From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: Alex Dubov Subject: Re: linux-next: block tree build failure Date: Sun, 14 Sep 2008 22:38:32 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <278380.30002.qm@web37604.mail.mud.yahoo.com> References: <20080915151844.16569141.sfr@canb.auug.org.au> Reply-To: oakad@yahoo.com Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Return-path: Received: from web37604.mail.mud.yahoo.com ([209.191.87.87]:47818 "HELO web37604.mail.mud.yahoo.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with SMTP id S1750833AbYIOFpO (ORCPT ); Mon, 15 Sep 2008 01:45:14 -0400 In-Reply-To: <20080915151844.16569141.sfr@canb.auug.org.au> Sender: linux-next-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: To: Jens Axboe , Stephen Rothwell Cc: linux-next@vger.kernel.org, Tejun Heo --- On Sun, 9/14/08, Stephen Rothwell wrote: > From: Stephen Rothwell > Subject: linux-next: block tree build failure > To: "Jens Axboe" > Cc: linux-next@vger.kernel.org, "Alex Dubov" , "Tejun Heo" > Date: Sunday, September 14, 2008, 10:18 PM > Hi Jens, > > Today's linux-next build (x86_64 allmodconfig) failed > like this: > > drivers/memstick/core/mspro_block.c: In function > 'mspro_block_disk_release': > drivers/memstick/core/mspro_block.c:200: error: > 'MEMSTICK_PART_SHIFT' undeclared (first use in this > function) > That's funny. My last patch replaced all occurrences of this macro.