From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: David Howells Subject: Re: linux-next: manual merge of the creds tree Date: Wed, 12 Nov 2008 18:23:36 +0000 Message-ID: <2867.1226514216@redhat.com> References: <20081112163006.d526f0eb.sfr@canb.auug.org.au> Return-path: Received: from mx2.redhat.com ([66.187.237.31]:33123 "EHLO mx2.redhat.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1752041AbYKLSXn (ORCPT ); Wed, 12 Nov 2008 13:23:43 -0500 In-Reply-To: <20081112163006.d526f0eb.sfr@canb.auug.org.au> Sender: linux-next-owner@vger.kernel.org List-ID: To: Stephen Rothwell Cc: dhowells@redhat.com, James Morris , linux-next@vger.kernel.org Stephen Rothwell wrote: > Today's linux-next merge of the creds tree got a conflicts in > security/keys/internal.h and security/keys/process_keys.c between commit > 1f8f5cf6e4f038552a3e47b66085452c08556d71 ("KEYS: Make request key > instantiate the per-user keyrings") from Linus' tree and > f71e534c1149637f4eb186b351e6afeb8584551c ("KEYS: Alter use of key > instantiation link-to-keyring argument") from the creds tree. > > It needs local knowledge to fix up, so I will drop the creds tree for > today. I've pushed a merge of that. David