From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: David Howells Subject: Re: linux-next: manual merge of the creds tree Date: Fri, 17 Oct 2008 11:34:54 +0100 Message-ID: <26941.1224239694@redhat.com> References: <20081017171350.bb82c42a.sfr@canb.auug.org.au> Return-path: Received: from mx2.redhat.com ([66.187.237.31]:37582 "EHLO mx2.redhat.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1751688AbYJQKfe (ORCPT ); Fri, 17 Oct 2008 06:35:34 -0400 In-Reply-To: <20081017171350.bb82c42a.sfr@canb.auug.org.au> Sender: linux-next-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: To: Stephen Rothwell Cc: dhowells@redhat.com, James Morris , linux-next@vger.kernel.org, "Kirill A. Shutemov" , Andrew Morton Stephen Rothwell wrote: > Today's linux-next merge of the creds tree got a conflict in > include/linux/binfmts.h between commits > 53112488bebe25c0f5f8a002470046c0fe9a6c61 ("alpha: introduce field 'taso' > into struct linux_binprm") and bf2a9a39639b8b51377905397a5005f444e9a892 > ("Allow recursion in binfmt_script and binfmt_misc") from Linus' tree and > commit e87a7f7a60e07326cd18987f1d490e42c083792c ("CRED: Make execve() > take advantage of copy-on-write credentials") from the creds tree. ACK.