* linux-next: Signed-off-by missing for commits in the uml-fixes tree
@ 2025-02-12 22:24 Stephen Rothwell
2025-02-12 22:42 ` Richard Weinberger
0 siblings, 1 reply; 3+ messages in thread
From: Stephen Rothwell @ 2025-02-12 22:24 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Richard Weinberger; +Cc: Linux Kernel Mailing List, Linux Next Mailing List
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 612 bytes --]
Hi all,
Commits
fb4cc5f19d36 ("um: convert irq_lock to raw spinlock")
4e9b8ce9f58f ("um: virtio_uml: use raw spinlock")
cafe54dc8e56 ("um: virt-pci: don't use kmalloc()")
acc4521e845b ("um: fix execve stub execution on old host OSs")
02fef369f75a ("um: properly align signal stack on x86_64")
cfaa0ff6e035 ("um: avoid copying FP state from init_task")
05c322fb75a4 ("um: add back support for FXSAVE registers")
are missing a Signed-off-by from their committer.
They appear to have all been rebased but not had SOB's for the new
commiter added.
--
Cheers,
Stephen Rothwell
[-- Attachment #2: OpenPGP digital signature --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 488 bytes --]
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread* Re: linux-next: Signed-off-by missing for commits in the uml-fixes tree
2025-02-12 22:24 linux-next: Signed-off-by missing for commits in the uml-fixes tree Stephen Rothwell
@ 2025-02-12 22:42 ` Richard Weinberger
2025-02-13 0:19 ` Stephen Rothwell
0 siblings, 1 reply; 3+ messages in thread
From: Richard Weinberger @ 2025-02-12 22:42 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Stephen Rothwell; +Cc: linux-kernel, Linux Next Mailing List
----- Ursprüngliche Mail -----
> Von: "Stephen Rothwell" <sfr@canb.auug.org.au>
> Hi all,
>
> Commits
>
> fb4cc5f19d36 ("um: convert irq_lock to raw spinlock")
> 4e9b8ce9f58f ("um: virtio_uml: use raw spinlock")
> cafe54dc8e56 ("um: virt-pci: don't use kmalloc()")
> acc4521e845b ("um: fix execve stub execution on old host OSs")
> 02fef369f75a ("um: properly align signal stack on x86_64")
> cfaa0ff6e035 ("um: avoid copying FP state from init_task")
> 05c322fb75a4 ("um: add back support for FXSAVE registers")
>
> are missing a Signed-off-by from their committer.
>
> They appear to have all been rebased but not had SOB's for the new
> commiter added.
That was fast. :D
The branch was prepared by Johannes before the merge window and now
I have rebased it to v6.14-rc2.
So, I'll add my SOB too, ok?
Thanks,
//richard
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread* Re: linux-next: Signed-off-by missing for commits in the uml-fixes tree
2025-02-12 22:42 ` Richard Weinberger
@ 2025-02-13 0:19 ` Stephen Rothwell
0 siblings, 0 replies; 3+ messages in thread
From: Stephen Rothwell @ 2025-02-13 0:19 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Richard Weinberger; +Cc: linux-kernel, Linux Next Mailing List
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 312 bytes --]
Hi Richard,
On Wed, 12 Feb 2025 23:42:38 +0100 (CET) Richard Weinberger <richard@nod.at> wrote:
>
> The branch was prepared by Johannes before the merge window and now
> I have rebased it to v6.14-rc2.
> So, I'll add my SOB too, ok?
Yeah, that would be good, thanks.
--
Cheers,
Stephen Rothwell
[-- Attachment #2: OpenPGP digital signature --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 488 bytes --]
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 3+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2025-02-13 0:20 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2025-02-12 22:24 linux-next: Signed-off-by missing for commits in the uml-fixes tree Stephen Rothwell
2025-02-12 22:42 ` Richard Weinberger
2025-02-13 0:19 ` Stephen Rothwell
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox