmij7b/g=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:Message-Id:In-Reply-To:References: Mime-Version:Content-Type; b=mndKkBa5wWnU4/q8blwsrBpx4no/TUfjx14vJj27ciUJZmu022mAumaUTvgnEPXotiIlQDFu/xKqVp7CDf0oxMbtNA8FQL7pakj0CPMBqAK6Bk80rBaJVIqMaNEQsDjmDqlcn12oqeh4SJdtQ/F99Obe4X4ccyVCmRxAeiNqe+4= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=linux-foundation.org header.i=@linux-foundation.org header.b=Rs+RLJLC; arc=none smtp.client-ip=10.30.226.201 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=linux-foundation.org header.i=@linux-foundation.org header.b="Rs+RLJLC" Received: by smtp.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id CAF02C116C6; Tue, 7 Apr 2026 03:39:11 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=linux-foundation.org; s=korg; t=1775533153; bh=EvcPBPwx/vcsz/jA7IUAvD5qKrvzVLoUvLXfmij7b/g=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:In-Reply-To:References:From; b=Rs+RLJLCmju+UdoteQVgGhc28rT8w6LXWTPdtGQ1spcHkGDAR/jk5CRXCXBkcEF+C za1RXjvkYAfYcjsiAxtKlkodVWjxoc/fUrJngAOt3fiu8VyCi7Ecey2gdbFsqwzSAn Wt2x+JtOwo0unm9c90AH7VisbO5nVJgbpMLFyMU4= Date: Mon, 6 Apr 2026 20:39:11 -0700 From: Andrew Morton To: Joseph Qi Cc: Mark Brown , Christian Brauner , Jeff Layton , Linux Kernel Mailing List , Linux Next Mailing List Subject: Re: linux-next: manual merge of the fs-next tree with the mm-nonmm-unstable tree Message-Id: <20260406203911.12084f57acd2784ec7ae2c4a@linux-foundation.org> In-Reply-To: References: <20260406092553.8737d1e3834fe6fdeeaaa8fb@linux-foundation.org> X-Mailer: Sylpheed 3.8.0beta1 (GTK+ 2.24.33; x86_64-pc-linux-gnu) Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: linux-next@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit On Tue, 7 Apr 2026 10:19:59 +0800 Joseph Qi wrote: > > > On 4/7/26 12:25 AM, Andrew Morton wrote: > > On Mon, 6 Apr 2026 14:13:49 +0100 Mark Brown wrote: > > > >> Today's linux-next merge of the fs-next tree got a conflict in: > >> > >> fs/ocfs2/dir.c > >> > >> between commits: > >> > >> bdff37e327275 ("ocfs2: validate dx_root extent list fields during block read") > >> 28c33de101792 ("ocfs2: remove empty extent list check in ocfs2_dx_dir_lookup_rec()") > >> > >> from the mm-nonmm-unstable tree and commit: > >> > >> 0b2600f81cefc ("treewide: change inode->i_ino from unsigned long to u64") > >> > >> from the fs-next tree. > > > > Thanks. That's a nasty-looking conflict due to the applying order. The > > 0b2600f81cefc change is actually small, below. > > > > Hopefully Linus can figure it out ;) > > > > > Should I resend the series base on the latest linux-next? It should be OK - the resolution is straightforward and Linus is good at these things.