Re: linux-next: manual merge of the mm-stable tree with the cifs tree

[David Howells <dhowells@redhat.com>]

Matthew Wilcox <willy@infradead.org> wrote:

> > +			start = folio_pos(folio); /* May regress with THPs */
> 
> What does this comment mean?

"start" may end up going backwards if it's pointing to the middle of a folio.

> > +			/* At this point we hold neither the i_pages lock nor the
> > +			 * page lock: the page may be truncated or invalidated
> > +			 * (changing page->mapping to NULL), or even swizzled
> > +			 * back from swapper_space to tmpfs file mapping
> 
> Where does this comment come from?  This is cifs, not tmpfs.  You'll
> never be asked to writeback a page from the swap cache.  Dirty pages
> can be truncated, so the first half of the comment is still accurate.
> I'd rather it moved down to below the folio lock, and was rephrased
> so it described why we're checking everything again.

I picked it up into afs from somewhere - nfs maybe?  The same comment is in
fs/btrfs/extent_io.c.  grep for 'swizzled' in fs/.  You modified the comment
in b93b016313b3ba8003c3b8bb71f569af91f19fc7 in 2018, so it's been around a
while.

David