From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.8 required=3.0 tests=DKIM_SIGNED,DKIM_VALID, DKIM_VALID_AU,HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SPF_HELO_NONE, SPF_PASS,URIBL_BLOCKED autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id AB676C432C3 for ; Thu, 14 Nov 2019 20:11:13 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [209.132.180.67]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 856B720679 for ; Thu, 14 Nov 2019 20:11:13 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=redhat.com header.i=@redhat.com header.b="TxTyrN9Z" Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1726613AbfKNULN (ORCPT ); Thu, 14 Nov 2019 15:11:13 -0500 Received: from us-smtp-delivery-1.mimecast.com ([207.211.31.120]:37341 "EHLO us-smtp-1.mimecast.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-FAIL) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1726988AbfKNULN (ORCPT ); Thu, 14 Nov 2019 15:11:13 -0500 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=redhat.com; s=mimecast20190719; t=1573762271; h=from:from:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date:message-id:message-id: to:to:cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type: content-transfer-encoding:content-transfer-encoding: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references; bh=VTSMW7yiszdsz9+obyoZO8enMubl8X2pXKrcjl0PUMI=; b=TxTyrN9ZExxoycdWx5XlYHU/ui9PTx8Yj9lbrVf5CK8ONDu9SveWFYU/AhEvpYK0MGP7Lf DB+IibyRkpJoCWrOlpZ43wk9ymYszX/nSpvW8Y6LURIXzRiCvCLnpyNLe924dtrinNT7/3 4RBptn+w0XEU46aW3vgC0ISJ2w8hBEo= Received: from mimecast-mx01.redhat.com (mimecast-mx01.redhat.com [209.132.183.4]) (Using TLS) by relay.mimecast.com with ESMTP id us-mta-355-40nTPR-8OIWJANFhu8z5Yw-1; Thu, 14 Nov 2019 15:11:08 -0500 Received: from smtp.corp.redhat.com (int-mx02.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com [10.5.11.12]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mimecast-mx01.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 66D7CDB60; Thu, 14 Nov 2019 20:11:05 +0000 (UTC) Received: from colo-mx.corp.redhat.com (colo-mx02.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com [10.5.11.21]) by smtp.corp.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 5779C60BE1; Thu, 14 Nov 2019 20:11:05 +0000 (UTC) Received: from zmail17.collab.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com (zmail17.collab.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com [10.5.83.19]) by colo-mx.corp.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id B2F454BB5C; Thu, 14 Nov 2019 20:11:04 +0000 (UTC) Date: Thu, 14 Nov 2019 15:11:04 -0500 (EST) From: Jan Stancek To: Naresh Kamboju , Arnd Bergmann Cc: Linux Next Mailing List , Linux Kernel Mailing List , linux-clk@vger.kernel.org, Stephen Rothwell , Daniel Lezcano , Mark Brown , lkft-triage@lists.linaro.org, LTP List , chrubis , John Stultz , Dmitry Vyukov Message-ID: <247236994.12271471.1573762264445.JavaMail.zimbra@redhat.com> In-Reply-To: References: <20191114193132.5de921a7@canb.auug.org.au> Subject: Re: linux-next: Tree for Nov 14 MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Originating-IP: [10.40.204.254, 10.4.195.5] Thread-Topic: linux-next: Tree for Nov 14 Thread-Index: YqTkoYhDRfL/aNkJZ5JfFnjXrrr8Bg== X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 2.79 on 10.5.11.12 X-MC-Unique: 40nTPR-8OIWJANFhu8z5Yw-1 X-Mimecast-Spam-Score: 0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Sender: linux-next-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-next@vger.kernel.org ----- Original Message ----- > On Thu, 14 Nov 2019 at 14:01, Stephen Rothwell wro= te: > > > > Hi all, > > Changes since 20191113: > > The y2038 tree gained a build failure for which I applied a patch. > > > The akpm-current tree gained a conflict against the y2038 tree. > > > > Non-merge commits (relative to Linus' tree): 10388 > > 9238 files changed, 397357 insertions(+), 174171 deletions(-) >=20 > Results from Linaro=E2=80=99s test farm. > Regressions detected on x86_64, and i386. >=20 > LTP syscalls settimeofday01/02 failed on x86_64 and i386 running > 5.4.0-rc7-next-20191114. >=20 > Following ltp-syscalls-tests failed. > * settimeofday01 > * settimeofday02 > * stime01 > * stime02 Looks like typo in adde74306a4b ("y2038: time: avoid timespec usage in settimeofday()") - if (!timeval_valid(&user_tv)) + if (tv->tv_usec > USEC_PER_SEC) was likely meant as: - if (!timeval_valid(&user_tv)) + if (new_ts.tv_nsec > USEC_PER_SEC) since tv is user pointer.