From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.1 required=3.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIMWL_WL_HIGH, DKIM_SIGNED,DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS, MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 40B69C433E1 for ; Mon, 27 Jul 2020 13:36:46 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1CD9A20672 for ; Mon, 27 Jul 2020 13:36:46 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=redhat.com header.i=@redhat.com header.b="DjUMmeNF" Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1726897AbgG0Ngp (ORCPT ); Mon, 27 Jul 2020 09:36:45 -0400 Received: from us-smtp-delivery-1.mimecast.com ([207.211.31.120]:38793 "EHLO us-smtp-1.mimecast.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-FAIL) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1726298AbgG0Ngp (ORCPT ); Mon, 27 Jul 2020 09:36:45 -0400 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=redhat.com; s=mimecast20190719; t=1595857004; h=from:from:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date:message-id:message-id: to:to:cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references; bh=8D67ol3aJBpMshrqkN6iSV7ca0jH4mAuZgj7ZHwQHi4=; b=DjUMmeNFd4r0vXcloI+g01WyrZoFNMU0YZ3Xu6uKkCuzUq3E+6/Xe6bZxS8rJ8bsZtzNpu kE8zXcsoeocNpd5XUIVW/6wmRvNOn32Vv7GJaVTsRgN+1SN4FSPDVUXCT1p/7L4h5yIO/F 07i7awKSO7cHGGGOze1dXxH2rY8IhCA= Received: from mimecast-mx01.redhat.com (mimecast-mx01.redhat.com [209.132.183.4]) (Using TLS) by relay.mimecast.com with ESMTP id us-mta-395-sUa4tk6JNR63pW1PtrxTuw-1; Mon, 27 Jul 2020 09:36:41 -0400 X-MC-Unique: sUa4tk6JNR63pW1PtrxTuw-1 Received: from smtp.corp.redhat.com (int-mx06.intmail.prod.int.phx2.redhat.com [10.5.11.16]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mimecast-mx01.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 53EA91932482; Mon, 27 Jul 2020 13:36:40 +0000 (UTC) Received: from warthog.procyon.org.uk (ovpn-112-32.rdu2.redhat.com [10.10.112.32]) by smtp.corp.redhat.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6E97B5C1B2; Mon, 27 Jul 2020 13:36:39 +0000 (UTC) Organization: Red Hat UK Ltd. Registered Address: Red Hat UK Ltd, Amberley Place, 107-111 Peascod Street, Windsor, Berkshire, SI4 1TE, United Kingdom. Registered in England and Wales under Company Registration No. 3798903 From: David Howells In-Reply-To: <20200727224626.463ffeaf@canb.auug.org.au> References: <20200727224626.463ffeaf@canb.auug.org.au> To: Stephen Rothwell Cc: dhowells@redhat.com, Andrew Morton , Linux Next Mailing List , Linux Kernel Mailing List Subject: Re: linux-next: manual merge of the akpm tree with the fsinfo tree MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Content-ID: <2814723.1595856998.1@warthog.procyon.org.uk> Date: Mon, 27 Jul 2020 14:36:38 +0100 Message-ID: <2814724.1595856998@warthog.procyon.org.uk> X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 2.79 on 10.5.11.16 Sender: linux-next-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-next@vger.kernel.org Stephen Rothwell wrote: > The notificiations tree has been rebased to remove a new syscall and > the fsinfo tree rebased on top of that, so the syscall numbers have all > changed again :-( Would it make it easier it if I just left a hole for the syscall I dropped for the moment? David