Linux-Next discussions
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Masami Hiramatsu (Google) <mhiramat@kernel.org>
To: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Cc: Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org>,
	Bradley Morgan <include@grrlz.net>,
	Breno Leitao <leitao@debian.org>,
	Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
	Linux Next Mailing List <linux-next@vger.kernel.org>,
	Masami Hiramatsu <mhiramat@kernel.org>
Subject: Re: linux-next: manual merge of the mm-nonmm-unstable tree with the tip-fixes tree
Date: Fri, 3 Jul 2026 23:41:14 +0900	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20260703234114.3ac790ca6a173741c204d210@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260702102850.12ce82e1e2e95766d52e0093@linux-foundation.org>

On Thu, 2 Jul 2026 10:28:50 -0700
Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> wrote:

> On Thu, 2 Jul 2026 15:04:29 +0100 Mark Brown <broonie@kernel.org> wrote:
> 
> > Hi all,
> > 
> > Today's linux-next merge of the mm-nonmm-unstable tree got a conflict in:
> > 
> >   lib/bootconfig.c
> > 
> > between commit:
> > 
> >   dec4d8118c179 ("bootconfig: fix NULL-pointer arithmetic in xbc_snprint_cmdline()")
> > 
> > from the tip-fixes tree and commit:
> > 
> >   9f2274451ae6b ("lib/bootconfig: fix undefined behavior involving NULL pointer arithmetic")
> > 
> > from the mm-nonmm-unstable tree which look like two fixes for the same
> > issue.
> 
> hm, OK, thanks.  I don't know which is preferable, really.  I'll drop
> the mm.git patch because the tip-fixes patch has a nice comment ;)
> 

Ah, yes. I replied to it. Thanks for dropping.

https://lore.kernel.org/all/20260701082611.6575e0f37541014f67830bdc@kernel.org/

Thank you,
-- 
Masami Hiramatsu (Google) <mhiramat@kernel.org>

      reply	other threads:[~2026-07-03 14:41 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2026-07-02 14:04 linux-next: manual merge of the mm-nonmm-unstable tree with the tip-fixes tree Mark Brown
2026-07-02 17:28 ` Andrew Morton
2026-07-03 14:41   ` Masami Hiramatsu [this message]

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20260703234114.3ac790ca6a173741c204d210@kernel.org \
    --to=mhiramat@kernel.org \
    --cc=akpm@linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=broonie@kernel.org \
    --cc=include@grrlz.net \
    --cc=leitao@debian.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-next@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox