From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E16ECC433FE for ; Wed, 23 Nov 2022 08:19:21 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S236092AbiKWITV (ORCPT ); Wed, 23 Nov 2022 03:19:21 -0500 Received: from lindbergh.monkeyblade.net ([23.128.96.19]:56104 "EHLO lindbergh.monkeyblade.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S236450AbiKWITT (ORCPT ); Wed, 23 Nov 2022 03:19:19 -0500 Received: from szxga01-in.huawei.com (szxga01-in.huawei.com [45.249.212.187]) by lindbergh.monkeyblade.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 412A5D06D4; Wed, 23 Nov 2022 00:19:18 -0800 (PST) Received: from dggpemm500023.china.huawei.com (unknown [172.30.72.55]) by szxga01-in.huawei.com (SkyGuard) with ESMTP id 4NHDY11xyzzmW64; Wed, 23 Nov 2022 16:18:45 +0800 (CST) Received: from dggpemm500006.china.huawei.com (7.185.36.236) by dggpemm500023.china.huawei.com (7.185.36.83) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_128_GCM_SHA256) id 15.1.2375.31; Wed, 23 Nov 2022 16:19:16 +0800 Received: from [10.174.178.55] (10.174.178.55) by dggpemm500006.china.huawei.com (7.185.36.236) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_128_GCM_SHA256) id 15.1.2375.31; Wed, 23 Nov 2022 16:19:16 +0800 Subject: Re: linux-next: build warnings after merge of the rcu tree To: Stephen Rothwell , "Paul E. McKenney" CC: Linux Kernel Mailing List , "Linux Next Mailing List" References: <20221123163255.48653674@canb.auug.org.au> From: "Leizhen (ThunderTown)" Message-ID: <2be7872b-3978-9ea2-c00b-6b075516ec74@huawei.com> Date: Wed, 23 Nov 2022 16:19:15 +0800 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; WOW64; rv:60.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/60.7.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <20221123163255.48653674@canb.auug.org.au> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="windows-1252" Content-Language: en-US Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Originating-IP: [10.174.178.55] X-ClientProxiedBy: dggems704-chm.china.huawei.com (10.3.19.181) To dggpemm500006.china.huawei.com (7.185.36.236) X-CFilter-Loop: Reflected Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-next@vger.kernel.org On 2022/11/23 13:32, Stephen Rothwell wrote: > Hi all, > > After merging the rcu tree, today's linux-next build (htmldocs) produced > these warnings: > > Documentation/RCU/stallwarn.rst:401: WARNING: Literal block expected; none found. > Documentation/RCU/stallwarn.rst:428: WARNING: Literal block expected; none found. > Documentation/RCU/stallwarn.rst:445: WARNING: Literal block expected; none found. > Documentation/RCU/stallwarn.rst:459: WARNING: Literal block expected; none found. > Documentation/RCU/stallwarn.rst:468: WARNING: Literal block expected; none found. > > Introduced by commit > > 3d2788ba4573 ("doc: Document CONFIG_RCU_CPU_STALL_CPUTIME=y stall information") > Strange thing, I specially executed make htmldocs before, unexpectedly did not find these warnings. I already know why. The literal block is not indented. I will post a new version to Paul E. McKenney. Excuse me for causing trouble to everyone. For example: @@ -398,9 +398,9 @@ In kernels built with CONFIG_RCU_CPU_STALL_CPUTIME=y or booted with rcupdate.rcu_cpu_stall_cputime=1, the following additional information is supplied with each RCU CPU stall warning:: -rcu: hardirqs softirqs csw/system -rcu: number: 624 45 0 -rcu: cputime: 69 1 2425 ==> 2500(ms) + rcu: hardirqs softirqs csw/system + rcu: number: 624 45 0 + rcu: cputime: 69 1 2425 ==> 2500(ms) -- Regards, Zhen Lei